similar to: [Bug 749] Connection is dropped for invalid user

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=355 Summary: No last login message with PrivSep under AIX Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: PPC OS/Version: AIX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444 Summary: Wrong path to ssh in scp after re-configure Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.5p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Build system AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org

I'm trying to understand the code around PAM support in auth2.c and auth2-chall.c. I'm working with the OpenSSH 3.7.1p2 sources on FreeBSD 4.x. The scenario I'm trying to make work is SSH login to a captive accout for users in a RADIUS database but whose login does not appear in /etc/passwd or getpwnam(). I understand that if the username is not found in getpwnam(), then the

Hi openssh community, I am very new to the source code of openssh and trying to make the LDAP Public Key authentication work. I found that I need to change a line in the monitor.c to make it work, I would like to ask the community whether this is desirable at all. 1. I have created a pair of RSA private key and public key 2. I have setup the public key to the remote LDAP server, as the

Hi, there's a change made to 4.4p1, which gave some irritation on the Cygwin mailing list. It's a change from 20060907: - (djm) [sshd.c auth.c] Set up fakepw() with privsep uid/gid, so it can be used to drop privilege to; fixes Solaris GSSAPI crash reported by Magnus Abrante; suggestion and feedback dtucker@ NB. this change will require that the privilege separation user must

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=899 Summary: sshd displays illegal usernames through setproctitle() Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.8.1p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org

this is at the bottom of auth.c. What is it? struct passwd * fakepw(void) { static struct passwd fake; memset(&fake, 0, sizeof(fake)); fake.pw_name = "NOUSER"; fake.pw_passwd = "$2a$06$r3.juUaHZDlIbQaO2dS9FuYxL1W9M81R1Tc92PoSNmzvpEqLkLGrK"; fake.pw_gecos = "NOUSER"; fake.pw_uid = -1; fake.pw_gid = -1; fake.pw_class =

> -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Lee Jenkins > Sent: Monday, May 28, 2007 8:57 PM > To: Chris Earle; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Multiple TDM400p cards in one machine -- > nolonger an issue? > > Chris

Not res_config_mysql cdr_addon_mysql. All it does is log call detail records. According to bug http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=4749 cdr_addon_mysql should not behave in this way. Therefore 1. there is no realtime DB besides ASTDB storage of SIP phones, and 2. CDR is not a life-or-death situation for asterisk, if it stops asterisk should continue and replicate later (the year-old bug cited

Hi, I am working on the following SSH solution and I need some help: 1. User ssh against my node where he/she does not have an account 2. Firstly the node synchronize its user database from a remote db with ldap. (just refresh the database, no authentication here) 3. Authenticate the user with a PAM module I am using my synchronisation script as a PAM module but it seems that the authentication

Apologies if this messages appears more than once, somehow sending it via gmane's nntp-server doesn't work as expected. Been trying to send this message for 2 days now, without success so far... --- Hello, I'm exploring the capablities of Asterisk and must say I'm really impressed! However, I don't need most of the options, but can't figure out the things that appear

Hello! Please consider including the attached patch in the next release. It allows one to drop privilege separation code while building openssh by using '--disable-privsep' switch of configure script. If one doesn't use privilege separation at all, why don't simply allow him to drop privilege separation support completely? -- Sincerely Your, Dan. -------------- next part

yesterday I upgrade my samba from 3.09-1 to the current 3.0.10-2 after completing the upgrade process I can nolonger connect to my samba sever from windows xp client. I start the serveces list to see what smbd & nmbd is doing, and notice that smbd has 6 pid running and nmbd has only 2 running. Winbind is not running as well how can I solve this problem and what step should I take to correct

Hello, I can nolonger build R packages in R 2.6.0 (win xp). I get the error message 'sh' is not recognized as an internal or external command. In earlier versions of R I had no problems. Maybe that someone can help me with this. Jean-Paul Fox. C:\PROGRA~1\R\R-2.6.0\bin>Rcmd build --force --binary C:\Temp\R260\mlirt * checking for file

> Date: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 21:30:31 -0500 > From: Fred Smith <fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> > > is a continual pain. > > I'm attempting to follow the instructions here: > http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showpost.php?p=1650497&postcount=27 > > (yes, I know it's a fedora forum (but the same stupid mistake > persists in the GE packages)

1) Misspelled message ''killing umanaged domain'' (must be killing UNmanaged domain) 2) more serious. I found this message after disappearance of virtual machine created early. I restart XAPI tool stack and machine was killed (not shutdowned, but completely removing). Here log (from machine where domain was resident) Main line in log file I suspect:

Hello! I recently discoverd a problem with ssh.com's ssh-agent2 and OpenSSH: If I have more than one key in my agent, then the agent tries to authenticicate me with every one of them at the OpenSSH server; but none of them is a valid key for that server. The Problem is that the Server increments the authctxt->attempt at every of that tries. So even if you want to login with a password at

Hi, after upgrading samba from 4.1.17 to 4.1.19 on OpenSuSE 13.2, any shares offered by this machine can nolonger be accessed, when these shares contain an entry "force group" which specifies a local unix group and when there exists a unix user with the same name. Here's an excerpt from smb.conf: [FactWork] comment = FactWork-Downloadportal path =

is a continual pain. I'm attempting to follow the instructions here: http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showpost.php?p=1650497&postcount=27 (yes, I know it's a fedora forum (but the same stupid mistake persists in the GE packages) but apparently the rpmrebuild binary is nolonger available, at least not in Centos (specifically, CentOS-7.2.1511). As I know little about all the various rpm

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 03:14:06AM +0000, Richard wrote: > > > > Date: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 21:30:31 -0500 > > From: Fred Smith <fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> > > > > is a continual pain. > > > > I'm attempting to follow the instructions here: > > http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showpost.php?p=1650497&postcount=27 > >