similar to: Rack content-length Rack::Lint::LintErrors errors with unicorn

Installing from RubyGems.org: gem install --pre unicorn >From db919d18e01f6b2339915cbd057fba9dc040988b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Wong <normalperson at yhbt.net> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 21:02:55 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] unicorn 4.6.0pre1 - hijacking support This pre-release adds hijacking support for Rack 1.5 users. See Rack documentation for more information about hijacking.

Hi All, as I can see on https://github.com/defunkt/unicorn/blob/master/lib/unicorn.rb#L53 the?Rack::CommonLogger used only in development env and in weird evn called "deployment". Any chance to add "production" to this case? Serg Podtynnyi

All of a sudden, I''m getting this error: 1) Error: test_index(AccountControllerTest): RuntimeError: The number of parameters does not match the number of substitutions. /home/joe/projects/tanga/trunk/config/../vendor/rails/actionpack/lib/action_controller/assertions.rb:92:in `assert_redirected_to''

I''m running unicorn and unicorn-rails 0.96.1 and the latest Rails 3 beta gem. ?Firing up unicorn_rails spews "RAILS_ENV not defined by config/boot". ?I know this is likely a result of RAILS_ROOT being deprecated?in Rails 3 but I can''t seem to config my way around it. I''m sure other people must have run into this before. ?Is there a quick fix? Thanks

Hey guys, Started running unicorn in a production server like two weeks ago. It''s been running smoothly, but looking at the logs found 44 exceptions like this: E, [2010-06-02T16:17:15.117071 #22680] ERROR -- : Read error: #<TypeError: can''t modify frozen string> E, [2010-06-02T16:17:15.117270 #22680] ERROR -- :

http://www.tanga.com is where it''s at. We''re planning on open sourcing the e-commerce bits of it sometime in the near future. Any suggestions on how to best do that? (plugin? generator?) A non-video game will be offered for sale at 7 pm PST on Monday, btw. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Changes: Rewindable "rack.input" may be disabled via the "rewindable_input false" directive in the configuration file. This will violate Rack::Lint for Rack 1.x applications, but can reduce I/O for applications that do not need a rewindable input. This release updates us to the Kgio 2.x series which should play more nicely with other libraries and applications. There are

These are lines from a local dev log. Notice the two identical (except for time taken) entries for the requests. Every request has two entries with the 2nd entry taking longer. This is a dev environment so the .css is referenced. On the server this same app is doing the same thing. Any ideas? Is it bug in my code? I, [2012-01-14T10:54:09.089535 #34573] INFO -- : listening on addr=0.0.0.0:8080

We''ve been running unicorn-3.6.2 on REE 1.8.7 2011.12 in production for quite some time and we use monit to monitor each unicorn worker. Occasionally, I''ll get a notification that a worker has timed-out and has been re-spawned. In all these cases, when I look at the rails logs, I can see the last request that the worker handled, and they all have appeared to complete

Hi, This morning, while checking for a correct deployment, we found out that the Unicorns we are using were sending 500 Internal errors very frequently to the HAProxy that sits in front of them. After some investigation, It turned out that HAProxy checks the backend by opening and closing a connection to the unicorn. Unfortunately the Unicorns we use ( v 0.990.0 ) will try to reply to this probe

If unicorn doesn''t get terminated cleanly (for example if the machine has its power interrupted) and the pid in the pidfile gets used by another process, the current unicorn code will exit and not start a server. This tiny patch fixes that behaviour. --- lib/unicorn/http_server.rb | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/unicorn/http_server.rb

Hi, A couple days ago, I was trying to run Unicorn for Ramaze, and found that `Unicorn.run'' didn''t share the same interface with other Rack handlers, i.e. `options[:Host]'' and `options[:Port]'' Because of this, I can''t just use: Rack::Handler.register(''unicorn'', ''Unicorn'') And invoke this:

hi. i''ve been trying to upgrade my stack to ruby 2.0 but keep getting this on ubuntu (not on my local os x): /hello/shared/bundle/ruby/2.0.0/gems/unicorn-4.6.3/lib/unicorn/http_server.rb:746:in `for_fd'': Bad file descriptor (Errno::EBADF) from /hello/shared/bundle/ruby/2.0.0/gems/unicorn-4.6.3/lib/unicorn/http_server.rb:746:in `block in inherit_listeners!'' from

I''m getting the following errors multiple times per request when using 4.3.0. I do not receive any errors when using 4.2.1. Please CC me on replies, I''m not subscribed to the mailing list. 16:48:42 web.1 | E, [2012-04-26T16:48:42.733954 #87940] ERROR -- : app error: Socket is not connected (Errno::ENOTCONN) 16:48:42 web.1 | E, [2012-04-26T16:48:42.734193 #87940] ERROR

This renables the ability for Ruby 1.8 environments to perform reexecs --- lib/unicorn/http_server.rb | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/unicorn/http_server.rb b/lib/unicorn/http_server.rb index 2decd77..9a5795c 100644 --- a/lib/unicorn/http_server.rb +++ b/lib/unicorn/http_server.rb @@ -449,13 +449,14 @@ class Unicorn::HttpServer end

Strange error which took down my server today: Unhandled listen loop exception #<Errno::EMFILE: Too many open files - accept>. /usr/local/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7-2010.01/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/unicorn-3.3.1/lib/unicorn/http_server.rb:606:in `kgio_tryaccept'' /usr/local/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7-2010.01/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/unicorn-3.3.1/lib/unicorn/http_server.rb:606:in

Hello all, Last week, I finally decided to put into motion some ideas I''ve been kicking around for a year in my head since last year... Basically I don''t want to have to deal with threads or support platforms that rely on or encourage threads. Especially given MRI 1.9 where kernel threads are more difficult to debug than green ones. Given the limited scope of this project,

Hi I''ve migrated from Passenger to Unicorn about a week ago. It''s great. Great transparency and management, thanks for this great software! A few of my Rails applications start background jobs using Kernel#fork. Of course, the ActiveRecord connections are closed and reopened again in the parent and child processes. The child process also does its job. Unfortunately, it seems

Hello! Can anyone explain why my Unicorn installation (for RoR site) have so many worker threads? * screenshot: http://i.stack.imgur.com/U9TFR.png * unicorn.rb: https://gist.github.com/907th/4995323 Thanks!

Hello all, I''m wondering if you deploy nginx: 1) on the same machine that runs unicorn (exclusively proxying to that) 2) on a different machine that doesn''t run unicorn 3) both, nginx could forward to either to localhost or another host on the same LAN And of course, the reason(s) you chose what you chose. I''m inclined to believe many folks are on 1) simply