similar to: Extremely broken BIOS detected

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Extremely broken BIOS detected"

2004 Jan 24
2
memdisk fails with 4 hdds
Hi everybody. Hardware: Several computers with Asus P/I-P55t2P4S motherboard, CPU Pentium MMX and K6-2/3, 128 to 384 MB RAM, Award 4.51PG Bios, Hard disks from 8 GB to 123.5 GB Realtek 8139D based NICs with PXE Boot-Proms PXELINUX 2.06 / MEMDISK 2.06: - fails to boot Compaq PC-DOS 3.31 PXELINUX 2.08 - succeeds to boot Compaq PC-DOS 3.31 with 0, 1, 2 and 3 hdds installed in
2006 Oct 24
1
Help request...recovering LVM on centos 4.2
I installed a Centos 4.x system using a lvm install across four HDDs. It is my first install using LVM. System had a power-failure and stopped booting up. A new trainee simply took out the HDDs and restarted the file-server on a fresh HDDs. Now the problemis that the four HDDs have data. But the order of the HDDs (of install....1st primary, 2nd primary etc.) is unknown. Earlier we used to boot
2013 Jan 16
3
Max hard disks supported by XCP 1.6
Hello, I would like to use nas4free under xcp 1.6. I install it under full HVM using "other install media". Now I am attaching 4 hdds as external disks. The vm sees at most two hdds, I suppose because of bios support (1 boot + 1 cdrom + 2 hdds= 4 hdds). I need to use more disks, is it possible? If not, it seems to me a serious limit. Mario
2020 Sep 19
1
storage for mailserver
On 9/17/20 4:25 PM, Phil Perry wrote: > On 17/09/2020 13:35, Michael Schumacher wrote: >> Hello Phil, >> >> Wednesday, September 16, 2020, 7:40:24 PM, you wrote: >> >> PP> You can achieve this with a hybrid RAID1 by mixing SSDs and HDDs, and >> PP> marking the HDD members as --write-mostly, meaning most of the reads >> PP> will come from the
2010 Sep 26
5
Need to pick your brain for recommendation on using 2.5" or 3.5" HDDs for Asterisk server...
Hi Everyone, I am stack between two identical systems (2U Twin2, 4 nodes, SuperMicro) servers that have the same exact specs except for HDDs. These nodes will all either have Asterisk installed with CentOS or will have Asterisk install in virtual environment. Option 1: *12* x 3.5" HDD (3 HDDs per node) Option 2: *24* x 2.5" HDD (6 HDDs per node) **both options come to the same price.
2014 Oct 09
3
dovecot replication (active-active) - server specs
Hello, i have some questions about the new dovecot replication and mdbox format. my company has currently 3 old dovecot 2.0.x fileserver/backend with ca. 120k mailboxes and ca. 6 TB data used. They are synchronised per drbd/corosync. Each fileserver/backend have ca. 40k mailboxes im Maildir format. Our MX server is delivering ca. 30 GB new mails per day. Two IMAP proxy server get the
2010 Jan 30
1
Multiple RAID support in CentOS?
Hello, I was wondering if someone could help me, I'm putting together a Server for personal use, I want to virtualize a few servers(mail, web, ssh) and use it as a NAS, but I have a question if I can use Multiple RAID Arrays using the following HW: Intel Xeon Quad Core X3430 ASUS P7F-M LGA 1156 - LSI MegaRAID(integrated) - HighPoint RocketRAID 2640x1 2 Hitachi 500GB HDDs 4 Hitachi 1TB HDDs
2020 Sep 17
2
storage for mailserver
Hello Phil, Wednesday, September 16, 2020, 7:40:24 PM, you wrote: PP> You can achieve this with a hybrid RAID1 by mixing SSDs and HDDs, and PP> marking the HDD members as --write-mostly, meaning most of the reads PP> will come from the faster SSDs retaining much of the speed advantage, PP> but you have the redundancy of both SSDs and HDDs in the array. PP> Read performance is
2011 Nov 08
6
Couple of questions about ZFS on laptops
Hello all, I am thinking about a new laptop. I see that there are a number of higher-performance models (incidenatlly, they are also marketed as "gamer" ones) which offer two SATA 2.5" bays and an SD flash card slot. Vendors usually position the two-HDD bay part as either "get lots of capacity with RAID0 over two HDDs, or get some capacity and some performance by mixing one
2007 Mar 17
3
Hellllp Pl: Centos 4.4 Default LVM install boot/recovery problem
Hello all Nill experience with LVM. Have a Default Centos 4.4 install updated till a week ago with three HDDs. System's not booting up since my staff pulled out the plug due to a short circuit nearby. Machine is a PIII 550 MHz, with 3 HDDs 40 GB, 120 GB (Actually is bigger but my bios detects only upto 120 GB) & 20 GB...about half filled with data & the backup server taken out in
2004 Dec 09
8
isolinux: Extremely broken BIOS detected
isolinux: Extremely broken BIOS detected Yoper 2.1 --------- ISOLINUX 2.11 2004-08-16 isolinux: Loading spec packet failed, trying to wing it... isolinux: Extremely broken BIOS detected, last ditch attempt with drive = 9F isolinux: Disk error 01, AX = 4209, drive 9F Boot failed: press a key to retry... Helix 1.5 --------- ISOLINUX 2.04 (Debian, 2003-06-06) isolinux: Loading spec packet failed,
2007 Nov 29
1
RAID, LVM, extra disks...
Hi, This is my current config: /dev/md0 -> 200 MB -> sda1 + sdd1 -> /boot /dev/md1 -> 36 GB -> sda2 + sdd2 -> form VolGroup00 with md2 /dev/md2 -> 18 GB -> sdb1 + sde1 -> form VolGroup00 with md1 sda,sdd -> 36 GB 10k SCSI HDDs sdb,sde -> 18 GB 10k SCSI HDDs I have added 2 36 GB 10K SCSI drives in it, they are detected as sdc and sdf. What should I do if I
2006 Mar 16
3
LSI Logic controller status
Hello, Recently we bought HP bl35 blades with LSI Logic SAS controllers. mpt* drivers works fine but I would like to somehow view status from command line. To monitor e.g. if one of the HDDs failed. I found mptutil on LSI Logic site but it just shows me configuration in quite cryptic form. Thanks, Mindaugas
2008 Jun 04
2
panic on `zfs export` with UNAVAIL disks
hi list, initial situation: SunOS alusol 5.11 snv_86 i86pc i386 i86pc SunOS Release 5.11 Version snv_86 64-bit 3 USB HDDs on 1 USB hub: zpool status: state: ONLINE NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM usbpool ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t0d0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t0d0p0
2013 Nov 25
0
Sysinux 6 will not boot ISOs on BIOS (i.e. pre-UEFI) systems
On 11/23/2013 09:35 AM, Carl Duff wrote: > -- Re-sent as original may be stuck at awaiting "authorisation" (originally > sent before I joined the mailing list) > > Hi All, > > It is impossible to boot Linux-based ISOs that use Syslinux 6.02 via CD or > DVD on older - non-UEFI - systems. Any attempt to do so will result in the > following error message: ISOLINUX
2017 Aug 16
6
extremely low performance on Samba 4.2.14-Debian
Le Fri, 11 Aug 2017 11:55:03 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait: > If you are going to upgrade, you might as well go for the highest > version you can, this will probably mean using Louis's packages. > > Samba is a rapidly changing program, a new minor version is released > every 6 months (approx) and the changes are significant. > >
2002 Aug 16
1
performance problems while building the filelist...
Hello Rsync PRO?s, i?m satisfied with the rsync features...never seen a better replication tool....!! ;-) But i have some problems...:-( OK, here me installation: - one Compac Proliant ML370 with cached SCSI HDDs and 1,2GHz and 1gb RAM... on this machine we have the Rsync deamon runnig to export the data we want to replicate - now we have 68 other NAS machines in our branch offices and this NAS
2005 Jul 25
3
RAID 5 vs. RAID 10
Hi, I am looking into purchasing a new server. This server will be mission-critical. I have read and somewhat understood the theories behind RAIDs 0, 1, 5, 10 & JBOD. However, I would like to get some feedback from those who have experience in implementing and recovering from a HDD failure using RAID. Hardware specs include:- Dual Xeon 3.2 GHz 2 GB RAM I would like to implement
2005 Dec 19
2
DELL SC430 + CentOS 4.0 + SATA HDDs
Dear gurus, Three DELL SC430s were purchased by my company a few months back and I've been told that when they spoke with the DELL representatives, they were informed that these servers were fully RHEL 4.0 compatible. Specs of the servers:- - Pentium 4 - 2.8 GHz - 1 GB RAM - 2x 250GB SATA HDDs I tried installing CentOS 4.0 on it but it doesn't seem to be able to detect any hard
2020 Sep 16
7
storage for mailserver
hi, I am planning to replace my old CentOS 6 mail server soon. Most details are quite obvious and do not need to be changed, but the old system was running on spinning discs and this is certainly not the best option for todays mail servers. With spinning discs, HW-RAID6 was the way to go to increase reliability and speed. Today, I get the feeling, that traditional RAID is not the best option for