similar to: Does syslinux support IBM's Power (e.g., powerpc, Power 5, Power 6) CPU?

On Jul 16, 2009, at 9:49 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: >> For us to keep IA64 around (and for it to be minimally useful for >> your >> work!), I think that the backend should pass most of the simple >> programs in MultiSource/Benchmarks for example. It does *not* need >> to >> produce amazingly fast code, but the code needs to work. I don't >>

Hi Guys, I hope this is the correct mailing list for this question. I have a dual 1.6 Ghz Itanium with 4 Gb of memory. Yes, a lot of power for Asterisk. I am running SuSE Enterprise Server with the 2.6.5-7.97-default kernel. I have just started to look into Asterisk and I am in the building stage. Now building something on Itanium is almost always a bit of a challange. This is unfortunately

Hi, > I am the maintainer of archiso (live-iso creator for Arch Linux). Thank you, too, for flying xorriso. :) > So I have two ISO images with same contents, same versions, same version > of program to generate it, but one works and other does not work!. So the size of the boot image alone cannot be the problem. > < 2013.11.23 = BAD > > 2013.11.24 = OK > <

> On Feb 2, 2015, at 6:04 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > I actually like the unified intrinsic approach here. The backend already has to know things about the personality function. Until recently we would assume that the personality function wants an Itanium LSDA, for example, and dump that out into a target-specific section. Now on Windows we look at the personality

On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Helmut Hullen <Hullen at t-online.de> wrote: > I don't have the ia64 files which are needed for a complete binary. But > maybe that's only my special problem. IA64 is Itanium. I'd guess you mean x64/x86-64. I think it may also go under the label "IA32-64". -- -Gene

On Jul 16, 2009, at 5:51 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Jul 16, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > >> >> BTW: I don't run Linux at all, so no Linux/ia64 support. >> I can see how that could be a problem for people. >> >> Anyway: my case is a weak one and I would understand if the >> target get axed without considering my email/request...

Red Hat is pleased to announce the availability of Update 2 for the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 family of products, including: - Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS 4 for x86, AMD64/EM64T, Itanium, POWER, S/390 and zSeries - Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES 4 for x86, AMD64/EM64T, Itanium - Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS 4 for x86, AMD64/EM64T, Itanium - Red Hat Desktop 4 for x86 and AMD64/EM64T Craig

Hello, I'd like to introduce myself, my company, and our upcoming use of LLVM. My name is John Reagan. I've been working on compilers and assemblers since 1983 (yes, 31 years). Most of that time was spent on compilers for VAX/VMS (later renamed to OpenVMS), then OpenVMS on Alpha, and OpenVMS on Itanium. I've also worked with the HP NonStop platform and was directly involved

Hi Talin, > 1) I'm trying to figure out the relationship between the __cxa_throw > function, and the _Unwind_RaiseException function mentioned in the ABI doc. > My guess is that _Unwind_RaiseException is the language-neutral > implementation of stack unwinding, and __cxa_throw is the C++ exception > semantics that are implemented on top of it. If that is the case, should I >

Hello, I'm using Mono with experimental LLVM backend support on PowerPC. I noticed that although LLVM's IR contains SIMD instructions the assembly produced doesn't contain any Altivec instructions and my PowerPC970 machine of course has Altivec support. Isn't there some kind of autodetection? I searched in Target sources but only found out that Altivec is disabled by default. Can

On Jul 16, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > BTW: I don't run Linux at all, so no Linux/ia64 support. > I can see how that could be a problem for people. > > Anyway: my case is a weak one and I would understand if the > target get axed without considering my email/request... Hi Marcel, There are two levels of problems with the IA64 backend. On the first

Hi all, I happened to be reviewing a Linux web site that I frequent (http://www.pclinuxonline.com/index.php) and noted today an entry for an article on R at IBM's developerWorks Server Clinic site located at http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-sc16.html. I thought that I would pass this on as an FYI. Regards, Marc Schwartz

Can you point out to me where in the VMKit code I should be looking? I spent some additional time reading the docs, and I have some specific questions: 1) I'm trying to figure out the relationship between the __cxa_throw function, and the _Unwind_RaiseException function mentioned in the ABI doc. My guess is that _Unwind_RaiseException is the language-neutral implementation of stack unwinding,

Hello, I'm using Mono with experimental LLVM backend support on PowerPC. I noticed that although LLVM's IR contains SIMD instructions the assembly produced doesn't contain any Altivec instructions and my PowerPC970 machine of course has Altivec support. Isn't there some kind of autodetection? I searched in Target sources but only found out that Altivec is disabled by default. Can

I am trying to compile R-1.6.1 on an itanium. using either gcc 2.96 or gcc 3.0.4 nad either the supplied Redhat blas libs or the supplied code (ie wiht the --no-blas option) I get this error. Has anyone who has compiled R for the itanium advise me on the compilers versions and flags that they used? thanks bye rob gcc -shared -L/usr/local/lib -o lapack.so Lapack.lo

We are trying out lld ELF on windows. It works great, but a big difference from running it on linux is that it cannot demangle c++ names since there is no itanium demangler available on windows. We have an implementation in libcxxabi/src/cxa_demangle.cpp. I see that there was some discussion about having a version of that in lib/Support, but I don't think a patch was ever posted. So, some

Your PxeLinux is really a good product and contains really good features (i.e memdisk). But PxeLinux is a very low level program, contains assembly code and seems to no be portable to Itanium architectures. Does a version of PxeLinux planned for Itanium architecture ? PS:On my configuration, option pxelinux.reboottime (code 211) you give in your documentation removes my "default router"

> > > "While the processor may spin and attempt the atomic operation more than > > > once before it is successful, research indicates this is extremely > > > uncommon." I don't understand this sentence, what do you mean? > > > > I'm not sure I can pinpoint the paper from which the statement is based, > > but I seem to recall something

Moving this month old RFC to llvmdev. Not sure why I sent this to cfe-dev in the first place... --- Based on code review discussion from John, he thinks filter expressions should be emitted into the body of the function with the try, rather than being outlined by the frontend. Instead of having the frontend create filter functions, we would use labels in place of typeinfo. The IR would look

While update 3 was released last week, it looks like there are 40 or so packages updated. I dunno about squid, it is listed on http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel4as-errata.html but the changelog is from October 2005 (unless it is an rhel only bug). audit-1.0.12-1.EL4.i386.rpm audit-libs-1.0.12-1.EL4.i386.rpm audit-libs-devel-1.0.12-1.EL4.i386.rpm bootparamd-0.17-21.RHEL4.i386.rpm