similar to: CentOS 4.3 for ppc32

I need to update a CentOS 4.0 system to CentOS 4.3. In my opinion, I should start out with a "yum update yum centos-yumconf" and then follow that with a "yum update". Does anyone have any other input as to what other packages might be needed to be updated with yum and centos-yumconf before the mass upgrade? Thanks, Barry

Is anyone successfully using a Belkin F5D6050 USB Wireless in CentOS 4.2? If so, what driver are you using? Did you have to do anything special to make it work? At this point, I have downloaded, compiled installed and loaded the latest drivers from http://atmelwlandriver.sourceforge.net but lvnet is unable to find my adapter. I've tried every driver module that it created, and still no

Hello, we have enabled yum-updatesd on our dozen real and virtual machines running CentOS 5.2 some time ago and are very satisfied: afarber at ablsw01:~> grep -v ^# /etc/yum/yum-updatesd.conf [main] run_interval = 7200 updaterefresh = 1200 emit_via = email dbus_listener = no do_update = yes do_download = yes do_download_deps = yes (it would be good to make it use the proxy though...) My

I am going to be setting up an Intel 2200bg card this evening. I was wondering if anyone is using this (successfully) with CentOS 4. The directions look straightforward, but please let me know if you had to do anything interesting/undocumented to make it work. I am also wondering if people are using the driver provided with the current CentOS 4 kernel or if people are using the most recent

Thank you so much!!! It worked. On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Barry Brimer <lists at brimer.org> wrote: > Thanks for reply. >> >> I replaced break=y with init=/bin/sh. >> In that case case system just hangs with the following message. >> "Freeing unused kernel memory : 400k freed". >> >> Thanks!! >> Sachin >> >> On Tue,

--NoDisclaim-- I cant use an editor to mass update and change usernames as this is a part of an automatic useradd routine written in an ancient legacy application which calls useradd and usermod, we have been using this software for more than 15 years, so its hard for me to argue for a rewrite, so im forced to bend the OS instead it isnt a problem on redhat 8.0, so somewhere in the patches for

Has anyone been able to install centericq 4.21.0 on CentOS 4? I've been unable to install the binary rpm from the centericq site. I've also been unable to correctly rebuild the source rpm on CentOS 4 as well. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Barry

Thanks for reply. I replaced break=y with init=/bin/sh. In that case case system just hangs with the following message. "Freeing unused kernel memory : 400k freed". Thanks!! Sachin On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Barry Brimer <lists at brimer.org> wrote: > My grub.conf is as following. >> >> title Linux Init Break >> kernel /vmlinuz root=/dev/sda6 ro

Has anyone been successful at using the TARPIT target in iptables under CentOS 4? I am using CentOS 4.3, fully updated with iptables-1.2.11-3.1.RHEL4 and kernel-2.6.9-34.107.plus.c4 Doing a locate on TARPIT returns: # locate TARPIT /lib/iptables/libipt_TARPIT.so This makes me think that the TARPIT target would be valid, however when I try to use it, I get the following reponse: # iptables

On 08/11/2016 11:07 PM, Barry Brimer wrote: > > On Fri, 12 Aug 2016, Peter wrote: > >> On 12/08/16 17:56, Barry Brimer wrote: >>>> [root at vps ~]# uname -r >>>> 2.6.32-042stab108.7 >>> >>> Not needed. This affects 3.6+ kernels. You don't have one of those. >> >> It affects RHEL6 which runs 2.6.32, they backported the

Are there plans to release kernel-2.6.9-67.0.15.plus.c4.i586.rpm ?? Thanks, Barry

Hello, I am currently facing an issue at linking stage when compiling basic C code for an embedded PPC32 platform and linking with LLD. For external symbol linkage LLVM appears to use PLT which results in generating a R_PPC_PLTREL24 relocation, that is not support by LDD. Therefore even such a basic example cannot be built: /* s.c */ int f() { return 0; } /* t.c */ int f(); int _start() {

On 12/08/16 17:56, Barry Brimer wrote: >> [root at vps ~]# uname -r >> 2.6.32-042stab108.7 > > Not needed. This affects 3.6+ kernels. You don't have one of those. It affects RHEL6 which runs 2.6.32, they backported the features that it affects. If the above openvz kernel was based on a RHEL6 kernel (and I'd guess it was) then it's affected. Peter

Can anyone tell me how the ppc32 version of CentOS-4 is coming along? Thanks, Barry

Does anyone have any news about the PPC32 release of CentOS 4? Thanks, Barry

Hal, I very well understand that LDD may not be in a good state for PPC32, and it would definitely need some improvements sooner or later. In fact I even submitted a patch adding a relocation to ldd just a few hours ago. However, this particular case is not related to LDD, it is a design issue and furthermore a regression in LLVM itself. I checked gcc, and neither does it try to use PLT and

On 03/06/2015 10:55 AM, Barry Brimer wrote: > > >> IPV6INIT="no" >> >> But I am still getting a global IPv6 (and of course local scope). >> >> What else do I need to do to disable the listening for RA announcements >> >> and setting an IPv6 global address? I do not want to reboot the box. > There are other modules, most notably bonding

On 5/5/2017 5:11 ??, Barry Brimer wrote: > Are the correct volumes referenced in your /etc/default/grub file? Thanks Barry for your feedback. Here is the output: http://iweb.noa.gr/files/centos7/scratchvm-data-20170505-01.png What can you tell from that? Cheers, Nick

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > > > On 03/06/2015 11:00 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >> >> >> On 03/06/2015 10:55 AM, Barry Brimer wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> IPV6INIT="no" >>>> >>>> But I am still getting a global IPv6 (and of course local scope).

I have a mail server that handles several domains. One of these domains has decided to use Postini. For those not familiar with Postini, you set your MX records to use their mail servers. They filter mail, and deliver you only the clean virus/spam free mail. The idea is to only allow incoming mail from their mail servers so spammers are unable to send to your mail server directly. This is