similar to: tftpd-hpa file download status

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "tftpd-hpa file download status"

2005 Apr 15
3
pxelinux 2.11 unable to mount root fs
Hi, I've been using PxeLinux to boot our Debian kernel successfully for some time now. I recently increased the size of the ramdisk from about 484 MBs to 517 MBs and encountered the following error during bootup: --- RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0 Freeing initrd memory: 105519k EXT3-fs: Magic mismatch, very weird! cramfs: wrong magic sh-2021: reiserfs_read_super: can not find
2014 Jan 30
2
Issue with running tftpd-hpa in inetd mode?
> Correct. Like most UDP-based inetd services, tftpd is intended to be run in 'wait' mode. When the first request arrives, inetd starts the service but does not read the incoming packet (it can't, because it has no way to pass it along to the server). After that, inetd ignores that socket until the server exits. This isn't critical for tftp, but it does help to keep down the
2005 Feb 06
4
Can't get hpa-tftpd working on Slackware 9.1
Hi, I have a question on tftpd on Slackware - I know this is an embedded Linux forum, but I think it still must be the appropriate place to ask. I have hpa-tftpd V0.40 on Slackware 9.1. No matter what I do, I can't get files transferred to the tftp server. I just get timeouts - no messages in /var/log/messages or in /var/log/syslog - just dealthly silence. This is the configuration line
2010 Jul 09
2
atftpd versus tftpd-hpa
It seems that tftpd-hpa is more suitable at serving arbitrarily large files (greater than 65535 blocks long; with pxelinux.0 using a default block size of 1408 this is 92,273,280 bytes) as atftpd will complain in the log stating "Requested file to big, increase BLKSIZE". I saw that a while back HPA mentioned that atftpd was probably more scalable (number of clients) while tftpd-hpa is
2017 Jan 29
2
[PATCH tftpd-hpa] tftpd: don't use AI_CANONNAME and AI_ADDRCONFIG to resolve addresses for bind
AI_CANONNAME is only relevant when the resulting official name is used, which is not the case in tftpd for the address to bind to. Also AI_ADDRCONFIG isn't helpful. This flag is good for sockets used to connect(2) somewhere. But for listening sockets it makes tftpd fail to start when -a 0.0.0.0:69 is passed and no network device is up yet. This addresses Debian bug
2014 Jan 30
2
Issue with running tftpd-hpa in inetd mode?
Hopefully I'm not out to lunch here. I ported tftp-hpa to our proprietary OS, VOS (at stratus.com). We've always runs the old legacy tftpd from inetd, so I wanted to continue doing so with tftp-hpa. It seems to work okay, but I noticed that the code in tftpd.c has a 'while (1)' loop that has this at the end: /* * Now that we have read the request packet from
2015 Jul 29
2
Bug#793921: tftpd-hpa: IPv6 address cannonization breaks IPv4
Take 2 at bouncing this to the rest of the original recipients through a different MTA, since mail.zytor.com refused to accept it the first time. Please re-add Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at obsidianresearch.com> and 793921 at bugs.debian.org to the CC for replies. On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 05:34:00PM +0930, Ron wrote: > > Hi Jason, > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 03:45:30PM -0600, Jason
2004 Jan 13
1
tftpd-hpa suggestions
Hello, Peter and others! there are some issues regarding the tftp-hpa server: 1. Running as Windows service seems to require that the application does not detach (otherwise "net start" says smth. like "could not start, the service didn't report any errors"). The attached patch adds the option "-n", which can be used to have tftpd run in foreground.
2009 May 18
1
tftpd-hpa and pidfile
Hello, i've got a problem on lenny with tftpd-hpa When i launch it from /etc/init.d/tftpd-hpa start, there is no pidfile created. what is the way to get it ? thank you -- --------------------------------------------------------------- Pascal Legrand *IUT de Chartres* - _Service Informatique_ --------------------------------------------------------------- 1, place Roger Joly 28000 Chartres
2002 Sep 25
1
tftpd-hpa does not fork
hi, i try to get this tsize capable tftpd running, but it doesn't fork. (as read the strace output and the process table) strace: 9122 execve("/usr/sbin/in.tftpd", ["/usr/sbin/in.tftpd", "-u", "nobody", "-s", "/var/tftpboot/"], [/* 35 vars */]) = 0 9122 uname({sys="Linux", node="saturn", ...}) = 0 9122
2013 Aug 25
2
logging location of tftpd-hpa
Hello, On my previous TFTP server I had logging. I did see all requests in logfiles. On my current TFTP server I have also added the options '-v -v -v', but nog logging. At least I can't find it them in /var/log/*/* Where does tftpd-hpa writes it's logging? Groeten Geert Stappers -- Leven en laten leven
2006 Oct 29
1
tftpd-hpa issue: I think, anyway
I have spent the last two hours on this issue. I think there's a problem with tftp-hpa. Setup: attempting to use Debian FAI, but there is definitely a problem with PXELINUX. pxelinux.0 is obviously being loaded by clients, but *nothing* in the pxelinux.cfg directory can be loaded. Clients sit and spin on their MAC files and when they get to default nothing happens. This is
2013 Aug 26
1
logging location of tftpd-hpa
Op 2013-08-26 om 09:35 schreef John McDonnell: > On Behalf Of Geert Stappers > Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2013 6:42 AM > > > > On my previous TFTP server I had logging. I did see all requests > > in logfiles. > > > > On my current TFTP server I have also added the options '-v -v -v', > > but no logging. At least I can't find it them in
2002 Dec 26
1
tftp-hpa backport to openbsd tftpd
Hi I'm working on an update of the openbsd tftpd, mainly to support RFC 2349 (tsize option; and 2347-2348 too). In fact, i backport from tftp-hpa (which came from an old openbsd cvs). I know, i can use tftp-hpa but first it doesn't compile on openbsd, second, i hope the backport could be include in openbsd cvs ... does someone know a tftp client or a test to really know what is good or
2003 Oct 16
1
tftpd-hpa reports a wrong date
Hi, I have a weirdness with tftpd-hpa, it seems to report a wrong date in the syslog (2 hours early): root at sup01 > tail -f /var/log/syslog Oct 16 11:26:52 sup01 last message repeated 11 times Oct 16 11:28:06 sup01 ucd-snmp[425]: Connection from 62.210.191.157 Oct 16 09:28:33 sup01 in.tftpd[14495]: RRQ from 10.8.1.222 filename update.cfg Oct 16 11:30:01 sup01 /USR/SBIN/CRON[14521]: (root)
2014 Jun 03
1
tftpd-hpa: unixperms and umask
Hello, I have tried setting umask 0027 for tftpd, so files are created with permissions 0640. However, tftpd-hpa refused uploading a file with error "must have global write permissions". Looking at the source, I could avoid this issue by using "-p" option. However, it also seems that the umask is not applied when the "-p" option is used. Can anyone explain this
2003 Jan 13
1
tftpd-hpa filename remapping
I cannot seem to get the remap-file function of tftpd working right. I can sucessfully place files on the server but the remap feature is not working. I look in the logfile and it has an entry in there for tftpd. remap: input: startup-config Jan 13 21:47:50 proxy in.tftpd[25438]: remap: done Jan 13 21:47:50 proxy in.tftpd[25438]: RRQ from 192.168.0.12 filename startup-config I think that I
2012 Apr 17
1
tftpd-hpa: the tftpdir is ignored if --secure isn't used
If I omit --secure from the tftpd-hpa command line, I then need to e.g. `tftp -c get /var/lib/tftpboot/vmlinuz` instead of plain /vmlinuz, even though I pass /var/lib/tftpboot as the tftp dir in the tftpd-hpa command line. That essentially means that I'm exporting my whole /, which is clearly something I don't want to do. I basically want tftpd-hpa to serve files from /var/lib/tftpboot
2010 Mar 04
1
Making tftpd (hpa) firewall frienldy
Hello all, Tested on linux 2.6.18 (Centos5) and FreeBSD 7.0. You would execute it like below (which basically makes tftp reply back with same port is listening on ) tftpd --port-range 69:69 -4 -s /tftpboot/ --- tftp-hpa-0.49/tftpd/tftpd.c 2008-10-21 01:08:31.000000000 +0300 +++ tftp-hpa-0.49-tftpd-reuseport.c 2010-03-03 15:19:26.000000000 +0200 @@ -524,6 +524,11 @@ #ifndef __CYGWIN__
2017 Feb 03
2
Bug#771441: [PATCH tftpd-hpa] tftpd: don't use AI_CANONNAME and AI_ADDRCONFIG to resolve addresses for bind
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 03:40:32PM +1030, Ron wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 02:22:47PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 04:08:49PM +1030, Ron via Syslinux wrote: > > > > > The use of AI_PASSIVE here is a placebo. That flag has no effect unless > > > address was NULL, and if that was true, neither of the hunks here would > > >