similar to: Promise ATA RAID Workaround

Hello friends, I'm having a problem with my home server (ASUS A7V133 motherboard) which has a horrible performance with ATA disks connected to an integrated promise controller. Below you can see iozone results of the same disk connected to the primary/ secondary controller versus the promise one. Promise ATA100 controller: ========================= Version 1.02a ------Sequential

Today our server had seriuos problems, we had to reinitiate it and run fsck manually. Dou you think it's an ext3, kernel (vanilla 2.4.19) or hardware bug? The errors were (from syslog): -------------------------------- Oct 6 16:10:25 nou kernel: attempt to access beyond end of device Oct 6 16:10:25 nou kernel: 72:02: rw=0, want=230266240, limit=4882432 Oct 6 16:10:25 nou kernel: attempt

(Suggestions for other forums in which to post this question are welcome.) We have CentOS 3.6 x86_64 running on a server with dual 2.2GHz Opterons and a Promise UltraTrak RM8000 connected via an Adaptec SCSI card. We are seeing what seems to be gradual I/O performance degradation over time; it seems to be OK for up to about 90 days, but not long after that both CPUs end up continuously spending

Hello. I would like to know if promise RAID cards are compatible with CentOS / RHEL ? I have seen that only SATA is supported on the RHEL hardware compatibility list. The other ATA raid cards seems not to be compatible. They give source code and promise grants compatibility with RedHat 8 and 9 but not RHEL. I would like to know if somebody tried a ATA raid card like Fasttrack TX2000, SX4000,

Dear Everybody, I am telling you the whole story, perhaps you can give me a better idea. Almost 3 years ago I purchased Arima HDAMA rev. G motherboard with integrated Silicon Image Sil3114 Serial ATA 4 Ports SATA I adapter. ( http://www.arimacorp.com/ViewProduct.asp?View=86 ) . BIOS version is 2.13. My intention is to make a file server, using linux software raid, so I bought 2 new shiny 1TB

There's an Apple internal bug for that. I've cloned it to Bugzilla as: <http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5034> Implement __builtin_eh_return_data_regno() I can probably make the cmake configure stage fail up front if none of the supported mechanisms are found. I'll look at that. Thanks for the feedback! Shantonu Sent from my MacBook On Sep 22, 2009, at 9:01 PM,

Clang does indeed built it with one warning. [ 55%] Building C object lib/CMakeFiles/CompilerRT-Common.dir/gcc_personality_v0.c.o /export/home/edward/lab/llvm/build/compiler-rt/lib/gcc_personality_v0.c:232:36: warning: implicit declaration of function '__builtin_eh_return_data_regno' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] _Unwind_SetGR(context,

I'm trying to setup sendmail/dovecot on a new server running CentOS-6 (well, CentOS-6.2 now). Everything seems to go well, but when I run fetchmail I get this warning: ------------------------------------ [tim at grover ~]$ fetchmail imap.maths.tcd.ie fetchmail: Warning: the connection is insecure, continuing anyways. (Better use --sslcertck!) ------------------------------------ I should

Seems pretty clear cut to me. #if defined(HAVE_OSATOMIC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_INT) && defined (HAVE_OSATOMIC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_LONG) ... #elif defined(__WIN32__) ... #elif defined(HAVE_SYNC_BOOL_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_INT) && defined (HAVE_SYNC_BOOL_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_LONG) ... #else #error unknown atomic compare-and-swap primitive #endif The problem isn't mismatched #if/#endif. The

On Nov 12, 2009, at 10:25 AM, Edward O'Callaghan wrote: > No, its up to them which backend they want to use. > Sounds like they think that GCC is super quick compared to LLVM. Looks > like another fud fart out of google to me. Edward, this is no place for comments like this. Evan > > 2009/11/12 Jon McLachlan <mclachlan at apple.com>: >> Any plans to make LLVM

G'Day, Following Daniels comments about semantics of the sys::Path API, he has convinced me otherwise as the driver doesn't make or remove directories, so his semantics do indeed make more sense in this context. Fixes applied here; LLVM: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=89848 Clang: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=89849 Thanks everyone

Good day Tanya, I would just like to clarify this for myself and a few other people who maybe wondering, Does this code freeze apply to; * Clang. * Compiler-RT. Thanks for your time, Best Regards, Edward O'Callaghan. 2009/8/17 Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com>: > LLVMers, > > The 2.6 code freeze is this friday, August 21, at 9pm PDT. > > All major changes should

No, As it worked fine before. I can't see the #if that goes with +#elif defined(__WIN32__) as you removed -#if TARGET_OS_MAC. Please go over your #if / #endif blocks and trail the #endif with a comment. I am willing to bet there is a problem there. Thanks for your time, Edward. 2009/9/23 Shantonu Sen <ssen at apple.com>: > Sounds like your system compiler doesn't support

Sounds like your system compiler doesn't support gcc-style builtin atomics. Please use a different compiler? Shantonu Sent from my MacBook On Sep 22, 2009, at 7:54 PM, Edward O'Callaghan wrote: > Breaks Builds on Solaris and AuroraUX with: > > bash-3.2$ make > Scanning dependencies of target BlocksRuntime > [ 1%] Building C object

Good day all, Initial Ada bindings have been introduced for the LLVM 2.6 release. Unfortunately no one was able/had time to help me better integrate it into the LLVM build system. Thus, It has been left with a GPR Ada project file for building the bindings, anyone using the Ada bindings will know what this is and how to handle it. However, in future as these bindings improve/progress. We should

Good day, I been working on the CMake build system (which is nice and portable) + code clean ups over the whole Compiler-RT software suit. I recently added Blocks to the CMake build system but there is some ugly looking warnings I need to fix up in the Blocks code which I have not had time to look into yet. N.B. The CMake build system is not complete yet due to my lack of time, however I am still

1. Is there some way to copy a promise so that the copy has the same expression in its promise as the original. In the following we y is a promise that we want to copy to z. We want z to be a promise based on the expression x since y is a promise based on the expression x. Thus the answer to the code below is desired to be z=2 but its 1, 1 and y in the next three examples so they are not the

When an attribute is a delayed expression sometimes it is not forced when it is extracted. > x <- list() > attr(x, "p") <- delay(1) > x list() attr(,"p") <promise: 0x11e4bb8> > val <- attr(x, "p") > val [1] 1 > attr(x, "p") <promise: 0x11e4bb8> I am not quite sure whether the above is a bug or not but I think

Dear Soeren, a couple of months ago, namely > revision 1.8 > date: 2003/05/01 06:20:50; author: sos; state: Exp; lines: +17 -2 > I'm pleased to announce that Promise is now supporting the FreeBSD > project by providing documentation (under NDA) and hardware for > testing. This commit is the first result of the cooperation, and > adds support for several of their new

I fetchmail on my CentOS-6.2 from 4 servers. One always gives the warning ----------------------------- [tim at grover cron.d]$ fetchmail -a go.tcd.ie fetchmail: Error exchanging credentials 6 messages for tmurphy at go.tcd.ie. reading message tmurphy at go.tcd.ie:1 of 6 (2978 header octets) (2639 body octets) flushed ... ----------------------------- The messages seem to come over OK, so it