similar to: com32's realloc function

From: Brett Walker <brett.walker at geometry.com.au> Remove a discrepancy between code comments and the definition for arena_header, ARENA_PADDING and free_arena_header. When the size of int and pointer are both 32-bits; and compiled with DEBUG_MALLOC undefined; the following are true: sizeof(arena_header) == 16 and sizeof(free_arena_header) == 56. To correct this, the type of _pad needs

Hi Devs, I've been doing some deep code diving and I seem to have found a discrepancy between code comments and reality. This difference could hint at a bug or performance degradation, but I doubt it. I thought to ask to get clarification. In syslinux/core/mem/malloc.h, the comments and definition for arena_header, ARENA_PADDING and free_arena_header are: /* * This structure should be a

Hello, I'm a student interested in the syslinux project of Gsoc. And Isincerely hope to have the opportunity to apply the "Dynamic linker/loader for modules" project. But it seems the #syslinux channel is not so active and I can't contact a mentor about that. Could anybody help me? Thank you!

From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming at intel.com> GCC 4.7 now places pointers to functions with the 'constructor' and 'destructor' function attributes in .init_array and .fini_array sections, respectively, whereas previously they were in the .ctors and .dtors sections. This change breaks the ctors/dtors code as it only expects function to be in the .ctors and .dtors sections,

On 11/04/2016 06:14 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > >> On 11/04/2016 04:38 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>> As a heads up RHEL 7.3 is released: >> >> <snip> >> >> 1. Is CentOS-7.3 done yet? Answer: NO! >> >> And it is NOT CentOS-7.3 .. it is CentOS-7 (1611)

I'm with Matthew Phelps on this. If CentOS is built with the exact same sources as RHEL, why not keep the numbering scheme the same? That would make life easier for people like me who build CentOS RPMs from tarballs/SRPMS that run on RHEL and having to look up version numbers is just idiotic. I mean, that's a Microsoft pet peeve of mine. This is also why I don't deploy CentOS as

Obligatory: When will Centos 5.4 be ready? /me goes down into reinforced concrete bunker and locks all hatches and doors.

Am 26.09.18 um 14:47 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > Hai, > > At this point i can not recommend to upgrade to 4.9.0 or 4.9.1, a > side note on this. The bug in question why im blocking it for > production, does not happen for domain members and AD-DC's but it's > still a risk in my opinion. Is that still true (oct 17th 2018)? Is that mentioned backend change

Evening all, First: Obligatory thanks to Tom. Shorewall is GREAT! I''ve got it on 3 machines now and love it. (Just because they are obligatory does not mean they are not heart-felt.) On my main web server, I am constantly scanning my log files for worm-signs. Requests for default.ida, any .exe, there are several others, you probably have your favorite. I got tired of doing it by hand

does this exist for CentOS 4 ? OK - next level of question then... taking a wild swing, I set up /etc/yum.repos/kde-redhat.repo and for S&G's, I ran the obligatory 'yum update' to see what would happen. It's an aggressive update to be sure. KDE 3.5.0 (and all the dependent stuff such as qt) but also samba and openoffice. Is anyone reporting happiness / contentment with

Hi guys, Just wanted to let everyone know that the paper we submitted to IEEE Trans. on Audio, Speech and Language Processing has just been accepted. You can find the manuscript (hasn't been edited by IEEE yet) at: http://people.xiph.org/~jm/papers/celt_tasl.pdf Along with Tim's LCA 2009 presentation at http://www.celt-codec.org/presentations/ these are the best sources of information

Sep 13 12:18:56 sfe fsck: /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 is mounted. Sep 13 12:18:56 sfe fsck: e2fsck: Cannot continue, aborting. Sep 13 12:18:56 sfe rc.sysinit: Checking root filesystem failed I had updated the box a few days ago but I had not rebooted with the new kernel. After the reboot, I get the root filesystem is not marked clean message and also that it was not mounted read-only. I supplied

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 07:50:32PM +0200, Andrew Holway wrote: >> No, certainly not instead of. A mailing list is essential. I'm part of a >> few slack communities and it seems an excellent platform for realtime >> discourse and noob baiting. Very sadly the #centos and #rhel freenode

Dear R-helpers: I created a folder containing R on a read-only CD and use it by having the R-icon, located on the Windows desktop, point to the CD (R-2.8.1\bin\Rgui.exe) for the "Target," and to a Windows Desktop folder for "Start in." This works nicely EXCEPT that the R help() function cannot display anything, and presents a screen message saying "This program cannot

Compiling xenbus_xs.o triggers this GCC warning: drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_xs.c:628:13: warning: function declaration isn?t a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes] Add the obvious and trivial fix. While we're touching this function add some equally obvious and trivial whitespace fixes. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle at tiscali.nl> --- 0) Triggered by compiling v3.7-rc1 using

Compiling xenbus_xs.o triggers this GCC warning: drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_xs.c:628:13: warning: function declaration isn?t a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes] Add the obvious and trivial fix. While we're touching this function add some equally obvious and trivial whitespace fixes. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle at tiscali.nl> --- 0) Triggered by compiling v3.7-rc1 using

I'm looking for a way to online resize a Windows disk -- i.e., be able to resize the disk without shutting down, rebooting, or detaching the disk. Is this at all possible? Or am I just barking up the wrong tree? I'm not finding a way to do this and even Amazon has a weird workaround, in which the user must write data to the newly resized-drive in order to recognize the new size

Hi: I am a newbie using grid and lattice. I want to update a xyplot without redrawing and I was wondering if there is a way of adding a point to a pointsGrob ? For example, take the example from the "R Graphics Book" page 218-219: grid.newpage() angle <- seq(0, 2*pi, length=21)[-21] x <- cos(angle) y <- sin(angle) xyplot( y ~ x, aspect = 1) Lets say I take the pointsGrob

Hi guys, I've been using blocks for a while and found that current behavior is error prone. So I am going to propose to you the better one. Motivation: 1) The __weak variables in blocks are very common pattern. So having any implicit default behavior makes thing worse. 2) Some stupid mistakes like: __weak typeof (self) theSelf = self; ...^ { theSelf.blabla = .. .... [self blabla];

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 11/04/2016 04:38 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > As a heads up RHEL 7.3 is released: > > <snip> > > 1. Is CentOS-7.3 done yet? Answer: NO! > > And it is NOT CentOS-7.3 .. it is CentOS-7 (1611) based on RHEL-7.3 > Sources. The main tree will be labeled '7.3.1611' on