similar to: [Bug 910] known_hosts port numbers

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |foomzilla at fuhm.net ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2005-04-21 18:16 ------- *** Bug 454 has been marked as a

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 mindrot at askneil.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mindrot at askneil.com ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454 ------- Additional Comments From foomzilla at fuhm.net 2004-12-17 06:01 ------- See also bug 910 for a patch. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ildefonso_camargo at yahoo.com ------- Comment #42 from dtucker at zip.com.au 2006-06-20 09:32 ------- *** Bug 1198 has been marked

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #920 is|0 |1 obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2005-08-09 23:09 -------

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 Summary: known_hosts port numbers Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.7.1p2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: devin.nate at

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #954 is|0 |1 obsolete| | Attachment #1052 is|0 |1 obsolete|

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 devin.nate at bridgecomm.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #980 is|0 |1 obsolete| | ------- Comment #39 from devin.nate at bridgecomm.net 2006-02-21 14:08

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 fullung at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fullung at gmail.com ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454 Summary: SSH doesn't consider distinguish ports for host-key verification Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.4p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo:

I dug through the list archives to see if this had come up before, and I see that a bug <http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393> was submitted and subsequently closed (basically rejected) in 2002. The basic issue, for those of you who don't feel like following the bug URL, is that when one has ssh servers behind a NAT, each of which responds to a different port on the NAT IP,

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1544 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED |--- --- Comment #27 from Damien Miller <djm at

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476 Summary: .ssh/known_hosts does not save port number Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.0p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=943 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Comment #4 from djm at mindrot.org 2005-11-06 03:53 -------

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1602 Marc Herbert <marc.herbert+mindrot at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX |--- --- Comment #7 from Marc Herbert

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=943 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX CC| |djm

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393 mindrot at askneil.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mindrot at askneil.com ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393 natasha+maui at safe-emails.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|mindrot at askneil.com | ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1788 Summary: simple option to ignore known_hosts Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.5p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: avalon at

Before I went to the trouble of implementing this feature and sending in a patch, I want to see what the general reaction would be... I allow ssh through my firewall under certain circumstances. My firewall is a Linux box running ipchains, but it could just as easily be any firewall that can forward external ports to internal ports. My internal network uses non-published addresses, so I forward