similar to: syslinux 2.04 and linux 2.4.21?

Hi! Am 09.04.20 um 10:07 schrieb Rob Kampen: [...] > I too had fail2ban fail after an otherwise successful yum update. Mine occurred in Feb when my versions of firewalld etc were updated to the versions you show. Thus far I have not had the opportunity to sort the problem. Lockdown has been quite busy so far, hopefully some slower times coming next week. Yeah, those pesky real-life biological

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi! I see some strange errors on a samba-3.0.2a PDC and fileserver running under Linux. Every now and then users are not able to access some random file. Windows tells the user that the "file is already opened" or some similar error message (it's an error message in german) The files are varying, I see all kinds of filenames where

Hi, I'm running 3.0.4 and have had several reports from users both using Office and Lotus where the application tells them that the file is already in use when we know it isn't. (BTW, there's a typo on the man page under "lock spin count". "acquired", not "aquired".) Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic

Hi! I already posted this question to the samba-ntdom list a few days ago, but haven't got a single answer so far :-( Learning that the ntdom list will be shut down shortly, I figured that this list is a more appropriate place to ask. Isn't it? So, this is the challenge: We have samba 2.2.0 running as PDC for a domain with about 30 NT workstations (up to SP6). We are using

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi! I think I stumbled on at least two bugs in the CentOS 7.2 pacemaker package, though I'm not quite sure if or where to report it. I'm using the following package to set up a 2-node active/passive cluster: [root at clnode1 ~]# rpm -q pacemaker pacemaker-1.1.13-10.el7_2.4.x86_64 The installation is up-to-date on both nodes as of the

Hi! I have a server running CentOS 7.7 (1908) with all current patches installed. I think this server should be a quite standard installation with no specialities On this server I have fail2ban with an apache and openvpn configuration. I'm using firewalld to manage the firewall rules. Fail2an is configured to use firewalld: [root at server ~]# ll /etc/fail2ban/jail.d/ insgesamt 12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi! I have a user who is running a Samba server to store data files for his ArcView 3.3 application. Client operating system is Windows XP professional. With Samba2 (2.2.8a) this was working quite fine, it usually took less than a few seconds to load and render one of the GIS presentations with ArcView. We then did an upgrade to Samba3 (3.0.20b)

On 07/18/18 12:24, Andrew Holway wrote: >> >>> Still a lot better than trying to run your own hodge-podge of nightmares >>> on Linux. >> >> Beg pardon? Did I make a mistake on the email address? I thought this went >> to the CentOS general discussion list. >> > > I specifically meant setting up and running email services on linux is not >

Have you checked the network end of things? This is the same type of thing I see when the NIC and ethernet switch don't autonegotiate to the same settings. Hope I didn't step on anybody's toes here. I'm new to the list. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tony Hoover, Network Administrator KSU - Salina, College of Technology and

On 13/04/20 1:30 pm, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 4/9/20 6:31 AM, Andreas Haumer wrote: > ... >> I'm neither a fail2ban nor a SELinux expert, but it seems the >> standard fail2ban SELinux policy as provided by CentOS 7 is not >> sufficient anymore and the recent updates did not correctly >> update the required SELinux policies. >> >> I could report this

On 2018-03-26, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: > > Quite time ago we had a stripped setup here working only with Openldap and > PAM modules. LDAP with replication for redundancy, centralized communication > with local CA and over TLS. It worked very well. The successor of such setup > is SSSD for EL7 but the above should be still a feasible solution.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi! For some months now I'm hunting a Samba performance problem without a solution yet. Now I'm hoping someone on this list has an idea (In fact, I already reported the problem to the mailing list but got only one reply which did not help) So I'm here for another try... Here's the situation: Some of our users runs Windows XP with

On 9/04/20 7:48 pm, Andreas Haumer wrote: > Hi! > > I have a server running CentOS 7.7 (1908) with all current patches installed. > I think this server should be a quite standard installation with no specialities > > On this server I have fail2ban with an apache and openvpn configuration. > I'm using firewalld to manage the firewall rules. > > Fail2an is configured

On 4/9/20 6:31 AM, Andreas Haumer wrote: ... > I'm neither a fail2ban nor a SELinux expert, but it seems the > standard fail2ban SELinux policy as provided by CentOS 7 is not > sufficient anymore and the recent updates did not correctly > update the required SELinux policies. > > I could report this as bug, but where does such a bugreport belong to > in the first place?

Am 17.04.20 um 02:59 schrieb Rob Kampen: > On 13/04/20 1:30 pm, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> On 4/9/20 6:31 AM, Andreas Haumer wrote: >> ... >>> I'm neither a fail2ban nor a SELinux expert, but it seems the >>> standard fail2ban SELinux policy as provided by CentOS 7 is not >>> sufficient anymore and the recent updates did not correctly >>>

Hi! I'm currently hunting a strange problem and looking for help! I have a samba3 fileserver (currently samba-3.0.20b, but problem can be reproduced with samba-3.0.7, but _not_ with samba2 like 2.2.8a), and I see performance problems when writing files with MS word 2002 SP3 from a NT4.0 (SP6a) workstation. Saving even the smallest file takes more than 10 seconds! Copying files with Windows

Thanks & Regards Hitesh Lad Jr. System Administrator Suma Soft Pvt. Ltd., Pune. ----- Original Message ----- From: <samba-request@lists.samba.org> To: <samba@lists.samba.org> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 8:49 AM Subject: samba Digest, Vol 50, Issue 11 > Send samba mailing list submissions to > samba@lists.samba.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World

In the light of the rather serious MEMDISK bug in 2.03, I would like to promote 2.04-pre2 to 2.04 some time this evening, California time. Please try it out -- especially PXELINUX and MEMDISK -- if you have the opportunity. Thanks! -hpa

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > reassign 474509 xen-3 Bug#474509: xen: Please enable support for loading bzImages with v2.08 of the x86 bootloader protocol Warning: Unknown package 'xen' Bug reassigned from package `xen' to `xen-3'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

I'm trying to display a picture on a bootable CD that I'm working on. I tried isolinux-debug.bin, and the printouts we not very helpful. I see 'isolinux: Configuration file opened...', and then it displays the text from my display file (but not the image). Here's the strange thing, syslinux displays the image just fine. I take the appropriate files from the CD, copy