similar to: chain.c32 map argument patch

Hi, I have coded a function to parse a string to map BIOS drives to other BIOS drives. I need such functionality because I want to chainload grub from syslinux on a USB flash drive. The drive is considered a floppy disk by my BIOS, yet it's MSDOS partitioned, and grub can't handle partitions on floppy disks (hence my desire to fake 0x80 being 0x00). The function can map a string of

Vijay Daultani wrote: > Respected Sir/Madam, > > As I was developing some part of compiler for a project. I require grammar > (BNF or EBNF) for converting the C code in the IR as it is not been > mentioned any where over your official website. I don't know what you mean by "converting the C code in the IR". Regardless, LLVM does not have BNF or EBNF forms (or any

I am curious how do you guys do it anyways? On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: > Vijay Daultani wrote: > >> Respected Sir/Madam, >> >> As I was developing some part of compiler for a project. I require grammar >> (BNF or EBNF) for converting the C code in the IR as it is not been >> mentioned any where over your

On Feb 3, 2013, at 10:45 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Jan 29, 2013, at 2:42 PM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: >> Executive Summary: >> >> The new syntax is: >> >> #0 = attributes { noinline align=4 "cpu"="cortex-a8" } >> #1 = attributes { attr = (val1 val2 val3) } >>

On Jan 29, 2013, at 2:42 PM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > Executive Summary: > > The new syntax is: > > #0 = attributes { noinline align=4 "cpu"="cortex-a8" } > #1 = attributes { attr = (val1 val2 val3) } > #bork = attributes { sspreq noredzone } > > define void @foo() #0 #bork { ret void } The general syntax LGTM. It

On Feb 3, 2013, at 12:55 PM, Bill Wending <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: >>> The 'align' and "cpu" attributes both have a value associated with them. The 'attr' attribute in '#1' has multiple values associated with it. (The BNF is below in the 'IR Changes' section.) Attribute groups with the same attributes in them, but in a different order,

On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 1:40 PM David Greene via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > > > But perhaps more importantly, as Hal states clearly, is the need for > > an official specification, similar to the one for LLVM IR, as well as > > a formal document with the expected semantics into

Please take a look at the attached patch. I updated the BNF and added comments in the code. On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > If you are changing the syntax, please update the BNF in the comments. > > --Sean Silva > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Akira Hatanaka <ahatanak at gmail.com> > wrote: > > The attached

Hi, all, very interested to ask if any one knows that there is a BNF like grammar to describe LLVM IR? Thanks, -jenny -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110102/b1eddac5/attachment.html>

Respected Sir/Madam, As I was developing some part of compiler for a project. I require grammar (BNF or EBNF) for converting the C code in the IR as it is not been mentioned any where over your official website. Awaiting for your help. Regards, Vijay Daultani. M.Tech student IIT Delhi

A long time ago, when I devised the grammar and structure of the Microsoft C++ name mangling scheme (decorated names), the document describing the object model and the name decoration scheme were made publically available. Perhaps this is still available publically, or perhaps Microsoft might be willing to share an up to date definition of the name-decoration grammar, especially in light of the

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 1:54 PM David Greene <greened at obbligato.org> wrote: > Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> writes: > > > Of course by its nature, MLIR doesn't lend itself to concrete semantic > >> descriptions, though I would expect the affine dialect (and others) to > >> have documentation on par with the LLVM IR. > > > > >

On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 12:49 PM Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > We have clang/lib/AST/MicrosoftMangle.cpp, so looks like what I should do > is to write code that do the reverse of it. One thing I should be careful > is to produce the exact same outputs as Microsoft's UnDecorateSymbolName > function would output so that the behavior doesn't

Hi! The rewrite of the attributes class is well underway. The next step is to add support for the expanded rôle of attributes in the language and IR. This is the final proposal for the language changes. There isn't a lot of new information except for the syntax changes for the new feature. Executive Summary: The new syntax is: #0 = attributes { noinline align=4

Hi folks, TableGen provides sufficiently rich syntax for expressing target instruction set. Nevertheless, when I wrote the PTX backend, I observed that some redundancy in TableGen can be further eliminated through macro expansion of for-loops. The semantics of a for-loop is expanding the for-loop body, and so it is equivalent to manually unroll the loop (see example #1). I believe the for-loop

This might be a very beginner question, but I'm looking for an example for something that I have never done. Suppose that I wanted to express actions with respect to lifted semantics of CPU instructions to an intermediate representation, BAP IL or LLVM IR. How might I go about providing a Backus Naur Form specification and then dynamically interpreting those lifted instructions by also

On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Vijay Daultani <vijay.daultani at gmail.com>wrote: > Respected Sir/Madam, > > As I was developing some part of compiler for a project. I require grammar > (BNF or EBNF) for converting the C code in the IR as it is not been > mentioned any where over your official website. > > Awaiting for your help. > > Hi Vijay, If you are asking

If you are changing the syntax, please update the BNF in the comments. --Sean Silva On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Akira Hatanaka <ahatanak at gmail.com> wrote: > The attached patch adds a construct that enables extending the base class' > lists rather than completely overwriting them. > The patch hasn't gone through extensive testing yet (other than running make >

Greetings made men of rails! I am presently writing a new database adapter for rails to bring the OpenBase community on board. In working through the rather extensive AR tests (which I very much appreciate), I have come across a question I can''t seem to answer on my own. In the test_has_many_with_piggyback(AssociationsJoinModel) the result is expected as a quoted integer

I need to write some documentation: I'm looking for a standard, consistent way of referring to the components and attributes of R data structures. Googling and Stackoverflow yield a variety of github sites that do not seem to be particularly authoritative. I was hoping to find a BNF/ABNF grammar for R. I've looked at the output of bison -v ./R-3.6.2/src/main/gram.y but it does not