similar to: mail access list

I've noticed from the sendmail logs, certain IP's are being blocked via the known spammers configuration in the sendmail.cf. What I also note is in my access file, I have several TLD's that are listed, yet are NOT being blocked. Yes, I do call a make after each edit of the access list, and going by the timestamp on access.db, it appears to being updated, yet again, in the sendmail

Hi all, I've been trying to hit on the right configuration combo to allow relaying from specific users and/or domains to an internal box running Sendmail. Reading the docs at http://www.sendmail.org/m4/anti_spam.html#relay and http://www.sendmail.org/m4/anti_spam.html#access_db_fine I would appear that I should be able to all per-address relaying in /etc/mail/access by enabling

When I set up the Evolution mail agent, I could find no way to change the outbound port from 25 to 587. I have to do this due to port 25 being blocked by the cable company. Thunderbird is no problem. Altho I don't particularly use Evolution as a mail agent, there are times when I might use it, but its worthless without being able to send mail out to my server. Did I miss something in

A while back, I posted a note asking if anyone had any ideas why the /etc/mail/access file was not being parsed or utilized in the efforts to stop spam and junk mail. I just looked over things again, and have still not found any reason why it still permits the TLD's I have listed to pass thru. I also thought perhaps there might be some "upper limit" to the number of entries

Does anyone know if the folks at Sun have put out a jre version to work with the x86_64 version of CentOS? If not, is there even any possibility of it occuring? Thanks.. Sam -- Snowman

Does anyone have any experience with Super-Micro brand motherboards // dual Xeon cpu's? Had to swap out my Tyan piece of junk and going back with the S-M board. I believe it has similar north/southbridge chips on it -- at least they are the intel MCH ICH5R and PXH plus the 82546GB. One area that the Tyan board was seriously lacking in was in the hardware monitoring department. The S-M

I am looking for a way for sendmail to ALLOW auth by IP and not user name (its a closed network) or even SKIP invalid auth ? Is that even possible ? Jerry

Fellow users, I'm running into some rather odd behavior trying to compile some software, and would like to know if there is maybe a fix or if I should revert back to a 32-bit version of Centos. I'm trying to compile NCAR Graphics, as well as some other weather related software on this machine which is running the Centos 4.1 x86-64 version. It's a dual Xeon processor.

Don't know if this might be hardware or software related, but it seems that every time I attempt to do a remote reboot of the machine, everything shuts down normally, and it never comes back. Just returned from the co-lo site, and when I plugged the monitor in, it had gone to the point of "rebooting" and hung. This is 4.3 on x-86. Sam -- Sam W.Drinkard -- sam at wa4phy.net

At ~07:40 (UTC-4:00) this morning our gateway host lost its WAN Ethernet adaptor. Subsequent to recovery, which required a reboot, the following entries were find in /var/log/messages: Jun 6 07:39:50 gway02 kernel: PING_FLOOD: IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:25:90:61:74:c0:00 :24:14:2b:f2:80:08:00 SRC=74.205.112.125 DST=216.185.71.33 LEN=64 TOS=0x00 PREC= 0x00 TTL=50 ID=30954 PROTO=ICMP TYPE=8 CODE=0

Hi again, I've got a nagging irritant with either putty or the man pages, or perhaps my setup. If I use putty to log into my server and request any man page, it returns the page, but really important stuff like keywords are blank. Is this perhaps caused by the wrong terminal setting in putty or is there something with Centos man pages that cause this to happen? Thanks again, Sam

Rats... found some hardware monitoring from the vendor and it's broken, or I'm missing some pieces. No mention of CentOS specifically, but RH is supported, so figured it *ought* to work. I'm apparently missing a library -- liblinc.so.1, and a net search reveals several sources, both for x86 and 64-bit. Tried them both, after the x86 did not work, and the 64-bit I thought was

> -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Evans > Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 12:50 PM > > On 4/19/20 12:38 PM, S.Bob wrote: > > > > On 4/19/20 10:36 AM, Tim Evans wrote: > >> On 4/19/20 12:28 PM, S.Bob wrote: > >>> All; > >>> > >>> > >>> I installed sendmail via yum, but if I test it like this: > >>>

I know this is more of a general unix question, but the thread about the last kernel update, and memory usage got me to looking and thinking. Given a system with 2 Gb of memory, and at peak usage, top reports considerably less than the 2 gig amount in use, as well as system monitoring that never shows all available memory used, what would happen if you just turned swap off, and let memory

> -----Original Message----- > From: S.Bob > Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 2:26 PM > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] [Off topic] sending mail from Comcast was: Sendmail not working > > I followed this guide: > > > https://pepipost.com/tutorials/install-sendmail-server-centos-7/ Sigh - bad examples for you.... undo if you can. Postfix provides the

Over the past year or so, I've collected several errors that some I have found the solution for, others, like the one below are quite befuddling. I get this one every week when /etc/cron.weekly runs. What the heck is the "S" or what it is looking for? Also, I've checked with cpan, and according to cpan, it says it doesn't know what NET::DNS is, yet if I do an i

I've apparently made a mess of clamav. Tried uninstalling it, and excluded it from dag's repo. Now, when I yum install clamav and clamav-server, I'm apparently missing all the libs, data and so forth. Can someone tell me what I need to do to get this back ? I probably blew all the old stuff away during the update or later, and don't have a clue as to why it's not doing

Ok.. I'm way behind the 8-ball on setting things up correctly, but after going over the protection things in yum, I ran a yum check-update and it returned with having 318 files excluded because of protection. Is that too high a number? I have the numerical protection set to 1. Is there a good tutorial about how to correctly set up the protect base. Sorry if this is a noobie question..

Folks, I am totally ignorant about xen, and while I've been doing a little reading, I've not yet figured out if xen is running under CentOS or if CentOS is running under xen on this 5.2 version of CentOS. I do know that the whole system from the user standpoint is way slower than it was under 4.7. Heck, I can't even find much on what to do with xen, much less figure out how to

List, After I think the last or next to last update to firefox, I started seeing some problems, wherein I no longer have a "back" function on any pages or tabs. Also, I get some kind of strange message.... "Assertion Failed ASSERT:***Search:_installLocation: engine has no file! Stack Trace: 0 ENSURE_WARN(false,_installLocation: engine has no file!.2147500037)