similar to: [Bug 762] ssh does not exit if local port could not be bound with options -L and -N

We try to run a reliable ssh tunnel vis systemd. This is the unit configuration file: {{{ [Unit] Description=Tunnel For %i After=network.target [Service] User=autossh ExecStart=/usr/bin/ssh -o "ExitOnForwardFailure yes" -o "ServerAliveInterval 60" -N -R 40443:installserver:40443 -R 8080:installserver:8080 ExecStartPre=-/usr/bin/ssh tunnel@%i "for pid in $$(ps -u

Hello, Today I tried using "dynamically assigned" port for remote listener, by requesting listener on port 0. This is supposed to create a listener on a port choosen by server. Everything seemed OK (the choosen port was sent back to client), but forwarding was refused. So I checked the source. in channels.c, function: channel_setup_fwd_listener /* *

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=244 Summary: Remote port forwarding on solaris 8x86 doesn't work Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.1p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org

Hi, I'm having a small problem when using ProxyCommand and ExitOnForwardFailure in combination with OpenSSH 5.1 under Ubuntu 8.04. In order to enable multihop scp and port forwarding, I have enabled automatic public key authenticated tunneling from hostA to hostC via hostB using ProxyCommand in my private .ssh/config file on hostA. <end of .ssh/config>: host hostB user X hostC

FINALLY, it's here. You can now tell SSH which address to bind to for every single port forwarding option! This patch allows you to pass the following as ssh command line options: ssh -L 192.168.1.55:1234:localhost:80 -R ::11:22:aa:bb/80/localhost/80 etc. Or as normal config file options: LocalForward ::11:22:33/1234 localhost/80 RemoteForward 1.2.3.4:80 localhost:80 It will also

After the previous small patch submitted to log info about X11 forwarding, I've moved on to trying to log information about remote port forwarding. The remote hostname is showing up as 'localhost'. That's not useful. sshd -ddd shows the following in the midst of an incoming "ssh -R 22220:faron:22 linus". Obviously I want to see the word 'faron' somewhere but

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1592 Summary: Fingerprints for SSHD host key don't match (local ssh-keygen -l vs. ssh localhost) Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.1p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413 Summary: Port forwarding: [localhost:]localport:remotehost:remoteport Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: older versions Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2222 Bug ID: 2222 Summary: GatewayPorts=no should not rewrite localhost addresses in port-forward requests Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.5p1 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5

Have you tried "optimx" package that John Nash and I wrote? The main purpose is to be able to readily compare multiple optimizers on a particular class of problems and see which one seems to do the best. It doesn't include nloptr, but most other optimizers are there. Ravi ________________________________________ From: R-devel <r-devel-bounces at r-project.org> on behalf of

Hi Spencer: See the link below about L-BFGS-B below because I had problems with it a good while back (and I think the link description is the cause but I can't prove it ) so eventually I moved to the Rvmmin(b) package. It's a package but really an algorithm. Rvmmin(b) uses a variable-metric algorithm similar to that of L-BFGS-B but without the problem below. It's not surprisingly a

>>>>> Spencer Graves <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com> >>>>> on Sat, 8 Oct 2016 18:03:43 -0500 writes: [.............] > 2. It would be interesting to know if the > current algorithm behind optim and optimx with > method='L-BFGS-B' incorporates Morales and Nocedal (2011) > 'Remark on ?Algorithm 778:

Hello, How do I find out what is happening to my packets thru my ipsec tunnel. They just seem to disappear on the remote side. I have successfully got the pings thru when everything has an ipv6 address, but am not successful when trying to connect two ipv4 lans across an ipv6 ipsec tunnel. All fw chains both 4 and 6 are set to ACCEPT. NAT is turned off. eth0 eth1

hello * Problem: [root at darwin lib]# smbclient -L localhost -N session setup failed: NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER samba version: Samba 3.4.9 ( any version > 3.4 probably will show this behaviour ) cause of this response is this entry in smb.conf: encrypt passwords = No as soon as this parameter is commented out smbclient -L -N works as expected A "clean" default smb.conf was

Hello all, When I execute "smbclient -L SAZZLE -N", I get back a three part response: Sharename Type Comment --------- ---- ------- software Disk Network Software Server Comment --------- ------- SAZZLE Samba PDC Server 2.0.3 CRACKLE FACULTY

Hi, Finally have samba installed in ubuntu 18.04. Ran dc setup.. Server Role:           active directory domain controller Hostname:              dc1 NetBIOS Domain:        REDACTED DNS Domain:            internal DOMAIN SID:            S-1-5-21-3313626214-3140439515-2095946098 smbstatus: Samba version 4.7.6-Ubuntu PID     Username     Group        Machine                                  

Hello, I am a Samba newbie, setting up Samba on a FreeBSD machine in a Windows (2K) environment [or the other way around] - all in a small LAN behind a DSL router / firewall. The machines recognize each other in that I can ping to both in either directions using either IP #'s or hostnames. On the PC's I am using LMHOST , no local WINS or local DNS (there are DNS's on the WAN side of

I'm creating a patch to support Unix domain socket forwarding. I hadn't intended to initally support specifying remote Unix domain sockets (#ifdef'd that code out in the parse_forward() work), but now that I've gotten as far as channel_setup_fwd_listener() it seems like it makes sense to add the support now, rather than later. Any comments on adding to channels.h the following (w/

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1457 Ian Donaldson <iand at ekit-inc.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |iand at ekit-inc.com --- Comment #6 from Ian Donaldson <iand at ekit-inc.com> --- Any updates on this? I

I would appreciate any ideas on how to correct the problem that we are having that is outlined below. Thanks for your help. I have been running samba for a long time. Currently we are having problems with it filling up /var/log/messages with Feb 7 10:45:02 servername smbd[2157]: Can't become connected user! Feb 7 10:45:02 servername smbd[2158]: [2008/02/07 10:45:02, 0] smbd/