Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "online updates"
2016 Aug 23
1
AD DC on virtual machine
On 2016-08-23 13:10, Reindl Harald via samba wrote:
>
> Am 23.08.2016 um 11:43 schrieb Sylvain Nex via samba:
>> In my last job, I could see the disasters of restoring virtual machine
>> with
>> Microsoft AD as a standalone domain controller (a day reinstalling the
>> domain controller).
>>
>> What are the recommendations on virtualizing Samba AD DC
2016 Aug 23
2
AD DC on virtual machine
Hi,
In my last job, I could see the disasters of restoring virtual machine with
Microsoft AD as a standalone domain controller (a day reinstalling the
domain controller).
What are the recommendations on virtualizing Samba AD DC according to samba
team ? I found nothing on the wiki about it.
Is that the best solution is to have a physical secondary controller ?
Thanks.
Sylvain
2008 Dec 26
3
Guild wars, running in the backround.
Hi, i have a problem with Guild wars, it runs only in the backround.
I ran it through terminal and got this:
Code:
fixme:win:EnumDisplayDevicesW ((null),0,0x32eb54,0x00000000), stub!
fixme:win:EnumDisplayDevicesW ((null),0,0x32e6c0,0x00000000), stub!
fixme:devenum:DEVENUM_ICreateDevEnum_CreateClassEnumerator Category {cc7bfb41-f175-11d1-a392-00e0291f3959} not found
2002 Sep 17
2
PXElinux Modification Question
Hi,
We are new to PXElinux and we are using it in our test lab
to do provisioning. When the systems come up there is a
PXElinux menu to boot local(default) or boot to the imaging
environment (linux). It works great, but we have to visit
each machine whenever we want to create or restore a disk
image.
Now we would like to be able to remotely force a system to
re-image itself. The
2016 Oct 07
4
Alternating boot default entry every reboot
Hi,
I am currently using isolinux (syslinux-6.03) in a clonezilla setup. It
boots fine, however I want to have a setup where the default boot selection
alternates every boot.
* First boot : Default is menu item 0
* Second boot : Default is menu item 1
* Third boot : Default is menu item 0
...
The idea is that when it is booted into clonezilla the clonezilla script
checks if the system needs to
2007 May 31
3
moh backround?
Hello.
Is it possible to "mix" musiconhold music and playback voices? What i want to
do is something like this: A person calls a number, gets a playback voice
while in background music is playing. The configuration i use at the moment
don't do what i want. Someone knows how to do it? Thanks in advance.
exten => 18,1,Answer
exten => 18,n,Background()
exten =>
2002 Nov 07
2
RE: standby mode
I think you answered your own question. Samba (smbd) is a service. It is
doing its job and ready to offer service at any time. Apparently this
involves periodically accessing the disk. There is nothing wrong with this;
it is normal operation. Samba won't work anyway when you are in standby, so
you might as well stop it when you are done using it.
PG
> -----Original Message-----
>
2018 May 07
5
[PATCH] qemu: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature bit to virtio_net
This feature bit can be used by hypervisor to indicate virtio_net device to
act as a standby for another device with the same MAC address.
I tested this with a small change to the patch to mark the STANDBY feature 'true'
by default as i am using libvirt to start the VMs.
Is there a way to pass the newly added feature bit 'standby' to qemu via libvirt
XML file?
Signed-off-by:
2018 May 07
5
[PATCH] qemu: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature bit to virtio_net
This feature bit can be used by hypervisor to indicate virtio_net device to
act as a standby for another device with the same MAC address.
I tested this with a small change to the patch to mark the STANDBY feature 'true'
by default as i am using libvirt to start the VMs.
Is there a way to pass the newly added feature bit 'standby' to qemu via libvirt
XML file?
Signed-off-by:
2008 Feb 17
2
Anyone have an idea how to find file i/o throughput?
We got a remote Oracle 10g R2 standby running on OCFS2. Initial when we
started the standby, read I/O was < 5MB/sec on average. Since then it
has grown to over 40MB/sec (longer average, it peaks much higher). Here
is a graph showing this:
http://www.alameda.net/~ulf/dbphx01.png
We also have a local standby running (on EXT3) which is not showing the
same symptom. I am trying to find where all
2002 Dec 31
1
any way to use binary kernel modules + pxe booting?
So, I'm trying to boot using PXE + NFS root filesystem, to boot a kernel
that can reimage machines. This has been quite successful for me, until
just recently where I ran into a motherboard that had a broadcom
ethernet chipset - the broadcom driver is binary only. I can boot a
kernel using PXE and load the broadcom driver using a custom initrd, but
don't know how to then NFS mount the root
2018 Jun 05
6
[PATCH] qemu: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature bit to virtio_net
I don't think this is sufficient.
If both primary and standby devices are present, a legacy guest without
support for the feature might see two devices with same mac and get
confused.
I think that we should only make primary visible after guest acked the
backup feature bit.
And on reset or when backup is cleared in some other way, unplug the
primary.
Something like the below will do the
2018 Jun 05
6
[PATCH] qemu: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature bit to virtio_net
I don't think this is sufficient.
If both primary and standby devices are present, a legacy guest without
support for the feature might see two devices with same mac and get
confused.
I think that we should only make primary visible after guest acked the
backup feature bit.
And on reset or when backup is cleared in some other way, unplug the
primary.
Something like the below will do the
2018 Jun 05
3
[PATCH] qemu: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature bit to virtio_net
On 2018?06?05? 09:41, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
> Ping on this patch now that the kernel patches are accepted into
> davem's net-next tree.
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/920005/
>
>
> On 5/7/2018 4:09 PM, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
>> This feature bit can be used by hypervisor to indicate virtio_net
>> device to
>> act as a standby for another device
2018 Jun 05
3
[PATCH] qemu: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature bit to virtio_net
On 2018?06?05? 09:41, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
> Ping on this patch now that the kernel patches are accepted into
> davem's net-next tree.
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/920005/
>
>
> On 5/7/2018 4:09 PM, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
>> This feature bit can be used by hypervisor to indicate virtio_net
>> device to
>> act as a standby for another device
2018 Jun 12
2
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature bit to virtio_net
On 2018?06?12? 01:26, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:09:54PM -0700, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
>> This feature bit can be used by hypervisor to indicate virtio_net device to
>> act as a standby for another device with the same MAC address.
>>
>> I tested this with a small change to the patch to mark the STANDBY feature 'true'
>> by
2018 Jun 12
2
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature bit to virtio_net
On 2018?06?12? 01:26, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:09:54PM -0700, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
>> This feature bit can be used by hypervisor to indicate virtio_net device to
>> act as a standby for another device with the same MAC address.
>>
>> I tested this with a small change to the patch to mark the STANDBY feature 'true'
>> by
2012 Feb 24
3
Replicating SIP registration Info between active to standby
I have a scenario whereby two servers are acting in active-standby mode.
In case the active server fail, the shared IP is activated on standby
server for continuity.
However, SIP phones (all are Polycom) takes quite a long time to register
to the Standby Server (up to 1-10min). While Polycom allow double
registration, we would like to make it simple by provision only one
registration server at a
2018 Jun 22
2
[virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH] qemu: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature bit to virtio_net
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 12:43:26PM -0700, Siwei Liu wrote:
> > The semantics are that the primary is always used if present in
> > preference to standby.
> OK. If this is the only semantics of what "standby" refers to in
> general, that is fine.
>
> I just don't want to limit the failover/standby semantics to the
> device model specifics, the
2013 Dec 19
0
[LLVMdev] an OS around LLVM
You might wish to read this thread as well, for some backround on LLVM IR.
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2011-October/043719.html
Summary:
LLVM IR is target specific, not portable between different targets.
LLVM IR is actually a Compiler IR and not a virtual machine language.