similar to: unicorn 1.0.0 - yes, this is a real project

Hi all, Some of you are wondering about the future of the project, especially since we''re nearing a 1.0 release. == 1.x - bugfixes and Rack-compatibility synchronization The 1.x series will focus mainly on bug fixes and compatibility with Rack as it evolves. If Rack drops the rewindability requirement of "rack.input", Unicorn will follow ASAP and allow TeeInput to be

Installing from RubyGems.org: gem install --pre unicorn >From db919d18e01f6b2339915cbd057fba9dc040988b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Wong <normalperson at yhbt.net> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 21:02:55 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] unicorn 4.6.0pre1 - hijacking support This pre-release adds hijacking support for Rack 1.5 users. See Rack documentation for more information about hijacking.

Hi there, I would like to config Monit to monitor our production-unicorn-workers What memory size would you recommend to be the maximum reachable for a worker? so Monit can restart it. Thanks a lot ! Manuel Palenciano

Hi, A couple days ago, I was trying to run Unicorn for Ramaze, and found that `Unicorn.run'' didn''t share the same interface with other Rack handlers, i.e. `options[:Host]'' and `options[:Port]'' Because of this, I can''t just use: Rack::Handler.register(''unicorn'', ''Unicorn'') And invoke this:

Hi All, as I can see on https://github.com/defunkt/unicorn/blob/master/lib/unicorn.rb#L53 the?Rack::CommonLogger used only in development env and in weird evn called "deployment". Any chance to add "production" to this case? Serg Podtynnyi

For example, I have a webapp that handles /welcome. Does unicorn support to mount the entire webapp at /prefix so request to /prefix/welcome are?handled?

Has anyone seen anything like this before? I can get it to happen all the time if I issue a HEAD request, but it only happens very intermittently on GET requests. I''m using Ruby 1.9.2p180. Any ideas on where to start debugging? 204.93.223.151, 10.195.114.81 - - [11/Aug/2011 21:03:50] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 37902 0.5316 app error: Content-Length header was 37902, but should be

Hi, I''m trying to use unicorn in a test deployment of a Rails app that uses Mongoid, so Activerecord isn''t included in the app. When I start unicorn through Capistrano though, the stderr log fills up endlessly with identical ActiveRecord-related errors: I, [2012-12-05T04:19:25.375952 #5096] INFO -- : Refreshing Gem list I, [2012-12-05T04:19:32.941249 #5096] INFO -- :

Hi, For one of our apps we switched to unicorn from mongrel. The unicorn server use to run behind an apache with timeout of 300sec, as sometime the customer may do a large file upload. After we made the switch we started getting lots of Unicorn::ClientShutdown occurred in photos#flash_upload bytes_read=2762663 (pr some other number) We were not able to recreate it in our tests, but support was

Switched my RoR (3.1.3, 1.9.2) app from Thin to Unicorn (4.6.2). It ran fine in development (Mac OSX), but when deploying to production on Heroku, it fails silently (no backtrace, no error detail). Log looks like: Starting process with command `bundle exec unicorn start -p 6069 -c ./config/unicorn.rb` /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/1.9.1/gems/unicorn-4.6.2/lib/unicorn/configurator.rb:634:in

Streaming works with Unicorn + Apache. Both with and without deflating. My understanding is that Unicorn + Apache is not a good combination though because Apache does not buffer, and thus Unicorn has no fast client in front. (I don''t know which is the ultimate technical reason Unicorn puts such an emphasis on fast clients, but will do some research about it.) I have seen in

Hello all, Last week, I finally decided to put into motion some ideas I''ve been kicking around for a year in my head since last year... Basically I don''t want to have to deal with threads or support platforms that rely on or encourage threads. Especially given MRI 1.9 where kernel threads are more difficult to debug than green ones. Given the limited scope of this project,

I''m putting together a small web frontend for a client to upload files into an existing application. It''s trivial - there will never be more than a (small) handful of concurrent connections, but I need a streaming rack.input for upload progress on files up to 500MB or so. I was planning on using Rainbows! with ThreadSpawn and worker_connections=1, then noticed that unicorn is

Hello all, I have always deploys rails apps with unicorn and nginx as a reverse proxy in the past. However, I am working with a new firm and they would like to use Apache with mod_pagespeed in front of unicorn. We will be deploying a rails 3.1 app with streaming. To me, mod_pagespeed does not seem like a magic bullet, as it appears to be a collection of best practices which have to be rewritten

Hello. Some time ago I committed a Rubinius assembly-based HTTP parser generated from Ragel to the Rubinius git repository. Yesterday I made a Mongrel gem which installs and works on Rubinius. This basically involved commenting out anything to do with fastthread or the http11 C extension. If there''s interest in releasing a Rubinius-targeted gem, I can make changes to the Rakefile to

Changes: Rewindable "rack.input" may be disabled via the "rewindable_input false" directive in the configuration file. This will violate Rack::Lint for Rack 1.x applications, but can reduce I/O for applications that do not need a rewindable input. This release updates us to the Kgio 2.x series which should play more nicely with other libraries and applications. There are

Before anything else, let me state this: Of course it''s going to be PAINFULLY slow on MRI. That''s not the point :) I thought I''d try out writing out a Ruby version of the parser for the purposes of Rubinius. For those of you who aren''t aware, Ragel supports a goto-driven FSM on Rubinius by injecting assembly directly, and Rubinus head honcho guy Evan Phoenix

Hello, In Rubinius we're seeing an occasional crash inside LLVM that always happens inside getenv(), which is used for example when creating a MCContext (inside lib/MC/MCContext.cpp, it checks getenv("AS_SECURE_LOG_FILE")). The problem is that getenv() and friends aren't thread safe and Rubinius provides a multithreaded system. We can relatively easily get locking setup around

Hello all, I''m wondering if you deploy nginx: 1) on the same machine that runs unicorn (exclusively proxying to that) 2) on a different machine that doesn''t run unicorn 3) both, nginx could forward to either to localhost or another host on the same LAN And of course, the reason(s) you chose what you chose. I''m inclined to believe many folks are on 1) simply

Hi all, I''ve just pushed out some changes to the C HTTP parser that should make it compatible with a recent Rubinius[1] using the C API. While I got the http_parser and http_parser_ng tests to pass with the new changes, most of the other tests that use pure Ruby actually failed(!). If anybody wants to pick up where I left off (even if it''s to properly report bugs to the