similar to: Advanced Format Technology

OK todays problem. I have a HP N54L Microserver running centos 6.5. In this box I have a 3x2TB disk raid 5 array, which I am in the process of extending to a 4x2TB raid 5 array. I've added the new disk --> mdadm --add /dev/md0 /dev/sdb And grown the array --> mdadm --grow /dev/md0 --raid-devices=4 Now the problem the resync speed is v slow, it refuses to rise above 5MB, in general

On 8/5/2015 1:00 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey at buc.com> wrote: >> How would I go about pointing it at the partition? >> >> What I am currently doing is this: >> device (hd0) /dev/hdg >> root (hd0,0) >> setup (hd0) > > setup (hd1,0) > > It's hd1 if your device map is correct and

I see a really good price, and better for quantity, for 3TB drives. Now, I've been down on WD for a couple of years, since I found that they'd protected certain h/d parms from being changed (like TLER). The ones I'm looking at are the Red, which seems to be a new color (at least to me), and one technical review I've read says that they're intended for NAS, etc, and you can

On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey at buc.com> wrote: > On 8/5/2015 1:00 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey at buc.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> How would I go about pointing it at the partition? >>> >>> What I am currently doing is this: >>> device

> I'm having an issue getting a C6.6 install to work on a 3 TB dual hard >drive system, raid 0. I'm hoping that someone here can help. 1: Is this system booting UEFI or BIOS? 2: Is the disk partitioned with MBR or GPT? 3: Is /boot on its own partition? 3TB drives are larger than MBR and BIOS properly support, so they're only really expected to work on a system partitioned with

According to various posts the LSI SAS3081E-R seems to work well with OpenSolaris. But I''ve got pretty chilled-out from my recent problems with Areca-1680''s. Could anyone please confirm that the LSI SAS3081E-R works well ? Is hotplug supported ? Anything else I should know before buying one of these cards ? Thanks, Arnaud

Samba Version 4.12.1 I'm trying to change server IP address from 10.0.0.69 to .3 on a single AD DC running also as fileserver (very small situation). I'm following this [1] guide, I have no interface restrictions in samba or in bind. I stop samba, change IP address, restart bind, start samba, but when I run samba_dnsupdate I get some messages until: 5 DNS updates and 5 DNS deletes

----- Mensagem original ----- De: "Rowland Penny" <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> Para: samba at lists.samba.org Enviadas: Terça-feira, 1 de Setembro de 2015 12:05:20 Assunto: Re: [Samba] Samba AD - Issue with winbindd: Could not write result On 01/09/15 15:33, Rafael Domiciano wrote: > Hi Rowland, thanks for your response. > > Both samba is self compiled. >

Hi Rowland, thanks for your response. Both samba is self compiled . DC 1: [root at wdc samba]# uname -a Linux wdc 2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jun 9 20:57:37 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [root at wdc samba]# cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 6.6 (Final) [root at wdc samba]# cat /etc/resolv.conf search DOMAIN nameserver 172.16.5.22 nameserver 172.16.5.1

On 02/09/15 13:34, Rafael Domiciano wrote: > The same problem ocurred today. The same log in /var/log/messages in > DC, and I have to stop and start the samba service. Any help is > appreciate. > > Regards, > > Rafael > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *De: *"Rafael Domiciano" <r.domiciano at

On 22/05/2020 06:38, Lorenzo Milesi via samba wrote: >> Verify dig -x $(hostname -i) >> Then dig A $(hostname -f) >> >> As long as these match any CNAME should work. > These works, but why these should match a CNAME? hostname returns the "main" host... > > Anyway to make a test I configured a new CNAME > > #?dig server.wdc.mydomain.it > ;; ANSWER

On 14/04/2023 12:13, Lorenzo Milesi via samba wrote: > >> That all smells quite similar to what I were seeing >> here before, and what someone else were seeing too, >> all with 4.17[.4]. This famouse WERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND >> error too. > > We upgraded one more domain, and in the hope to avoid this error, we remained on 4.16. So we deployed a new 4.16.9 DC, joined,

I have Windows 7 on /dev/sda and CentOS 6.4 on /dev/sdb. Here are the layouts: (parted) select /dev/sda Using /dev/sda (parted) print Model: ATA WDC WD10EZEX-00Z (scsi) Disk /dev/sda: 1000GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B Partition Table: msdos Number Start End Size Type File system Flags 1 1049kB 374MB 373MB primary ntfs boot

Had to replace dying cpu and mobo, so also replaced IDE with new SATA drive. Installed from latest ISO onto SATA and can't get networking to lease an IP address from my ISP (Comcast). The network utility always comes up with a private address (192.168.0.2) instead of Comcast IP. To add to confusion, if I boot into old IDE drive, I get proper network connection to internet, but lose my

I just happened to notice this morning in /var/log/messages: chronyd[1299]: Selected source 207.244.103.95 host 207.244.103.95 95.103.244.207.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer dns-e.wdc-us.hosts.301-moved.de. Just curious why my machine in Indiana (USA) is asking for time in Germany. Wouldn't it use something closer ? Thanks, jerry

I've just deployed an AD DC fileserver with Samba4 but the server itself is not available when browsing network computers from a Windows PC. Is it because of this [1][2] or did I misconfigure it? Thanks my config: # Global parameters [global] netbios name = FILESERVER realm = WDC.MYDOMAIN.IT server role = active directory domain controller server services =

I read Ben Rockwood''s blog post about Thumpers and SMART (http://cuddletech.com/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=993). Will the SUNWhd package only work on a Thumper? Can I use this on my snv_101 system with AMD 64 bit processor and nVidia SATA?

Hello all. I have a supermicro 16 bay box with a LSI 9211-8i card. We use it for temp data storage, and we wanted to try the l4z compression. After updating the source tree to r247839: and doing a make buildworld cycle all works fine. But at boot time we get some warnings. make_dev_physpath_alias: WARNING - Unable to alias gptid/281951f4-a996-11e1-83eb-00259061b51a to enc at

I'm having a weird situation with a freshly installed Samba v4.12.1 compiled from source. This is a single server with DC and fileserver, I followed all the guidelines for doing things correctly in this specific situation and I hope I haven't missed anything. The server works correctly as expected, I'm managing all the permissions from Windows. Unfortunately users occasionally

On 01/13/2015 12:47 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> I'm having an issue getting a C6.6 install to work on a 3 TB dual hard >> drive system, raid 0. I'm hoping that someone here can help. > 1: Is this system booting UEFI or BIOS? > 2: Is the disk partitioned with MBR or GPT? > 3: Is /boot on its own partition? > > 3TB drives are larger than MBR and BIOS properly