similar to: SYSLINUX mailing list now subscriber-only

On 02/12/2018 11:00, Hendrik Boom wrote: > There's an extensive email etiquette post somewhere on the net > explaining why setting 'reply-to' to the list is a bad idea. Lots of posts around about this, all self serving :) There may of course be an RFC floating around, but I admit to never having bothered to look, because good netizens reply to list, lists are public, they

Given the recent spam epidemic, I would like to hear people's opinion on switching this list to subscribed-post only (all non-subscribers would have their posts held for moderation.) -hpa

Traffic on the klibc list has recently been very low, and unfortunately in the meantime, spam has picked up. I'd like to poll the subscribership again if we should switch to subscriber-post-only to curb the spam. -hpa

With the latest message I send to the CentOS list I got this strange 'probe' message. The included bounce example has nothing to do with my email-adres, but rather with someone subscribed to the list. So it seems that somehow the mailinglist manager is sending bounces to the wrong email-adres. Or I do not understand the 'probe' message (and the included bounce message) at all.

Dear All, I am using R to do my work and thank you very much for developing, maintaining and making such excellent software available to anyone that is interested enough to ask for it. I have registered at Nabble. I was wondering the right forum for me to send my help request. I have tried sending to R-help at r-project.org. However, I do receive a kind of warning email stating that my email

Attention all List Members: We are in the process of migrating all Red Hat lists from the current list manager software/server running qmail/Smartlist to a new server running postfix and GNU Mailman (*). Within the next week you will receive more information about this migration including information on how to access your membership, including subscribe/unsubscribe information and instructions on

I'm wondering if people would think it would be a good thing or bad thing to create a separate mailing list for Syslinux development. We are having a large number of active developers by now, and it would be good to discuss things more explicitly via email, as opposed to IRC, so everyone gets it. However, it's not clear to me if it would be better to just leave it on this mailing list,

On 2/20/19 5:22 PM, H. Peter Anvin via Syslinux wrote: > On 2/18/19 8:56 AM, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: >> >> BTW, until very recently, we used to have a "syslinux-commits" mailing >> list (and its archive). >> >> Would it be possible to have "syslinux-commits" back (and its archive)? >> >> IIRC, it was "linked" to the

Umm. First of all, I *AM* a member of this list, unless someone else unsubcribed me. If so, please put me back on. I've gone through my archives and I am very clearly subscribed to the list. The monthly freebsd.org mailing list memberships reminder tells me I am. List Password // URL ---- --------

Hi all, I have set up a mailing list that will track all the commits done to the Syslinux git tree. To subscribe, go to: http://www.zytor.com/mailman/listinfo/syslinux-commits This is not a user-postable list; all the contents is automatically generated commit messages. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

mailing list subscription and C/R system mail does not harmonize! Warren - whoever you are - please subscribe with a mail address which accepts delivery without such nasty bounces! (Got the bounce instantly to my last reply to "Error when starting apache".) Alexander -----Weitergeleitete Nachricht----- > From: centos.5.warren at recursor.net > To: ad+lists at uni-x.org >

Op 20101028 om 15:57 schreef H. Peter Anvin: > On 10/28/2010 02:08 AM, Stappers wrote: > > Op 20101008 om 11:09 schreef > >> > > > > @hpa: What is possible for delegating "clearance of non-subscriber postings"? > > > > I'd be happy to give it to anyone who wants to volunteer. Here is 1 volunteer :-) My idea is to help hpa with

Syslinux 3.86 is out; it is a bug fix release. Syslinux 4.00, starting with Syslinux 4.00-pre38, is now officially in beta test. Special thanks to Intel Corporation, my current employer, for their support for my Syslinux work. Changes in 3.86: * chain.c32: fix chainloading the MBR of a hard disk (broken in 3.85). * mboot.c32: report the boot loader name in the information structure. *

Hi all, Recently there has been a flurry of spam to this mailing list. I'm considering switching the list to "subscriber post only" as a result. If you send from and receive to different addresses (like I do, for example), you need to subscribe your send-from address as a "no mail" address. Would people object to this scheme? -hpa

Hello, Usually is it easy to identify a valid non-subscriber-posting. Example given: the four postings about "bugzilla is back" in last day. Today there is a posting from the data plane development kit project, http://dpdk.org/ DPDK is a set of libraries and drivers for fast packet processing. Packets being network packets. That posting is not spam, but it should not go to this

Op 2/16/2018 om 3:36 AM schreef @lbutlr: > Before I spend a lot of time trying to replicate a procmail script that automatically sorts list mail into mailboxes based on the List-ID header (and possibly some other data) I thought I'd check if someone had already done this for sieve. > > Basically, what I do now in procmail is > > 1. Get the listname from the List-ID header (or

On 2/18/19 8:56 AM, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: > > BTW, until very recently, we used to have a "syslinux-commits" mailing > list (and its archive). > > Would it be possible to have "syslinux-commits" back (and its archive)? > > IIRC, it was "linked" to the commits published at > > git.zytor.com/syslinux/syslinux.git/ > > but

> We now have a new archive repo at zytor.com. Almost all resources and > communication channels depend on zytor.com being on-line, including the > mailing list itself. > > Please note how the "bounces..." address is still "at zytor.com". > Whether that has any (positive or negative) influence in some case / > support / troubleshooting / configuration,

On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Jeff Bailey <jbailey at raspberryginger.com> wrote: > The only question that comes to mind is the future of klibc. Is there > still potential for merging at some point? In ubuntu we never got to > where we could do without glibc to do what? dual and quad cores in laptop with vista or similar (X based) operating systems are no better, than

On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Geert Stappers via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 09:13:19PM +0200, Patrick Masotta via Syslinux wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 09:27:06AM -0400, Shao Miller via Syslinux wrote: >> > On 3/18/2016 10:57, Patrick Masotta via Syslinux wrote: >> > >I stopped receiving e-mails from the list.