similar to: [GIT PULL] NTFS readonly file system support

From: Nicolas Cornu <ncornu at aldebaran.com> --- mtools/Makefile | 1 + mtools/syslinux.c | 59 +------------------------------------------------------ 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-) diff --git a/mtools/Makefile b/mtools/Makefile index 0d0b1b2..c980420 100755 --- a/mtools/Makefile +++ b/mtools/Makefile @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ SRCS = syslinux.c \

The following changes since commit 868c474546ba68e9e448734e1833f873fd50ec0a: diskstart: Add a pointer to the syslinux_banner to the EPA (2011-04-04 17:40:59 -0700) are available in the git repository at: git://github.com/pcacjr/syslinux.git syslinux-update-for-hpa Paulo Alcantara (4): libinstaller: implement syslinux_already_installed extlinux: use syslinux_already_installed

This is part of some patches to support sectors > 512. Currently I'm able to boot a Ubuntu kernel but seems that mboot is not working for some reason. This patch try to fix first stage of extlinux bootloader but have some problems with ADV Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <frediano.ziglio at citrix.com> --- dos/syslinux.c | 2 +- extlinux/main.c | 36

Hi Shao, On 2016.02.24 23:43, Shao Miller via Syslinux wrote: > Did you happen to notice anything unusual when compiling with MinGW > under Linux, once 'ok' was removed? I seem to recall warnings about > unused results, but not of unused objects. Maybe that's an incorrect > recollection or maybe it's ancient history, however. I got no warnings with the patch on

It's needed to enumerate both UFS1/2 since they have different magic numbers and super block offsets. Besides, UFS2 can be installed in the 0-64k range like BTRFS, whereas UFS1 can't. UFS2 has no cow feature unlike BTRFS. Signed-off-by: Raphael S.Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com> --- extlinux/main.c | 79 ++++++++++--- extlinux/ufs.h | 26 ++++

It's needed to enumerate both UFS1/2 since they have different magic numbers and super block offsets. Besides, UFS2 can be installed in the 0-64k range like BTRFS, whereas UFS1 can't. Signed-off-by: Raphael S.Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com> --- extlinux/main.c | 71 +++++++++--- extlinux/ufs.h | 26 ++++ extlinux/ufs_fs.h | 307

The following comment in win/syslinux.c seems fairly innocent: /* Map the file (is there a better way to do this?) */ So I?ve got an ?ntfssect? git repository going: http://git.zytor.com/?p=users/sha0/ntfssect.git;a=summary Hopefully Paulo can plug its functions into his NTFS working repository. It appears that we?ll have to take one path (in the Windows installer) for FAT and one path

Hello, all. I'm just wondering if it'd be possible to include symbol-stripped versions of win32/ntfstest/ntfstest.exe and win64/ntfstest/ntfstest.exe in future Syslinux releases. That way, users could use it while not burdening folks just doing a usual build of Syslinux. If not (scope creep?), no problem. - Shao Miller

file->offset is used to store position in index root between ntfs_readdir calls. Previously, pointer to buffer was stored in this field. However this buffer is reallocated and read each ntfs_readdir call so the pointer may become incorrect. Now offset in index root rather than pointer is stored in this field. Signed-off-by: Andy Alex <andy at r-tt.com> --- diff -uprN

file->offset is used to store position in index root between ntfs_readdir calls. Previously, pointer to buffer was stored in this field. However this buffer is reallocated and read each ntfs_readdir call so the pointer may become incorrect. Now offset in index root rather than pointer is stored in this field. Signed-off-by: Andy Alex <andy at r-tt.com> --- diff -uprN

The variable 'ok' is never used and generates a warning. Remove it. Also ntfssect.c is designed to be compiled in non Unicode mode when using MSVC compilers, so remove all ambiguity about it (LPCTSTR -> LPCSTR, use of 'A' API calls) so that it doesn't break when compiled in Unicode mode, which is what Rufus uses with MSVC. -------------- next part --------------

Hello, Happy New Year! These patches make syslinux/linux support ext2/3/4, and it doesn't require the root privilege, I'd like to add a separate e2fs/syslinux, if that is more appropriate, it should be easy to do that. I put these patches on github so that you can easily get them in case you'd like to test them. (The repo's name is sys_tmp, which avoids confusing others, I will

The _BSD_SOURCE was deprecated since glibc-2.20. _DEFAULT_SOURCE can be used instead of _BSD_SOURCE. However, there is no need to include _BSD_SOURCE because the sources only have inline functions and calls memcmp/cpy functions. Signed-off-by: Chanho Park <chanho61.park at samsung.com> --- dos/getsetsl.c | 1 - libinstaller/fs.c | 1 - libinstaller/syslxmod.c | 1 - 3 files

This patch changes only strings, no program code. It is would be nice if it goes in the 6.04 release. Reported-by: Ady <ady-sf at hotmail.com> How this patch was prepared, how the editting for this patch was done Where is auxiliary written with double l? git grep -i auxilliary Which files are effect git grep -li auxilliary Changing the those files with the streaming editor sed

The _BSD_SOURCE was deprecated since glibc-2.20. _DEFAULT_SOURCE can be used instead of _BSD_SOURCE. However, there is no need to include _BSD_SOURCE because the sources only have inline functions and calls memcmp/cpy functions. Signed-off-by: Chanho Park <chanho61.park at samsung.com> --- dos/getsetsl.c | 1 - libinstaller/fs.c | 1 - libinstaller/syslxmod.c | 1 - 3 files

_BSD_SOURCE was deprecated in favour of _DEFAULT_SOURCE since glibc 2.20[1]. To avoid build warning on glibc2.20, _DEFAULT_SOURCE should also be defined. [1]: https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/2.20 Signed-off-by: Chanho Park <chanho61.park at samsung.com> --- dos/getsetsl.c | 2 ++ libinstaller/fs.c | 2 ++ libinstaller/syslxmod.c | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 6

--- extlinux/main.c | 9 ++++++++- libinstaller/syslxopt.c | 8 +++++++- libinstaller/syslxopt.h | 1 + man/extlinux.1 | 3 +++ 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/extlinux/main.c b/extlinux/main.c index 0669bb9..8a0ac63 100644 --- a/extlinux/main.c +++ b/extlinux/main.c @@ -381,6 +381,13 @@ int modify_adv(void) rv = -1; } } +

hello everybody, apologies if I'm missing something here Just tried to build 6.04-pre1 test version with: make bios installer and found some problems all (seemingly) related to inaccurate paths in various Makefiles. I enclose a complete patch at the end of this email, which details the problems I found and how they got fixed for me. As an example, this is the first error I got:

We support both device and directory as the target now. Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang at windriver.com> --- libinstaller/syslxopt.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/libinstaller/syslxopt.c b/libinstaller/syslxopt.c index 3fc5519..d06719f 100644 --- a/libinstaller/syslxopt.c +++ b/libinstaller/syslxopt.c @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ void __attribute__

This set of patches add some support for sector size >512. Currently it fixes extlinux, MBR for GPT and ext partitions. Other code is unaffected. This set of patches has been tested on a read Dell machine running a beta firmware.