similar to: [Bug 423] Workaround for pw change in privsep mode (3.5.p1)

As many of you know, OpenSSH 3.7.X, unlike previous versions, makes PAM authentication take place in a separate process or thread (launched from sshpam_init_ctx() in auth-pam.c). By default (if you don't define USE_POSIX_THREADS) the code "fork"s a separate process. Or if you define USE_POSIX_THREADS it will create a new thread (a second one, in addition to the primary thread). The

I'm using OpenSSH-2.9.9p2 on Solaris 8 sparc64. 2.9p2 worked fine, but 2.9.9p2+ is giving me trouble with one thing - sshd segfaults if I try to connect and execute a command, such as "ssh machine ls". Otherwise it works great. sshd will fork, and the child process segfaults. CVS snapshot does the same thing. I've narrowed this down somewhat. It will only happen if you use

Hello All. Attached is an update to my previous patch to make do_pam_chauthtok and privsep play nicely together. First, a question: does anybody care about these or the password expiration patches? Anyway, the "PRIVSEP(do_pam_hauthtok())" has been moved to just after the pty has been allocated but before it's made the controlling tty. This allows the child running chauthtok to

Hello all, I'd greatly appreciate a patch that will stop PAM mucking around after I log in with a Kerberos 4 ticket and forward an AFS ticket (KTH Kerberos 1.1.1 used for libkrb/libkafs). The trouble is, I need pam_krb4, so that folks, who log in with without tickets using tunnelled plaintext password, would get Kerberos 4 tickets for the box. I rebuilt sshd without PAM in order to verify

on hp-ux 11 i see: $ date;ssh jenny Fri Oct 12 14:44:13 PDT 2001 Last successful login for stevesk: Fri Oct 12 10:45:42 PST8PDT 2001 on pts/2 Last unsuccessful login for stevesk: Mon Sep 24 22:55:53 PST8PDT 2001 Last login: Fri Oct 12 10:45:43 2001 from 172.31.1.53 You have mail. so solaris PAM is different. can other solaris+PAM users confirm this? On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Benn Oshrin wrote:

Hello, We use USE_POSIX_THREADS in our HP-UX build of OpenSSH. When we connect a non-root user with PAM [pam-kerberos] then I get the following error. debug3: PAM: opening session debug1: PAM: reinitializing credentials PAM: pam_setcred(): Failure setting user credentials This is particularly for non-root users with PrivSep YES. When I connect to a root user with PrivSep YES or to a non-root

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83 ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2003-03-10 15:49 ------- Created an attachment (id=247) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=247&action=view) Call pam_session after child fork() Hopefully this patch will allow people to gather the feedback necessary to close this bug. ------- You are receiving this

Hi, I was investigating why I don't see any warnings from pam_ldap indicating the pending expiration of passwords as well as for PAM_NEW_AUTHTOK_REQD. Eventually, I found that do_pam_account() does not have a conversation function. Also, there is a function print_pam_messages (currently empty) which look suspiciously like it is ear marked to show just those error messages: /* auth-pam.c

There have been a few recent commits to portable OpenSSH that require testing. It would be appreciated if you could grab the 20031118 (or later) snapshot and give it a try on your platforms of choice. Ideally, "giving it a try" means running the regress tests, in addition to casual (non-production) use and reporting your experiences back to the list. The more platforms and compile-time

When we installed OpenSSH 2.1.1p4 on our Solaris systems, our users noticed that it did not honor password expiration consistently with other Solaris login services. The patch below is against OpenSSH 2.2.0p1 and adds support for PAM password changes on expiration via pam_chauthtok(). A brief summary of changes: auth-pam.c: * change declaration of pamh to "static pam_handle_t *pamh",

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423 ------- Additional Comments From michael_steffens at hp.com 2002-11-02 02:40 ------- Created an attachment (id=162) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=162&action=view) Patch: Workaround for pw change in privsep mode (3.5.p1) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are

heres a fix for pam support im openssh, inline and attached.. openssh calls do_pam_session early, before a fork(). it does this on the proc still running as root, so it checks the users limits, against what root has running, and depending on limits can fail at the fork() (and almost always does). this patch moves it past the fork. ive been running it for a couple of weeks and everything seems

I'm fairly new to the list and new to submitting patches. Can someone please verify the attached patch for running a HP-UX Trusted System with PAM and OpenSSH 3.4p1? The problem seemed to be that pam couldn't verify the user via __pamh after the call to permanently_set_uid in session.c. So I called do_pam_session prior to the call and added a function do_pam_set_tty in order to set the

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423 Summary: Workaround for pw change in privsep mode (3.5.p1) Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.5p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419 Summary: HP-UX PAM problems with 3.5p1 Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: HPPA OS/Version: HP-UX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

Hi, I am running FreeBSD 4.7 and openssh 3.7.1p1. I have enabled PAM usage and indeed, I can use PAM for authentication purposes. Since configure does login_cap.h, the preprocessor is side stepping do_pam_session() altogether in session.c:do_setusercontext(). Here is my patch for session.c. My understanding about portability issues is rather limited. I would very much appreciate if you

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423 ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2003-03-10 12:06 ------- The patch looks good, but the only thing that makes me wary is the use of signals for IPC. Would it not be possible to do the chauthtok call earlier? E.g. after the call to do_pam_session() in do_exec_pty()? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You

A while back, I sent in a patch that added Digital Unix SIA authentication to OpenSSH. Well, I just figured out that it didn't handle everything correctly (locked accounts could still log in). I thought I had checked that, but I guess I missed it. Anyway, here is a patch against OpenSSH 2.2.0p1 that fixes this. -- Chris Adams <cmadams at hiwaay.net> Systems and Network Administrator

Is anyone maintaining the OSF_SIA support in openssh? This seems to be an obvious bug triggered if you try to connect as a non-existant user. >From auth1.c line 459 #elif defined(HAVE_OSF_SIA) (sia_validate_user(NULL, saved_argc, saved_argv, get_canonical_hostname(), pw->pw_name, NULL, 0, NULL, "") == SIASUCCESS)) { #else /*

Hello all, On Redhat 6.2, the PAM_unix module logs the session opening, but not the session closing. This was logged as of 2.3.0p1. Upgrading to 2.5.1p1 makrs the start of the problem. Thanks in advance, Victor -- Victor J. Orlikowski ====================== v.j.orlikowski at gte.net orlikowski at apache.org vjo at us.ibm.com