similar to: [Bug 760] GatewayPorts clarification in _config man pages

I'm running Tinc on a Linux machine inside my home network, connecting through a NATing router to a Tinc server out on the Internet. I've noticed that fairly frequently the SSH sessions I leave open (but unused) get aborted with a "Connection reset by peer" message. When I investigated closely, I found that after a period of inactivity my router times out the UDP

We have a Zenoss server in our main office monitoring (among many other things) an Apache server in a remote network, with a Tinc link between the two networks. The monitoring simply involves making an HTTP request to a URL once every 5 minutes and confirming that a response page comes back. Most of the requests to this particular web server succeed (and similar requests to other web servers

All nodes was connected both 1.1pre10 and 1.1pre11 before "tinc -n vpn restart" at Node 1. Shouldnt at least the 1.1pre10 nodes connect again? 2015-05-18 23:39 GMT+02:00 Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org>: > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:04:09PM +0200, ?smund Rabbe wrote: > > > One of the nodes (Node5) stopped working a while ago (2 - 3 weeks or so), > > other

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:12:40 +0200, Florent B wrote: > On 05/13/2015 05:00 PM, Guus Sliepen wrote: > > I have no experience with Ubuntu, but I find it hard to believe it would > > block ICMP Fragmentation Needed packets out of the box. > > I can confirm you that this is the case. Ubuntu ignores those ICMP > packets... :( (rp_filter settings) > > You can see it

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 00:09:40 +0200, ?smund Rabbe wrote: > All nodes was connected both 1.1pre10 and 1.1pre11 before "tinc -n vpn > restart" at Node 1. Is there any chance some configuration file on Node 1 got changed somehow after the previous time you started up the daemon, such that when you restarted it recently it came up with a different configuration than it had before?

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 19:34:21 -0400, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote: > It seems that when the cksum is incorrect, it is always off by 1. > [...] > Am I correct in concluding that this cksum problem is a bug in Tinc? After investigating this further, I'm fairly certain that problem originates in the following lines of the clamp_mss() function in route.c: [...] csum ^=

Hi, I am triying to configure a VPN, my configuration files are: ****************** TINC.CONF: Name = nova # The internet host to connect with. ConnectTo = nova2 Device = /dev/net/tun #Device name.. Leave as is. Interface = vpn #Virtual Interface name. Give any suitable name. #Mode = "router" #use Router mode

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217 Summary: mdoc2man.pl puts wrong name into ssh.1 man page Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.1p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: Documentation AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=173 Summary: sshd does not listen on tcp-socket, though GatewayPorts yes Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.1p1 Platform: UltraSparc OS/Version: SunOS Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2222 Bug ID: 2222 Summary: GatewayPorts=no should not rewrite localhost addresses in port-forward requests Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.5p1 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203 Summary: X11 forwarding ignores GatewayPorts flag Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.1p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1297 ted at midg3t.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Remote forwards do not bind |No feedback when remote |to the selected address |forward is localhost-only |

No answers on secureshell at securityfocus.com I must be doing something wrong or the server seems to ignore my bind request. Port forwarding is working it just bind to all ips and ignores my bind request. I've also tried this with an rfc1918 address opposed to a loopback and had the same results. Google and the archive haven't helped. Thanks in advance for your time and consideration.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2473 Bug ID: 2473 Summary: sshd and -R port forwardings on 127.0.0.0/8 Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.6p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: sshd Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3802 Bug ID: 3802 Summary: Secure forwardings, check connecting user Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.9p2 Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Miscellaneous Assignee: unassigned-bugs

Hello everybody on this list, First of all; I wish everyone entering a new year that the new year will be a better one and a very prosperous one. Whilest playing around with OpenSSH, in particular with the sshd_config file, I noticed that it seems to be possible to add a comment also at the end of lines with directives by prepending the comment with a hash (in common *nix fashion), in addition

[Not subscribed to this list, so please respond directly if you need to speak to me] In man5/sshd_config.5, a permissible keyword in a 'Match' block is missing. It currently lists only: AllowTcpForwarding, Banner, ForceCommand, GatewayPorts, GSSApiAuthentication, KbdInteractiveAuthentication, KerberosAuthentication, PasswordAuthentication, PermitOpen, PermitRootLogin,

OpenSSH 4.1 has just been released. It will be available from the mirrors listed at http://www.openssh.com/ shortly. OpenSSH is a 100% complete SSH protocol version 1.3, 1.5 and 2.0 implementation and includes sftp client and server support. We would like to thank the OpenSSH community for their continued support to the project, especially those who contributed source and bought T-shirts or

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=173 ------- Additional Comments From stevesk at pobox.com 2002-03-19 08:31 ------- see sshd.8 X11UseLocalhost ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1297 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dtucker at zip.com.au Attachment #1515| |ok+ Flags|