similar to: [Bug 910] known_hosts port numbers

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 devin.nate at bridgecomm.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #980 is|0 |1 obsolete| | ------- Comment #39 from devin.nate at bridgecomm.net 2006-02-21 14:08

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 mindrot at askneil.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mindrot at askneil.com ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ildefonso_camargo at yahoo.com ------- Comment #42 from dtucker at zip.com.au 2006-06-20 09:32 ------- *** Bug 1198 has been marked

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #954 is|0 |1 obsolete| | Attachment #1052 is|0 |1 obsolete|

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #920 is|0 |1 obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2005-08-09 23:09 -------

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 foomzilla at fuhm.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | ------- Additional Comments From foomzilla at fuhm.net 2004-11-23 11:15

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476 Summary: .ssh/known_hosts does not save port number Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.0p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 fullung at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fullung at gmail.com ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |foomzilla at fuhm.net ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2005-04-21 18:16 ------- *** Bug 454 has been marked as a

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=549 Summary: Login Delay / Remove unwanted reverse map check Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.5p1 Platform: PPC OS/Version: AIX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

Before I went to the trouble of implementing this feature and sending in a patch, I want to see what the general reaction would be... I allow ssh through my firewall under certain circumstances. My firewall is a Linux box running ipchains, but it could just as easily be any firewall that can forward external ports to internal ports. My internal network uses non-published addresses, so I forward

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2169 Bug ID: 2169 Summary: command to remove outdated hostkey from known_hosts file wrong Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.2p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: ssh

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=523 Summary: ssh saves only host/ip information in known_hosts while port information is missing Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.5p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh

I dug through the list archives to see if this had come up before, and I see that a bug <http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393> was submitted and subsequently closed (basically rejected) in 2002. The basic issue, for those of you who don't feel like following the bug URL, is that when one has ssh servers behind a NAT, each of which responds to a different port on the NAT IP,

Hello, What about using the full ip/tcp address in known_hosts? I have two hosts at (sample addresses): 192.168.0.1:22 192.168.0.1:2222 When I connect to the first one everything is OK, but if I connect to the second one I get: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ @ WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED! @

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393 Summary: 'known_hosts' file should be indexed by IP:PORT, not just IP Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo:

Hi OpenSSH developers; Thank you for your amazing work. I?m emailing to see if any knowledgeable OpenSSH developer is willing to help us review / revamp some patches we have for OpenSSH, and provide advice on some of the more advanced uses of OpenSSH. This would be a for pay contract engagement. We are trying to be super respectful of the process, and are happy to be very creative ? we are

The .ssh/known_hosts table cannot handle reaching different sshd servers behind a NAT router. The machines are selected by having the SSHDs respond to differnt ports. A second request would be to allow known_hosts checking solely on the dns name, wildcarding the IP address. This would be useful to avoid continuously warning the user every time you connect to a machine with a changing IP address

Hi everyone, I am trying to get Debian bug #668239 [1] resolved, which is concerned with the way paramiko (a SSH implementation in Python) deals with OpenSSH's known_hosts file when non-standard ports are used. Hence, I want to make sure that I correctly understand OpenSSH's behaviour. If this is not a topic for this list, please point me to a more appropriate list. As far as I can

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9948 Summary: Patch to provide progress display in log file Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: devin.nate at