similar to: Did anybody see (s)RPM for Xgl?

Hi I have a degraded array /dev/md2 ===================================================================== $ mdadm -D /dev/md2 /dev/md2: Version : 00.90.01 Creation Time : Thu Oct 6 20:31:57 2005 Raid Level : raid5 Array Size : 221953536 (211.67 GiB 227.28 GB) Device Size : 110976768 (105.84 GiB 113.64 GB) Raid Devices : 3 Total Devices : 2 Preferred Minor : 2

Hello How do I switch off color mode on console (we have just BW monitor at the server) and not for all terminal connections? -- Petr Kl?ma e-mail: qaxi at seznam.cz

hi i can not find any info on RH ... -- Petr Kl?ma e-mail: qaxi at seznam.cz

-------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: "Petr \"Qaxi\" Klima" <qaxi at seznam.cz> Subject: Re: [Centos] Release of centos-3.3 ISP bill Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 07:56:24 +0200 Size: 2686 URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20041027/6185ecd0/attachment-0003.mht>

Hi Are there any CentOS news groups with the same content as this mailing list? Petr Kl?ma e-mail: qaxi at seznam.cz

hi I have problem with mod_authz_ldap with this setup: <Directory /var/www/html/weby_2005> AuthzLDAPServer "ldap:389" AuthzLDAPUserBase dc=group,dc=cz AuthzLDAPBindDN uid=ds,ou=People,dc=group,dc=cz AuthzLDAPBindPassword XXXXX AuthzLDAPUserKey uid AuthzLDAPUserScope subtree AuthzLDAPLogLevel debug # needed for user auth

Hello I experience performance problem with CentOs 4.4 Samba 3.0 Reading files from Samba (1 client WinXP) is 3 times slower than writing to samba. What should I look at? OS je CentOS 4.4 (RHEL 4 U4) # smbd --version Version 3.0.10-1.4E.11 CFG ================================================================== # cat /etc/samba/smb.conf [global] workgroup = GROUP netbios name = SERVER server

Hi Are scripts in http://mirror.centos.org/centos/build/ enough to build complete distro? Is there an document describing the process? (I have spare HP PA-RISC server, I want to play ... ;-) ) -- Petr Kl?ma e-mail: qaxi at seznam.cz

Hi, As there has been some confusion over Xgl and Xorg here, I thought I'd just post this. XGL acts as a client to the Xserver and acts as a server for all programs connecting to itself. Instead of displaying its results on a monitor, it interprets the display and calls the appropriate OpenGL APIs; the OpenGL driver physically interacts with the screen, keyboard and mouse. So you do need

Hello. I know this is off topic but sorry I cannot google out where xgl people discuss things (don't find an xgl mailing list) nor documents about this. Currently xgl supports modern ATI/Nvidia cards, is there any reason why older cards are not supported? Is it because old cards are not powerful enough, or is it because xgl is using some new 3D technologies? (OpenGL 2.0?) How about cards

Looking deeper to compiz/xgl I found three problems in my system that I report to you hoping to be somehow a little useful. I didn't find any of them using Xorg 7 First my testing environment: KDE 3.5 latest XGL cvs - XORG-7.0 Nvidia FX5200 64Mb Latest nvidia drivers Kernel 2.6.16.1 XGL problems: 1) xine is somehow broken with xgl, even with no composite managers: it is very slow even when

Hi again. I've got a laptop with an ATI X600 inside, perfectly working xorg with dual head configuration, 2 desktops (without xinerama). I've got 2 xorg.conf files, one for propietary ATI (fglrx) driver, and other to use the open source driver. The difference is very notorious. The problem I have is that I read (Saint Google) that to work with compiz/beryl and dual-head configuration, I

I have a Dell Inspiron with the ATI x1400 video card. In Ubuntu 7.04 I ran Compiz-Fusion in XGL with the fglrx drivers and the system was very responsive. I noticed no performance penalties at all. In Ubuntu 8.04 I am running Compiz natively with the current fglrx drivers, and the system is sluggish. Disabling Compiz makes the system very responsive. So I am interested in running Compiz in XGL

I know this list is meant for discussion of compiz specifically, but .... 1) I sometimes see compiz spit out "Could not bind pixmap to texture" messages, even though it _appears_ to be working fine. I randomly guess that this is due to me running out of video memory (iirc I have 64mb of vram). Is that possibly a problem? I think Vista and OS X manually manage video

wine version: 1.0-rc4 - Installing Sketchup works fine with some minor issues. - Running Sketchup will result in the following error message: "Sketchup was unable to initialize OpenGL! Please make sure you have installed the correct drivers for your graphics card. Error: ChoosePixelFormat failed", and after that the application closes down. As mentioned in several of the test

Hi all, have anybody already heard about Xgl? Do you know if there are rpm's for it? thx Nick -- Nicholas Anderson Administrador de Sistemas Unix LPIC-1 Certified Rede Fiocruz

Latest amd/ati drivers (8.37|8.38) supports composite with dri. So, after patching beryl (cause he can work without tfp) to make it use direct rendering on "aiglx method" and removed check for GLX_SGIX_fbconfig, which fails. - I was able to run beryl on fglrx WITHOUT Xgl. Only bug with windows drawing exists(as noticed in latest known issues for ati drives), more about this bug -

Hello Did anybody get any result for search in "Red Hat Hardware Catalog" http://bugzilla.redhat.com/hwcert/list.cgi?product=Red%20Hat%20Hardware%20Certification&quicksearch=3com&order=bugs.internal_whiteboard,bugs.bug_status%2Cbugs.priority%2Cmap_assigned_to.login_name%2Cbugs.bug_id&offset= On question for "3Com" I get only answer "15 certifications

Hi does anybody use %SUBJ in Centos 4.0 ? -- Petr Kl?ma e-mail: qaxi at seznam.cz

Hello, I'm new to the list but I've been following it since its inception. First of all sorry for the length of this post, if you're not a Fedora user just skip it. I've been building Compiz packages since Fedora Core 5 came out (Xgl only) and updating since then with all the new stuff, AIGLX and whatever. I use them on a very large range of hardware. Attached are my source rpm