similar to: Passing option-209 to PXE client w/ ISC DHCPD V2

A long time, this apeared on the list: > Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 08:17:26 -0700 > From: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> > To: Gal Goldschmidt <gal at cs.haifa.ac.il> > Cc: syslinux at zytor.com > Subject: Re: [syslinux] ISC DHCPD Problem and Solution. > > Gal Goldschmidt wrote: > > > > All the station in that group suddenly did not receive the net

Dear gentlemen, here goes the documentation fix I was talking about :-) The Wiki page on PXElinux, specifically the chapter on UEFI at the end of that page: https://wiki.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php?title=PXELINUX#UEFI ...contains a few examples of ISC DHCPd configuration. The stumbling block for me was the syntax of these "if" scopes: if option architecture-type = 9 { filename

Hello all, I have set up a samba4 server with bind9 and the bind_dlz module. Everything is working as it should but now I need to allow the dhcp server to add entries to the forwarding zone. Has anybody implemented such a configuration ? Can this be done with the kerberos DNS dynamic update configuration. I want to achieve the following: 1) allow non-Windows machines (printers, ILO ...) to be

Hi, I already solved this problem, I offer this a part of the FAQ or as a starting point for an FAQ addition I was using the RH pxe support, but I got tired of pressing F8. I wanted to make a few machines to auto boot without any intervetion, well that's what dhcp/bootp/pxe is all about right? I followed the HOWTO on the pxelinux site. I desperately upgraded to the latest ISC 3.1p9. The

On 8 Nov 2019 at 0:42, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: > [in response to my = Frank Rysanek's rantings a few hours earlier:] > > if option architecture-type = 00:09 { > > filename "path/to/EFIx64/syslinux.efi"; > > } ... > > if substring (option vendor-class-identifier, 15, 5) = "00007" { > > filename

Hello, I try to set up a AD with bind9 and isc-dhcp-Server for dynamic DNS-updates. I followd the wiki: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_DHCP_to_update_DNS_records_wi th_BIND9 But I have this error: Oct 7 12:17:36 samba467 dhcpd: execute_statement argv[0] = /etc/dhcp/bin/dhcp-dyndns.sh Oct 7 12:17:36 samba467 dhcpd: execute_statement argv[1] = add Oct 7 12:17:36 samba467 dhcpd:

Everyone, I am trying to set up a second internal network (192.168.0.0/24) and have not been able to get dhcp to start when I have the following in my dhcpd.conf file : subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { range 192.168.0.110 192.168.0.130; option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0; option broadcast-address 192.168.0.255; option routers 192.168.0.1; option

Everyone, I am trying to set up a second internal network (192.168.0.0/24) and have not been able to get dhcp to start when I have the following in my dhcpd.conf file : subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { range 192.168.0.110 192.168.0.130; option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0; option broadcast-address 192.168.0.255; option routers 192.168.0.1; option

Has anyone had good luck serving dhcp addresses to Vista clients that work reliably? I have a test system and I can't seem to find out how to properly get dhcpd to always respond with broadcast instead of unicast since Vista won't honor unicast dhcp packets. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!! --------------

Hello Rolawnd, I followed the wikipage exactly. Bind9 is installed on the Samba DC. The Linux-Client should be a member of the Active Directory-domain? Regards ----- Mensaje original ----- De: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Para: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Enviados: Sábado, 7 de Octubre 2017 13:29:43 Asunto: Re: [Samba] bind9 and isc-dhcp-Server for

Anybody have any experience with setting up dhcpd in failover mode between two servers? I set this up on a couple of servers, and it seems to be working, but I don't think it is working "right". It appears both servers are replying to all requests (which for renewals works okay because they both give the same address, but new requests get two different responses). I thought that

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.28 Severity: normal Hi, the Internet Software Consortium changed the name to Internet Systems Consortium. For a fix for the logcheck rules see the attachment. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel:

El 24/06/15 a les 17:02, James ha escrit: > On 6/24/2015 10:13 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 24/06/15 14:17, Luca Olivetti wrote: >>> El 24/06/15 a les 14:30, James ha escrit: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Is it possible to use isc-dhcp for DDNS with Samba internal DNS? I >>>> would rather not use bind as I understand you can't

I've installed CentOS-6 on my server (in parallel to CentOS-5.6) and now I'm trying to set up dhcpd. I'm not sure if there has been a change in dhcpd under CentOS-6, but I'm getting the dreaded message "Not configured to listen on any interfaces!" when I "sudo service dhcpd restart". I realise now that I have never known how the connection between interface

I have 2 groups of machines, and within each group the pxelinux menu configuration is standard. It would be great to have 2 configuration files rather than one for each machine. I found the pxelinux magic option configfile (209) in http://syslinux.zytor.com/wiki/index.php/PXELINUX and it suggests for ISC dhcpd: site-option-space "pxelinux"; option pxelinux.magic

Hi Rowland, I have not another dhcp server. dnsmasq is not configured. I think the problem may be permissions. Which distribution linux do you use, Ubuntu? I was tracing the script code dhcp-dyndns.sh, when the execution on the first line fails Is correct this instructions in Debian: chown root:root /etc/dhcp/dhcpduser.keytab chmod 400 /etc/dhcp/dhcpduser.keytab ----- Mensaje original

> Dear gentlemen, > > here goes the documentation fix I was talking about :-) > > The Wiki page on PXElinux, specifically the chapter on UEFI at the end > of that page: > https://wiki.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php?title=PXELINUX#UEFI > ...contains a few examples of ISC DHCPd configuration. > > The stumbling block for me was the syntax of these "if"

>/> This allows us to bind the UUID to IP, and then pxelinux branches based />/> on the IP... />/> /> > You can also tell dhcpd to generate an option 209 from the UUID, if you > prefer. It is doable from dhcpd.conf, however when adding a node, one must do: * add uuid entry to dhcpd.conf * restart dhcp It is not always desirable (or convinient) when managing

This might be a bit offtopic, but: How to run bind and dhcpd as slave on windows 2008 ad domain. Is it possible? -- Eero, RHCE

On 06/06/2013 02:00 AM, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi > <vmlinuz386 at yahoo.com.ar> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> First, this setup works fine without any error in syslinux 4.06 as show >> below. >> >> For convenience, both versions of syslinux 4.06 [#1] and 5.10 [#2] >> directories (~2MB each) are uploaded