similar to: in.tftpd not responding when listening on 255.255.255.255

Hello, we run samba 3.0.14a on FreeBSD. We recently upgraded our linux clients from FC2 to FC5. Now smbpasswd (on the client) does not work. We get the following error: "cli_pipe_validate_current_pdu: RPC fault code NT code 0x1c010002 received from remote machine sambaserver pipe \samr fnum 0x70f3! machine sambaserver rejected the password change: Error was : NT code 0x1c010002. Failed

Why tftpd doesn't support request from clients trying to tftp to the broadcast address? Will this feature ever appear in tftpd? Or is there any workaround for serving broadcast requests? Radek

Hi, I have been running TFTPD server for 3 weeks and performed about 100 deployments. After that, TFTPD started throwing the follwing errotrs in /var/log/messages Aug 20 21:52:55 RTP-OSP-Server tftpd[7146]: warning: cannot open /etc/hosts.allow: Too many open files Aug 20 21:52:55 RTP-OSP-Server tftpd[7146]: warning: cannot open /etc/hosts.deny: Too many open files Aug 20 21:52:55 RTP-OSP-Server

Hi, This is my current patch queue. The patches are independent, AFAIK, so feel free to cherry-pick or reject them independently. The bottom one was needed for a successful build here; the top one contains all the modifications you requested on IRC, and more. Meanwhile I hit one of the four stray TABs in tftpd.c, and decided to get rid of them. Comments welcome. --- Ferenc Wagner (5):

AI_CANONNAME is only relevant when the resulting official name is used, which is not the case in tftpd for the address to bind to. Also AI_ADDRCONFIG isn't helpful. This flag is good for sockets used to connect(2) somewhere. But for listening sockets it makes tftpd fail to start when -a 0.0.0.0:69 is passed and no network device is up yet. This addresses Debian bug

Hi, I've been struggling with this problem for the last couple of hours and am nowhere near solving the problem. I am trying to run a tftp server in a chroot jail. Now perhaps I am being paranoid, but I would like to have it launched from within its own jail even if it supposedly does a chroot itself and runs with a parameterizable user. I downloaded the atftp-server package and tried

The default path is /var/run/tftpd-hpa.pid, which can be overridden by the newly introduced -P option. On normal termination (SIGTERM or SIGINT) the pid file is automatically removed. Moved setting the umask later, right before entering the select loop, so that it does not affect the permissions of the pid file. Signed-off-by: Ferenc Wagner <wferi at niif.hu> --- tftpd/tftpd.c | 38

I configure the system of remote boot. Almost all was done. But one simple problem. tftp doesn't download pxelinux.0 from boot-server, in.tftpd is running at. Problem isn't in pxelinux.0, but in protocol itself. I've created test file "test" in /tftpboot and tried to download it but "Timeout occured". From /var/log/messages: Mar 27 16:32:27 dk in.tftpd[26576]:

Hi, I have a question on tftpd on Slackware - I know this is an embedded Linux forum, but I think it still must be the appropriate place to ask. I have hpa-tftpd V0.40 on Slackware 9.1. No matter what I do, I can't get files transferred to the tftp server. I just get timeouts - no messages in /var/log/messages or in /var/log/syslog - just dealthly silence. This is the configuration line

Hi! I am using OpenBSD 4.4 with the build-in TFTP-Daemon for PXE. Distributing OpenBSD works fine. Now I want to distribute OpenBSD and WinPE. I've installed PXELinux 3.72 and configured it. Works also fine for PXELinux and distributing OpenBSD. To distribute WinPE I need a remap rule (\ -> /) for the TFTP-Daemon. I've created a file /etc/tftpd.remap with the following rule: rgG \\ /

I have a tftpd server S running on centos 7 and managed by systemd It is not respoding to A server which is sending the tftp read request RRQ. I do see the RRQ packets coming from A to S, but S never responds back from a different port Y to A So this part is working fine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trivial_File_Transfer_Protocol#/media/File:Tftp-rrq.svg But I do not see any attempts to

> Correct. Like most UDP-based inetd services, tftpd is intended to be run in 'wait' mode. When the first request arrives, inetd starts the service but does not read the incoming packet (it can't, because it has no way to pass it along to the server). After that, inetd ignores that socket until the server exits. This isn't critical for tftp, but it does help to keep down the

Hello, we have two diskless machines in a routed network. Both get their IP adresse and tftp configuration via dhcp. When we start one machine all works well, when the second machine tries to download the kernel via tftp we get this error: Jul 8 09:49:52 voyager2 in.tftpd[8374]: RRQ from 10.63.5.122 filename /andreas/pxelinux.0 Jul 8 09:49:53 voyager2 in.tftpd[8374]: tftpd: read: Connection

Take 2 at bouncing this to the rest of the original recipients through a different MTA, since mail.zytor.com refused to accept it the first time. Please re-add Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at obsidianresearch.com> and 793921 at bugs.debian.org to the CC for replies. On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 05:34:00PM +0930, Ron wrote: > > Hi Jason, > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 03:45:30PM -0600, Jason

It seems that tftpd-hpa is more suitable at serving arbitrarily large files (greater than 65535 blocks long; with pxelinux.0 using a default block size of 1408 this is 92,273,280 bytes) as atftpd will complain in the log stating "Requested file to big, increase BLKSIZE". I saw that a while back HPA mentioned that atftpd was probably more scalable (number of clients) while tftpd-hpa is

Hopefully I'm not out to lunch here. I ported tftp-hpa to our proprietary OS, VOS (at stratus.com). We've always runs the old legacy tftpd from inetd, so I wanted to continue doing so with tftp-hpa. It seems to work okay, but I noticed that the code in tftpd.c has a 'while (1)' loop that has this at the end: /* * Now that we have read the request packet from

I''ve been poking around my system, and realized that having a tftp server would be handy. (I''m working with cisco routers, which have the capability to up and download configuration images via tftp.) However, I''m not content with the usual tftpd that comes with Linux. The whole "specify each directory you want" scheme is cock-eyed to me. I''d prefer

Hello, Peter and others! there are some issues regarding the tftp-hpa server: 1. Running as Windows service seems to require that the application does not detach (otherwise "net start" says smth. like "could not start, the service didn't report any errors"). The attached patch adds the option "-n", which can be used to have tftpd run in foreground.

Hi all, Sorry for posting here - but I figured there are many people with Cisco IP phones here - and I use them with Asterisk :-) I have a couple of Cisco 7940 phones. I've loaded the SIP firmware OK, loaded the SIP configuration files OK, they work with Asterisk just fine. My question is - will I have to keep on running the tftp server for them for ever and ever? Isn't there any

On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 03:40:32PM +1030, Ron wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 02:22:47PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 04:08:49PM +1030, Ron via Syslinux wrote: > > > > > The use of AI_PASSIVE here is a placebo. That flag has no effect unless > > > address was NULL, and if that was true, neither of the hunks here would > > >