similar to: [PATCH] Add worker interrogation via INFO signals

Hey guys, Started running unicorn in a production server like two weeks ago. It''s been running smoothly, but looking at the logs found 44 exceptions like this: E, [2010-06-02T16:17:15.117071 #22680] ERROR -- : Read error: #<TypeError: can''t modify frozen string> E, [2010-06-02T16:17:15.117270 #22680] ERROR -- :

Hi All, as I can see on https://github.com/defunkt/unicorn/blob/master/lib/unicorn.rb#L53 the?Rack::CommonLogger used only in development env and in weird evn called "deployment". Any chance to add "production" to this case? Serg Podtynnyi

I''ve been analyzing our Unicorn-powered Rails app''s performance, and have found that garbage collection is a big factor in slow requests. In the interest of avoiding those performance hits while handling requests, would it be possible to have a unicorn worker run garbage collection after handling a request and before waiting for the next one? Would this be a good idea? Cheers,

Has anyone seen anything like this before? I can get it to happen all the time if I issue a HEAD request, but it only happens very intermittently on GET requests. I''m using Ruby 1.9.2p180. Any ideas on where to start debugging? 204.93.223.151, 10.195.114.81 - - [11/Aug/2011 21:03:50] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 37902 0.5316 app error: Content-Length header was 37902, but should be

Hi I''ve migrated from Passenger to Unicorn about a week ago. It''s great. Great transparency and management, thanks for this great software! A few of my Rails applications start background jobs using Kernel#fork. Of course, the ActiveRecord connections are closed and reopened again in the parent and child processes. The child process also does its job. Unfortunately, it seems

Hi, unicorn unconditionally sets rack.multiprocess to true in the Rack environment. The Rack spec [0] says the following about the variable: "true if an equivalent application object may be simultaneously invoked by another process, false otherwise." When unicorn is running with a single worker this does not hold so what do you think about setting the variable to false when only a

Eric, think I came across an issue with the parser in unicorn, with a request (due to 2 layers of nginx proxying) coming across with both a X_FORWARDED_PROTO and a X-Forwarded-Proto header. From the socket (in HttpRequest) - we get: X_FORWARDED_PROTO: http X-Forwarded-Proto: https which is parsed to HTTP_X_FORWARDED_PROTO"=>"http,https There was a passenger ticket that

Two ideas, one more controversial than the other. First: auto-killing bloated workers.?My current app has some memory leakage that wasn''t really visible on our older passenger setup, since the auto-scaling meant that bloated workers got killed periodically. In a perfect world, we''d find and patch all of the leaks, but in the meantime (and as a safety net) I''d like to get

Hello, I''m using unicorn since a while, but now I try to run it the first time inside a FreeBSD jail. The initial start of unicorn works fine and it serves all the requests. But if I want to restart it using the USR2 signal, it (more or less) slowly starts using more and more CPU cycles. There is no error message in the logs and it quite hard to reproduce that error. In 1 of 20 tries,

In case more people are interested, I originally posted the following to ruby-core: http://mid.gmane.org/20101210190448.GA6534 at dcvr.yhbt.net Eric Wong <normalperson at yhbt.net> wrote: > zuerrong <zuerrong at gmail.com> wrote: > > 2010/12/10 Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri at medioh.com>: > > > And Unicorns are fantastical mythical creatures! > > > >

Installing from RubyGems.org: gem install --pre unicorn >From db919d18e01f6b2339915cbd057fba9dc040988b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Wong <normalperson at yhbt.net> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 21:02:55 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] unicorn 4.6.0pre1 - hijacking support This pre-release adds hijacking support for Rack 1.5 users. See Rack documentation for more information about hijacking.

I would love to see a timestamp in each line of unicorn stderr and stdout logs. Has this been considered? Thanks. Best, alex sharp

Is there a way to get the number of requests that are currently awaiting to be executed by my rails app by unicorn? Or there is no queue in unicorn and I should look for this information somewhere in nginx or other front-end server? Couldn''t find much information about this topic, so decided to ask here first.

--- lib/unicorn/configurator.rb | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- lib/unicorn/http_server.rb | 3 +++ test/unit/test_configurator.rb | 8 ++++++++ 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/unicorn/configurator.rb b/lib/unicorn/configurator.rb index 0d0eac7..a0ae576 100644 --- a/lib/unicorn/configurator.rb +++ b/lib/unicorn/configurator.rb @@ -441,9 +441,22 @@ class

Hi, i''m trying to start up unicorn_rails with a rails 3 beta3 project. All I can get out of it is this: I, [2010-05-28T08:54:45.770957 #17852] INFO -- : reaped #<Process::Status: pid 17854 exit 1> worker=0 I, [2010-05-28T08:54:45.771200 #17852] INFO -- : worker=0 spawning... I, [2010-05-28T08:54:45.774049 #17858] INFO -- : worker=0 spawned pid=17858 I,

Hi all, I am trying to reproduce rails 3.2 behaviour with fields_for and nested attributes. class ControllerAction < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :interactions, dependent: :destroy has_many :roles, through: :interactions scope :controllers, lambda {|name| where("controller_name_id = ?", name)} scope :actions, lambda {|name| where("action_name_id =

Hi folks On line #63 of unicorn/http_response.rb a "Status" header is written to the socket. A comment in the code explains that some broken clients require this header and unicorn generously accommodates them. We?re having the opposite problem. One of our clients using Microsoft Windows and ASP haven?t been able to connect to our HTTP API since we moved it to unicorn from passenger.

Hi there, I would like to config Monit to monitor our production-unicorn-workers What memory size would you recommend to be the maximum reachable for a worker? so Monit can restart it. Thanks a lot ! Manuel Palenciano

These are lines from a local dev log. Notice the two identical (except for time taken) entries for the requests. Every request has two entries with the 2nd entry taking longer. This is a dev environment so the .css is referenced. On the server this same app is doing the same thing. Any ideas? Is it bug in my code? I, [2012-01-14T10:54:09.089535 #34573] INFO -- : listening on addr=0.0.0.0:8080

Strange error which took down my server today: Unhandled listen loop exception #<Errno::EMFILE: Too many open files - accept>. /usr/local/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7-2010.01/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/unicorn-3.3.1/lib/unicorn/http_server.rb:606:in `kgio_tryaccept'' /usr/local/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7-2010.01/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/unicorn-3.3.1/lib/unicorn/http_server.rb:606:in