similar to: [Bug 910] known_hosts port numbers

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ildefonso_camargo at yahoo.com ------- Comment #42 from dtucker at zip.com.au 2006-06-20 09:32 ------- *** Bug 1198 has been marked

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 devin.nate at bridgecomm.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #980 is|0 |1 obsolete| | ------- Comment #39 from devin.nate at bridgecomm.net 2006-02-21 14:08

The .ssh/known_hosts table cannot handle reaching different sshd servers behind a NAT router. The machines are selected by having the SSHDs respond to differnt ports. A second request would be to allow known_hosts checking solely on the dns name, wildcarding the IP address. This would be useful to avoid continuously warning the user every time you connect to a machine with a changing IP address

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 Summary: known_hosts port numbers Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.7.1p2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: devin.nate at

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |foomzilla at fuhm.net ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2005-04-21 18:16 ------- *** Bug 454 has been marked as a

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=549 Summary: Login Delay / Remove unwanted reverse map check Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.5p1 Platform: PPC OS/Version: AIX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #954 is|0 |1 obsolete| | Attachment #1052 is|0 |1 obsolete|

Hello Bob and thank you for your reply, first of all I hope that I'm answering in the right way since I had enabled the daily digest and I'm not sure if it's the right way to use Thunderbirds "Reply List" feature on this digest. If it's wrong this way I apologize. I turned of the daily digest so my next messages should be correct. > Are you aware of HostKeyAlias?

On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 17:18, Stuart Longland VK4MSL <me at vk4msl.com> wrote: > On 18/8/23 15:39, Darren Tucker wrote: [...] > > I think you just need "HostKeyAlias mytarget" here. > > Ahh, in my scanning through the `ssh_config` manpage, I missed this, and > change logs seem to indicate this feature has been around since at least > 2017, so should not cause

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393 markus at openbsd.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-09-11

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393 mindrot at askneil.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mindrot at askneil.com ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the

Hi OpenSSH developers; Thank you for your amazing work. I?m emailing to see if any knowledgeable OpenSSH developer is willing to help us review / revamp some patches we have for OpenSSH, and provide advice on some of the more advanced uses of OpenSSH. This would be a for pay contract engagement. We are trying to be super respectful of the process, and are happy to be very creative ? we are

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #920 is|0 |1 obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2005-08-09 23:09 -------

I dug through the list archives to see if this had come up before, and I see that a bug <http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393> was submitted and subsequently closed (basically rejected) in 2002. The basic issue, for those of you who don't feel like following the bug URL, is that when one has ssh servers behind a NAT, each of which responds to a different port on the NAT IP,

On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 23:16, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> wrote: [...] > I gave up on $HOME/.ssh/known_hosts a *long* time ago, because if > servers are DHCP distributed without static IP addresses they can wind > up overlapping IP addresses with mismatched hostkeys You can set CheckHostIP=no in your config. As long as the names don't change it'll do what you

On 18/8/23 15:39, Darren Tucker wrote: >> Host mytarget >> Hostname 172.16.1.2 >> ProxyJump user2 at bastion2 > I think you just need "HostKeyAlias mytarget" here. Ahh, in my scanning through the `ssh_config` manpage, I missed this, and change logs seem to indicate this feature has been around since at least 2017, so should not cause

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8367 Summary: Add a feature to --move-existing files Product: rsync Version: 3.0.8 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: devin.nate at cloudwerx.com

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393 natasha+maui at safe-emails.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|mindrot at askneil.com | ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Hi all, When I set up multiple tunnels from remote hosts to ports on localhost, I get the following error when I try to use them: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ @ WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED! @ @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ IT IS POSSIBLE THAT SOMEONE IS DOING SOMETHING NASTY! (even though the keys haven't

I have had a brief discussion with Damien Miller (below) about storing host port values in the known_hosts file so as to track multiple ssh sessions (with independant keys) that run on a single host but accept connections on different ports. If it were possible to state that a given key for a remote host belonged to that host's ssh session on port 23 and that another key belonged to that