similar to: Bug#587150: #587150: d-i netinst cd doesn't boot, isolinux error: further investigation

Here is a last example to illustrate my concern. The problem is about the lowering of node t13. Initial selection DAG: BB#0 '_start:entry' SelectionDAG has 44 nodes: t11: i16 = Constant<0> t0: ch = EntryToken t3: ch = llvm.clp.set.rspa t0, TargetConstant:i16<392>, Constant:i32<64> t5: ch = llvm.clp.set.rspb t3,

Hi, I am having some issues with how some of the instructions are being legalized. So this is my intial basic block. The area of concern is the last three instructions. I will pick and choose debug output to keep this small. SelectionDAG has 36 nodes: t0: ch = EntryToken t6: i32,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i32 %vreg507 t2: i32,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i32 %vreg17

The DAG dumping will try to print some of the nodes "inline" (i.e. where they are used) to make the output more readable, so the dump of the DAG may not strictly reflect the node ordering. -Krzysztof On 5/4/2018 8:18 AM, Dominique Torette via llvm-dev wrote: > Here is a last example to illustrate my concern. > > The problem is about the lowering of node t13. > >

Krzysztof, Thanks for your interest to my questions. In order to clarify the context, here is the C source file of my test case. The 3 builtins initialize some stack pointers. They have to be executed before any other instruction. extern float fdivfaddfmul_a(float a, float b, float c, float d); volatile static float x1,x2,x3,x4; void _start(void) { float res;

But isn't kinda silly that we transform to xor and then we transform it back. What is the advantage in doing so? Also, since we do that method, I now have to introduce setcc patterns for i1 values, instead of being able to just use logical pattern operators like not. -Dilan On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:00 AM Dilan Manatunga <manatunga at gmail.com> wrote: > For some reason I

Dear all, I am having a data for 2 different treatments with different time points. So, I used the following code to plot the boxplot and also to do anova. T11 <- c(280, 336, 249, 277, 429) T12 <- c(400, 397, 285, 407, 313) T13 <- c(725, 373, 364, 706, 249) T21 <- c(589, 257, 466, 248, 913) T22 <- c(519, 424, 512, 298, 907) T23 <- c(529, 479, 634, 354, 1015) obs <- c(T11,

Adding llvm-dev as that might be a more suitable audience for this discussion. (& I know Lang's been playing around with the same problem in the Orc JIT, so adding him too) Is there any basis/reason to believe that the .X suffix is a better, more principled one than straight X? Is that documented somewhere as a thing the demangling tools will ignore? On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:06 PM,

Hello. I'm having problems at instruction selection with my back end with the following basic-block due to a vector add with immediate constant vector (obtained by vectorizing a simple C program doing vector sum map): vector.ph: ; preds = %vector.memcheck50 %.splatinsert = insertelement <8 x i64> undef, i64 %i.07.unr, i32 0

On 10/20/2016 9:28 AM, Cameron McInally via llvm-dev wrote: > I should have attached the generated asm to save some trouble. > Apologies for that and attaching now... > > > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Cameron McInally > <cameron.mcinally at nyu.edu> wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote:

Here's our testcase: #include <stdio.h> struct flags { unsigned frog: 1; unsigned foo : 1; unsigned bar : 1; unsigned bat : 1; unsigned baz : 1; unsigned bam : 1; }; int main() { struct flags flags; flags.bar = 1; flags.foo = 1; if (flags.foo == 1) { printf("Pass\n"); return 0; } else {

On 12/21/2016 4:45 PM, Phil Tomson via llvm-dev wrote: > Here's our testcase: > > #include <stdio.h> > > struct flags { > unsigned frog: 1; > unsigned foo : 1; > unsigned bar : 1; > unsigned bat : 1; > unsigned baz : 1; > unsigned bam : 1; > }; > > int main() { > struct flags flags; > flags.bar = 1; >

Dear colleagues, After installing Wine 0.9.30 (...mdk from winehq) on my Mandrake 10.1/ IBM T23 laptop, I tried "wine notepad" and various other variants of the same, nothing coming out. It has been able to find most of the libraries, after a lot of ENOTTY according to 'strace' (500K of output, so I didn't attached it here), but simply stucked, stopped to search for

Hi. I was wanting to set up a centos 6 virtual machine using the netinst iso image. I've done this for Centos 5 before but I was surprised to see that the size of the netinst iso had gone from +/- 10Mb to 227Mb. I was therefore wondering if I had the right file? If so, why did it get 22x bigger then the previous version? Regards, Johan

Trying to install Debian Lenny amd64 from netinst cd on Xen HVM, the computer hangs and needs to reset physically. My computer supports HVM, I''ve a HVM Windows XP installed with no problems. Other ways to install Lenny on HVM are welcome. I tried with debootstrap, but it doesn''t boot disk image :-( My config is: import os, re arch = os.uname()[4] if

Hi, Is there a kind of scope mechanism in the instruction lowering pattern language in order to control where instructions are inserted or how they are later reordered during the SelectionDiag linearization? I know the glue chain that stick instructions together. But such mechanism in not provided in instruction lowering pattern. I'm facing many situations where some patterns are lowered into

Added linux-btrfs and Helmut Hullen, who seemed to experience hangs on a T23 with BTRFS as well, to Cc. Am Thursday 03 February 2011 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.36 and 2.6.37. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between

Note: I could simply direct boot the appropriate kernel/initrd to get the alpha1 installation going as always done in the past, but I think this should work. The Debian alpha 1 installer page says it should. Details $ sudo xm create -c wheezytest.cfg Using config file "./wheezytest.cfg". Error: Boot loader didn''t return any data! direct pygrub test run: # pygrub

Hello everyone, I have just released Syslinux 4.00-pre59. This is intended as last call for 4.00: from this point on I will only fix showstopper bugs. Anything that didn't make this release will have to wait for 4.01 or 4.10. Please help test it and report bugs, so we can avoid said showstopper bugs in the actual release. Target date for final release is Monday, June 28. -hpa

It would be nice to have something like stata's outreg that lets regression output go into a form like Specification (1) Specification (2) Var 1 coef(1,1) coef(1,2) se(1,1) se(1,2) Var 2 coef(2,1) coef(2,2) se(2,1) se(2,2) I don't think this can be done in xtable? Thomas Davidoff Assistant Professor Haas School of Business UC Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94618 Phone: (510)

ÎÒ¹«Ë¾ÏµÍâóÆóÒµ£¬ÓÐÒâÀ©´ó¾­Óª¹æÄ££¬ÏëÔÚ¹óµØÑ°ÕÒºÏ×÷»ï°é£¬Ìؽ«´Ë¼ÛÄ¿±íÌṩ¸øÄú·½²Î¿¼£¬ÎÒ¹«Ë¾±£Ö¤²úƷΪȫÐÂÔ­×°Èý¸öÔ°ü»»Ò»Äê°üÐÞÈý°ü£¬±£Ö¤ÐÅÓþ£¬»õµ½¸¶¿î £¬²»ÏêÊÂÒËÄú¿ÉÀ´ÈËÀ´µç´¹Ñ¯£¡ÈçÓдòÈÅ£¬Çë¶à°üº­£¡£¡£¡ ÁªÏµÈË£º¹ù½õºê ÁªÏµµç»°£º(0)13859713911 ¹«Ë¾£ºÌ¨Íą̊±±ºè´óÆóÒµÉÌó¹«Ë¾ Ò»¡¢µçÄÔÅä¼þ (ÈËÃñ±Ò) 1.cpu InteI p4 2G/1.8G/1.7G(Socket478) £¤ 500/420/390Ôª InteI p4 1.6G/1.5G/1.4G(Socket478) £¤