similar to: Getting rid of all the .rpmsave files

Hello I just upgraded Centos, and now doing some post upgarde task to make sure every thing is fine. First of all, it seems upgrade add rpmsave extension to configuration files, which we should copy them back example is /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf.rpmsave also what is Pegasus ? there is a lot of rpmsaved in /var/lib/pegasus example :

After you do your update, done forget to do updatedb, makewhatis, ... The locate for rpmnew has a couple items of interest and the locate for rpmsave returns one that occupies 24MB of your precious disks - /var/lib/Pegasus/prev-repository*. It compresses nicely to appx. 1MB, cpio bzipped --best. Change in your rndc key too, for DNS.

Hi list! I read the trixbox anouncement that they downgraded to kernel version 34 to get rid of some audio problems I'm not running trixbox but normal Centos 4 with asterisk installed. I tried to find some further info on this but couldn't find any. Do audio problems occur with normal Centos and the latest kernel version too? (In other words, should every centos user downgrade??)

Hi Nithya, I applied the workarround for this bug and now df shows the right size: [root at stor1 ~]# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb1 26T 1,1T 25T 4% /mnt/glusterfs/vol0 /dev/sdc1 50T 16T 34T 33% /mnt/glusterfs/vol1 stor1data:/volumedisk0 101T 3,3T 97T 4% /volumedisk0 stor1data:/volumedisk1

Hi Jose, On 28 February 2018 at 18:28, Jose V. Carri?n <jocarbur at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Nithya, > > I applied the workarround for this bug and now df shows the right size: > > That is good to hear. > [root at stor1 ~]# df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/sdb1 26T 1,1T 25T 4% /mnt/glusterfs/vol0 > /dev/sdc1

Hi Jose, On 28 February 2018 at 22:31, Jose V. Carri?n <jocarbur at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Nithya, > > My initial setup was composed of 2 similar nodes: stor1data and stor2data. > A month ago I expanded both volumes with a new node: stor3data (2 bricks > per volume). > Of course, then to add the new peer with the bricks I did the 'balance > force' operation.

Hi Nithya, My initial setup was composed of 2 similar nodes: stor1data and stor2data. A month ago I expanded both volumes with a new node: stor3data (2 bricks per volume). Of course, then to add the new peer with the bricks I did the 'balance force' operation. This task finished successfully (you can see info below) and number of files on the 3 nodes were very similar . For volumedisk1 I

Hi Nithya, Below the output of both volumes: [root at stor1t ~]# gluster volume rebalance volumedisk1 status Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in h:m:s --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------

I'm sorry for my last incomplete message. Below the output of both volumes: [root at stor1t ~]# gluster volume rebalance volumedisk1 status Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in h:m:s --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------

Hi Jose, There is a known issue with gluster 3.12.x builds (see [1]) so you may be running into this. The "shared-brick-count" values seem fine on stor1. Please send us "grep -n "share" /var/lib/glusterd/vols/volumedisk1/*" results for the other nodes so we can check if they are the cause. Regards, Nithya [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517260

Hi! I installed shorewall shorewall-2.1.7-1 on a newly installed box. When using 1.4 versions I could enable shorewall in ntsysv, now shorewall doesn''t show up in ntsysv? I am running shorewall on a RedHat Enterprise Linux rebuild (www.taolinux.org). Is this a bug or a feature?

Hi, Some days ago all my glusterfs configuration was working fine. Today I realized that the total size reported by df command was changed and is smaller than the aggregated capacity of all the bricks in the volume. I checked that all the volumes status are fine, all the glusterd daemons are running, there is no error in logs, however df shows a bad total size. My configuration for one volume:

Hi list! Is anyone using the Kirk IP600/3 with SIP firmware connected to Asterisk? Any experiences / caveats? If anyone would be willing to share the dump of their IP600 config file, i would really appreciate it. Is there anything special i should put in my asterisk config? Thanks !!! Remco

The information (or lack of it) on upgrading from zaptel to that @&*^QW%&^%!!! dahdi is very frustrating. I cannot find anything on how to uninstall zaptel, i found an earlier post to this list which suggested make uninstall and make remove in the zaptel directory which just generates errors and does nothing (on zaptel 12.1). Then i install dahdi-linux and dahdi-tools and i want to

Hi list! I've been bitten by a bug in the latest kernel 2.6.9-34.EL and I already removed the old kernel. Are old kernels retained at any place? I need to go back to 2.6.9-22.02 but where can I find it? In the Centos 4.3 directory I find only the latest kernel, not the older ones? Thanks!!

I have an analog GSM Gateway that is connected to a normal SIP ATA device. Basically what it does is this : when you call the extension nr. of the SIP ATA port, the GSM Gateway will pick up the phone and presents a (new) dial tone, and then dials whichever DTMF tones it received. The SIP ATA ia a Grandstream HT286. I would like to use the GSM Gateway to route my outbound cellular calls, how

Could anybody help me with the correct rules to allow a client to connect to an NFS share on my Linux box/firewall? >From what I understand from some howto''s on the net is that there are several daemons that are required to make NFS work. Some rules I found in the NFS howto: iptables -A INPUT -f -j ACCEPT -s 192.168.0.45 iptables -A INPUT -s 192.168.0.45 -d 0/0 32765:32768 -p 6 -j

Hello centOS users, Today i've installed a fresh centos 3.1, and modified the [update] section of my/etc/yum.conf, to point on my own update repository. My update repository (3.1) contains exactly the same content that the official one. Update was successful but now /etc/yum.conf is missing :( Here it is what i've noticed during the update process: # cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS

Hi! I have this rule to allow incoming VNC connections to a host on my private LAN: DNAT net:$SITE1 loc:$JOHN tcp 5900:5910 This works perfectly the host can connect without problems. Would it be possible to link the internal host to an external ip? For example if Site1 would connect on the VNC port, all traffic gets forwarded to loc:$JOHN. But if net:$SITE2 connects

Hi folks, Just updating clamav 'bundle' from old 'clamav-server' (i think the just previous) and i noticed that the 'clamav' user/group for this pkg is not created by default by the rpm pkg. At the same time, the /var/log/clamav is not updated/created with clamav.clamav ownership, Don't know if it is my actual config (previous one untouched anyway), but this is what