similar to: [Bug 617] /etc/services disregarded

More patch-o-rama :-( ---Mike >From: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@dione.ids.pl> >To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com, <vulnwatch@securityfocus.com>, > <full-disclosure@netsys.com> >X-Nmymbofr: Nir Orb Buk >Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Sendmail 8.12.9 prescan bug (a new one) >[CAN-2003-0694] >Sender: full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com >X-BeenThere:

Has anyone around here heard of this ? ---Mike >Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] new ssh exploit? >From: christopher neitzert <chris@neitzert.com> >Reply-To: chris@neitzert.com >To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com >X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3.99 >Sender: full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com >X-BeenThere: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com

Hi all, I'm fitting a linear model (using lm) to some 2500 data points. The model consists of 4 single terms and two combined terms. I get the following warning message: "Extra arguments projections are just disregarded. in: lm.fit(x, y, offset = offset, singular.ok = singular.ok, ...) " Can anybody clarify this ? I don't seem to find any pointer to what this might

Sorry for the cross post, but this is an important one potentially affecting all recipients. This just crossed the Full Disclosure mailman moderated mailing list. It bears a careful read, and thought about whether a response is needed. The implication is that if there is any use of a mailman password in common with a password you 'care' about, you need to take appropriate action at

Dear list subscriber (R-Core), there is a minor typo in the Windows specific NEWS for R 2.9.0: http://cran.at.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/CHANGES.R-2.9.0 There is no function 'memory.limits() but memory.limit() (see below). Secondly, I am kind of irritated by the function's behaviour. It returns an Error, but as it seems the memory limit is set according to the numeric value for

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=623 Summary: ssh, ssh-keygen and possibly others do not honour $HOME Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.6.1p2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=617 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID Summary|/etc/services disregarded |sshd binds to port 6010

You've probably already seen the latest sendmail vulnerability. http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2003-September/010287.html I believe you can apply the following patch to any of the security branches: http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/src/contrib/sendmail/src/parseaddr.c.diff?r1=1.1.1.17&r2=1.1.1.18 Download the patch and: # cd /usr/src # patch -p1 < /path/to/patch #

You've probably already seen the latest sendmail vulnerability. http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2003-September/010287.html I believe you can apply the following patch to any of the security branches: http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/src/contrib/sendmail/src/parseaddr.c.diff?r1=1.1.1.17&r2=1.1.1.18 Download the patch and: # cd /usr/src # patch -p1 < /path/to/patch #

Hello all, I'm having a very strange problem with Samba. I have a PC running the samba server and a PC running the client. On both PC's I am running the same application where I want some file access to be blocked if any of the applications is using it. Good idea right? I'm using fcntl to set and get the lock status of the files as is well documented in a gazzilion pages about

I got a packet capture of one of the SSH2 sessions trying to log in as a couple of illegal usernames. The contents of one packet suggests an attempt to buffer overflow the SSH server; ethereal's SSH decoding says "overly large value". It didn't seem to work against my system (I see no strange processes running; all files changed in past ten days look normal). I am

Hi all, I'm having a small problem with browsing. I've got a network full of Windows (2000 and XP) machines and I've installed a Samba server in it. The server is configured to be Domain Master Browser (DMB), Local Master Browser (LMB) and WINS server for a workgroup. The Win machines are configured to use the WINS server. Name resolution works perfectly, but browsing

I am not sure how this works in other countries, but in Australia - according to Telstra - the caller id is managed by the terminating device which is the telephone. If the caller id has been flagged as a silent number then generally the caller id is not display, but rather display with an alternative message 'Number Withheld' or 'Private' or whatever. Right now every

Hi Everyone, I have got CentOS 64bit running on a Dell PowerEdge SC1850 with hardware raid 1. My LVM partions donot seem to honour chown commands for symbolic links. Is this normal? All other files and directories honour it.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=615 Summary: OpenSSH 3.6.1p2 ON SCO 3.2v4.2 + STRICTMODES -->yes Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.6.1p2 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |463 ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2003-05-17 15:18 ------- Scott Burch found a bug in the PAM+PrivSep case

CentOS 7.5 image running on linode. unbound running on localhost. Have to use a cron job once a minute to keep /etc/resolv.conf using the localhost for name resolution - whenever NetworkManager gets restarted (usually only a system boot) it gets over-written. It seems every distro has a different way of preventing NetworkManager from replacing that file. I found instructions for Fedora that

Hi, There's been a wave of questions on Asterisk lists about phones that work well with Asterisk, services, etc. This week's VUC is all about sharing your experience with various equipment and service providers. The call begins on Friday at around 12 noon EST (9AM PST, 5PM GMT). Info, recordings: http://voipusersconference.org IRC: #vuc Freenode.net (or http://vuc.me/irc) - Local times:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 6 Jun 2017, Malte Schmidt wrote: > pass_filter = (&(objectClass=posixAccount)(uid=%u)(service=%s)) > > Thats pretty cool. Now, in the LDAP-settings I created corresponding > fields (service) and added the allowed services to tthese fields (imap, > pop3, etc.). > After that change, certain services were not available to

On 06/06/2017 03:18 PM, Steffen Kaiser wrote: > (!(service=%s)) > > or better name this attribute > > deniedService Thanks, this is quite helpful already. Regarding the other question about all the services that can be used there, I tried to grep the source code for certain keywords but could not really find anything useful with "service", "services" and some