similar to: Multiple time series with zoo

Thanks everyone for you help with my last question, and now I have one last one... Here is a sample of my data in .csv format site,time_local,time_utc,reef_type_code,sensor_type,sensor_depth_m,temperature_c 06,2006-04-09 10:20:00,2006-04-09 20:20:00,BAK,sb39, 2, 29.63 06,2006-04-09 10:40:00,2006-04-09 20:40:00,BAK,sb39, 2, 29.56 06,2006-04-09 11:00:00,2006-04-09 21:00:00,BAK,sb39, 2, 29.51

New user here. My goal is pull daily averages from a long dataset. I've been working with some code I got from this list from https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2009-March/191302.html The code how I have been using it is as follows: library(zoo) library(chron) DB<-read.table("/Users/me/Desktop/R/data.csv", sep=",", header=TRUE, as.is =TRUE) z<-zoo(LTER6$temp,

Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> writes: > I'm not a huge fan of this because then you get to decide on a default > for all the ports, but I can understand if people want to move this > way to reduce uncertainty. FWIW, since it's one of the three targets Jim mentioned, -march=z10 is the obvious default for SystemZ. On the other hand, I think it's good to run

Dear All, I am trying to perform MANOVA. I have table with 504 columns(species) and 36 rows) with two grouping (season and location) Zx <- Z[c(4:504)] Zxm <- as.matrix(Z) m<- manova(Zxm~Season*location, data=Z) when I do summary.aov, I get respond for each species but summary.manova summary.manova(m) :" residuals have rank" 24<501. What can it be the reason for this error

Dear guRus: I am using lmer for a mixed model that includes a random intercept for a set of effects that have the same distribution, Normal(0, sig2b). This set of effects is of variable size, so I am using an as.formula statement to create the formula for lmer. For example, if the set of random effects has dimension 8, then the lmer call is: Zs<-

On the server [root@bangvmpllDA02 logs]# ruby -v ruby 1.8.7 (2011-06-30 patchlevel 352) [x86_64-linux] [root@bangvmpllDA02 logs]# puppet --version 3.0.1 and [root@bangvmpllDA02 logs]# service nginx configtest nginx: the configuration file /apps/nginx/nginx.conf syntax is ok nginx: configuration file /apps/nginx/nginx.conf test is successful [root@bangvmpllDA02 logs]# service nginx status

Hello, I'd like to propose the addition of a new SystemZ backend to the LLVM and Clang code base. We're interested in this for the same reason we've been interested in the PowerPC back-end recently: to enable packages in upcoming enterprise Linux distributions that need LLVM support (e.g. 3D desktop support via llvmpipe). Now, I understand that a SystemZ backend used to be part of

All, Currently the X86 backend does CPU auto-detection and subtarget feature detection when the TargetMachine is created if no explicit CPU was specified. It's counterintuitive for low level tools like ‘llc’ to do this, as it means the same .ll file compiled on heterogenous machines generates different results from the same ‘llc’ command line. It is still useful to be able to opt-in to such

> I'd like to propose the addition of a new SystemZ backend to the LLVM and > Clang code base. We're interested in this for the same reason we've been > interested in the PowerPC back-end recently: to enable packages in upcoming > enterprise Linux distributions that need LLVM support (e.g. 3D desktop > support via llvmpipe). Cool! > - focus on feature completeness

Changes with nginx 1.2.7 12 Feb 2013 *) Change: now if the "include" directive with mask is used on Unix systems, included files are sorted in alphabetical order. *) Change: the "add_header" directive adds headers to 201 responses. *) Feature: the "geo" directive now supports IPv6 addresses in CIDR

Hi All, I am setting up puppetmaster with nginx and passenger and separating the Puppetmaster primary CA server. I have 3 host loadbalancer01 - Nginx doing LB on IP address and also running puppetmaster with passenger under 127.0.0.1 (port 8140). primaryca - Puppetmaster Primary CA pclient - Puppet Client The did the following steps: On Primary CA server: ---------------------------- cd

>>Taddei Herve Com MD PD SWC 3 MCH 23 <herve.taddei@siemens.com><<< Wow!!! it seems that Siemens got an eye over speex ;-).... What other company is watching this closely at speex??? :-D just curious.... John Villar Gerente de Proyectos Computadores Flor Hard Soft 2058 C.A. www.florhard.com Taddei Herve Com MD PD SWC 3 MCH 23 wrote: >I will be back in the office on

Hi, I'd like to run regsubsets for model selection by exhaustive search. I have a list with 20 potential explanatory variables, which represent the real and the imaginary parts of 10 "kinds" of complex numbers: x <- list(r1=r1, r2=r2, r3=r3, ..., r10=r10, i1=i1, i2=i2, i3=i3, ..., i10=i10) Is there an easy way to constrain the model search so that "r"s and

R-devel, The performance of as.Date differs by a large degree between one of my machines with glibc 2.3.2: > system.time(x <- as.Date(rep("01-01-2005", 100000), format = "%m-%d-%Y")) [1] 1.17 0.00 1.18 0.00 0.00 and a comparable machine with glibc 2.3.3: > system.time(x <- as.Date(rep("01-01-2005", 100000), format = "%m-%d-%Y")) [1] 31.20

For the life of me I couldn't work out what to searc I have an m*n numeric matrix x and a numeric vector y (of length m+n-1) How do I do a calculation like this? z[i,j] = x[i,j] * y[i+j] ? Well, one can write a pair of loops, or write a single loop within which we calculate a vector at a time, but ... is there a "neat" way to do it? tiny example:

Dear everyone, The in-progress release notes for 3.7 [1,2] make it look like we didn't do very much over the past six months. Obviously that's not the case at all, so let's get them in shape! If you've been thinking "I should probably add this to the release notes at some point", now is the time :-) I have a list below of changes that might be worth mentioning. I

Today I've been trying to get dovecot (1.0 rc2) to use certificates for client side authentication. If my memory serves right, beta8 had no problems with it (although it was some time ago and on different machine). Similar setup works perfectly well for postfix (for authentication that is, on the same machine). Originally I thought I overdid some certificate settings (keyUsage, nsCertType,

On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 15:16 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 14:02 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 12:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > > Ralf, et al., > > > > > > Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev > > > has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains > >

On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 14:02 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 12:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > Ralf, et al., > > > > Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev > > has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains > > additional benchmark results. > > > > First, these are preliminary

Many thanks! On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand at de.ibm.com> wrote: > LLVM: > > LLVM no longer attempts to automatically detect the > current host CPU when invoked natively. > > LLVM now supports all thread-local storage models on SystemZ. > (Previous releases would support only the local-exec TLS model.) > > LLVM now uses the POPCNT