similar to: pxelinux with localboot and etherboot

Hi, [I sent this mail again because my previous mail was rejected by ML for some reason] This topic is originally from etherboot ML. When we specify "localboot" for pxelinux loaded from etherboot, this option doesn't work( it doesn't boot from local harddrive ). pxelinux returns to PXE with localboot return code but etherboot doesn't check it. I was trying to change

Folks, When I run syslinux on my Sandisk Cruzer (512MB) USB flash RAM with the "syslinux /dev/sda" , it corrupts the partition table that I had already created on my USB device. It attempts to boot but eventually fails trying to load the kernel. If I try "syslinux /dev/sda1", the USB device fail to boot at all. I would think that /dev/sda would be the correct device to use if

diff --git a/core/localboot.c b/core/localboot.c index 0b8769e4..30bfb272 100644 --- a/core/localboot.c +++ b/core/localboot.c @@ -63,7 +63,6 @@ __export void local_boot(int16_t ax) ireg.eax.w[0] = 0; /* Reset drive */ __intcall(0x13, &ireg, NULL); - memset(&ireg, 0, sizeof(ireg)); ireg.eax.w[0] = 0x0201; /* Read one sector */ ireg.ecx.w[0] = 0x0001; /* C/H/S = 0/0/1 (first

Hi, "David Ehrmann" <exobyte at bigvalley.net> schrieb am 10.07.03 11:02:54: > I've been doing that for a while, but I seem to be finding conflicting > information. Some sources focus on the boot ROM aspect of etherboot > while others think etherboot is an alternative to PXE. Correct me if I'm > wrong, but it seems like there is etherboot the program and

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0982 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0982.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 218bebfd4e15d2f7a70a030cd1a27cb3 etherboot-pxes-5.4.4-15.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm 6d870664352a31e92c5c604e401960a6 etherboot-roms-5.4.4-15.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm

On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Quinn wrote: > I have now also tried etherboot on a AMD Athlon machine with a 3Com 905B > NIC, etherboot 5.3.14 and pxelinux.0-3.08-pre5. Here is the results: > > Etherboot 5.3.14 (GPL) http://etherboot.org > Drivers: 3C90X Images: NBI ELF PXE Exports: PXE > Protocols: DHCP TFTP > Relocating _text from: [00010420,00022880) to [5feedba0,5ff00000) >

Hello PXE folk, I mentioned in another thread that I had problems finding an etherboot that actually works with a 486 and Realtek 8019/NE2000 card. Etherboot worked up until v 5.3.5-mc1 with the ne driver but then stopped working between 5.3.7 to 5.3.13 (anoying since 5.3.7 started supporting PXELINUX. But then I downloaded 5.3.14 and it seems to work again with the ne driver (finally

CentOS-Virt, I ran into an error attempting to offer two boot options using libvirt with kvm. I wanted the virtual to first attempt to boot from its "disk" and if that didn't work, fall back on netboot (we kickstart install). This argument is "-boot cn". If the disk you provide is of type IDE this will probably work for you, unless you use "-drive" with the

PXE-On-A-Disk from (ftp://ftp.scyld.com/private/jlehan/pxe-on-a-disk.html) was posted on syslinux mailing list: http://syslinux.zytor.com/archives/2005-December/006222.html. It is being mentioned by syslinux wiki, or some other documentation of syslinux that I currently can't find. I tried etherboot2ethersel.pl from PXE-On-A-Disk (ftp://ftp.scyld.com/private/jlehan/pxe-on-a-disk.html)

Tim Legge has passed the following message on to me: hpa wrote: > Quinn wrote: > > Now it seems I have found a bug in PXELINUX with regards to etherboot. > > Up until 2.07 pxelinux was responsive to the keyboard. From 2.08 and > > up the keyboard is locked at the boot prompt when pxelinux is loaded > > via etherboot 5.3.14. > > That would not be a PXELINUX bug,

Folks: I've used etherboot to create a zrom that successfully brings a image of a bootable floppy into high memory. What I'd like to do is glue memdisk in so that it can hook int13 and serve the transferred image for booting when etherboot hands control back to the BIOS. The trick, and this is where I'd appreciate "gotchas", pointers or "this is an approach I

Hi there, I do not know if it has to do with my english knowledge, but I tried several times to understand the difference beetween Etherboot and PXE-Linux. I know that Etherboot can be put on a Nic's ROM, but for what on h*ll then is the Etherboot floppy for? Please, could someone explain me stupid person these things? Thanks a lot. Greets, Thorsten

Hi, is there any way to simulate a PXE boot from an Etherboot ROM? Background: I am using PXES in a customer project. PXES supports bootsplash only via pxelinux. The customer machines only have old ISA network cards for which there appears to be no PXE boot rom so I have to use Etherboot. Maybe one could build an NBI image from pxelinux.0 somehow ??? Use a newer etherboot image as a second

On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 3:37 AM Victor Sologoubov via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > > diff --git a/core/localboot.c b/core/localboot.c > index 0b8769e4..30bfb272 100644 > --- a/core/localboot.c > +++ b/core/localboot.c > @@ -63,7 +63,6 @@ __export void local_boot(int16_t ax) > ireg.eax.w[0] = 0; /* Reset drive */ > __intcall(0x13,

Our site has many Dell OptiPlex 790s, all of which are unable to use the 'localboot' PXELINUX option as they either hang at 'Booting from local disk...' or immediately reboot depending on which SYSLINUX version is used. Many people have suggested using chain.c32 to chain load the local disk as a workaround, but this causes problems with Windows 7 BitLocker as it detects the chain

Hi, Anyone has tried to use pxechain with Etherboot? Here is my problem: The Etherboot client had no problem to get the list of install servers manual from the pxechain. But didn't matter which server was chosen, Etherboot client always tried to use the first server to do the installation. Etherboot 5.4 was used. What the problem may be? PXEchain or Etherboot? Thanks, Joyce --

Question for people... Has anyone actually tried running PXELINUX on top of Etherboot? There is something in Etherboot 5.1.7 called FREEBSD_PXEEMU, which seems to be a PXE stack subset, in particular it seems to support the following calls: PXENV_GET_CACHED_INFO PXENV_UDP_OPEN PXENV_UDP_WRITE PXENV_UDP_READ PXENV_UDP_CLOSE PXENV_UNLOAD_STACK PXENV_UNDI_SHUTDOWN This happens to be pretty

Hi, Peter Lister <P.Lister at sychron.com> schrieb am 06.02.02: > In way way better and easier? When I have criticised pxelinux I think > I've always stated *why* etherboot seems better for our environment. > > I'm not trying to be religious, or get anyone to change a working system > - I'm genuinely interested what differences others perceive. I've looked

Upstream etherboot accepted a patch (attached) to fix wrapping of the TFTP block index. Without the patch we are unable to boot recent Solaris over the network in HVM guests (because our miniroot now exceeds 64k blocks). Whilst unstable has moved on to gpxe (which doesn''t suffer from this problem), it would be useful to us for this to be fixed in the stable series. Any preferences on

Hi, I am trying to use syslinux and etherboot together to network boot my clients. I am able to load my 2.4 Kernel without problems. However, when I try to load a 2.6 Kernel, I get this error: Could not find ramdisk image: miniroot.gz My initrd, named miniroot, does exist and I really don't know why syslinux is not able to find it. Can anyone give me some pointers? Thanks.