similar to: boot failing with large cd's?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "boot failing with large cd's?"

2007 Apr 28
1
freeRADIUS with winbindd, ntlm_auth on Samba 3.0.24
Hello I want to use ntlm_auth together with winbindd for RADIUS-authentication of users against the users of a Samba-server. The freeRADIUS-daemon and the Samba-, winbindd- and ntlm_auth binaries are all on the same machine. Samba works fine and the whole setup worked fine with Samba 3.0.22. Actually I have to set up this scenario on a machine with Samba 3.0.24 and it does not work at all :-(.
2014 Jan 16
1
Mounting Snapshots
Hello I am doing a research project (http://www.ites-project.org/) and want to be able to mount VM images (all kinds of VMs, starting with VirtualBox). For that libguestfs seems perfect. I am already able to mount the base HD, but I was not able to additionally mount the overlaying Snapshot files. Is there a way to mount several HD files onto each other ? Thanks Thorsten Sick -- Thorsten Sick
1999 Sep 22
1
Samba and Visual C++
I've just tried to install MS Visual C++ 6.0 on our Samba 2.0.5a Linux Server. When I was asked for the installation directory I tried to use a samba-share that was mounted on a network drive letter. Just after this the setup programm refused the path as incorrect. Now the question: Is it impossible to install the VC6 package server based? I don't wan't to install this big package on
2004 Nov 12
0
[Very Strange] Windows Networking suddendly stopped working
Hi list, I hope that maybe one of you can shed some light on this, as this is a very strange case and I don't even have the slightest clue from what this symptom may all come from. Maybe not Samba, maybe Hardware, maybe buggy windows ..... Problem: We have running a Samba 3.0.7 (from backports.org) Debian 3.0 STABLE Server here for over a year now. On Tuesday this week we got the first
2003 Mar 20
0
X-Post from Linux-RAID [Re: I just trashed my RAID5 array - recovery possible?]
Hi, originally I posted this to linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, but I guess there are chances that someone in here might comment on it as well. TIA. * Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au> [2003-03-20 10:58]: > On Thursday March 20, lists@schlich.org wrote: > > > > And when I try to mount the array: > > --8<-- > > EXT3-fs error (device md(9,1)):
1999 Jul 13
1
/packaging/SuSE/6.0
Hie all, I'm trying to use samba 2.0.4b on a SuSE 6.1 Linux box. What should I do with these two files : samba-2.0.0.dif samba.spec from the samba-2.0.4b/packaging/SuSE/6.0 directory. Is there any modification to do to have samba running without problems on SuSE 6.1 ? Thanks for help. Stephane FROMHOLTZ
2023 Apr 17
1
[PATCH v3] drm/nouveau: fix incorrect conversion to dma_resv_wait_timeout()
Am 15.04.23 um 04:02 schrieb John Ogness: > Commit 41d351f29528 ("drm/nouveau: stop using ttm_bo_wait") > converted from ttm_bo_wait_ctx() to dma_resv_wait_timeout(). > However, dma_resv_wait_timeout() returns greater than zero on > success as opposed to ttm_bo_wait_ctx(). As a result, relocs > will fail and log errors even when it was a success. > > Change the
2023 Apr 15
2
[PATCH v2] drm/nouveau: fix incorrect conversion to dma_resv_wait_timeout()
Commit 41d351f29528 ("drm/nouveau: stop using ttm_bo_wait") converted from ttm_bo_wait_ctx() to dma_resv_wait_timeout(). However, dma_resv_wait_timeout() returns greater than zero on success as opposed to ttm_bo_wait_ctx(). As a result, relocs will fail and log errors even when it was a success. Change the return code handling to match that of nouveau_gem_ioctl_cpu_prep(), which was
1999 Sep 20
1
Password change from Win95 clients
----- Original Message ----- From: samba <samba@druid.beeline.msk.ru> To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM <samba-ntdom@samba.org> Sent: Monday, 20 September, 1999 16:22 Subject: Password change from Win95 clients > Hello! > I'm using samba-2.0.5a on RedHat-6.0 in school network. There are so many > curious kids :) The network is dedicated for teachers only but
2005 Jul 03
1
bin/58951: Some problems with 4.9-RELEASE installation using comconsole
Hi! Is there anyone interested in fixing 4.x-RELEASE serial console installation? Eugene _______________________________________________ freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH 4/21] i386 Broken bios common
Both the APM BIOS and PnP BIOS code use a segment hack to simulate real mode selector 0x40 (which points to the BIOS data area at 0x00400 in real mode). Several broken BIOSen use selector 0x40 as if they were running in real mode, which we make work by faking up selector 0x40 in the GDT to point to physical memory starting at 0x400. We limit the access to the remainder of this physical page
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH 4/21] i386 Broken bios common
Both the APM BIOS and PnP BIOS code use a segment hack to simulate real mode selector 0x40 (which points to the BIOS data area at 0x00400 in real mode). Several broken BIOSen use selector 0x40 as if they were running in real mode, which we make work by faking up selector 0x40 in the GDT to point to physical memory starting at 0x400. We limit the access to the remainder of this physical page
2006 Apr 19
4
Wine 0.9.12: Fontprobleme
-- This e-mail was scanned with a private, non-commercial version of AntiVir MailGate. See http://www.antivir.de for details. -- This e-mail was scanned with a private, non-commercial version of AntiVir MailGate. See http://www.antivir.de for details. -------------- next part -------------- Skipped content of type multipart/signed
2004 Jun 08
0
Routing - new table
Hello, I have tested a simple thing in two version of Linux and there was a problem when I have used fwmark as a selector for rule lookups. As you can see below on the Slack, the <test> table doesn''t have any label about fwmark. Is there an iproute problem? -------------------------------------- # cat /etc/fedora-release Fedora Core release 2 (Tettnang) # uname -r 2.6.5-1.358 #
2006 Dec 11
1
dovecot disconnect(s) / new facts
Hi, I just tried the below with the current version 1.0 RC15 (from the dovecot website) and I still got the Problem: telnet gives me the following output: -----8<-----8<-----8<-----SNIP-----8<-----8<-----8<----- +OK dovecot ready.u-ERR invalid command u s-ERR invalid command s e-ERR invalid command e r-ERR invalid command r -ERR invalid command u-ERR invalid command u s-ERR
2011 Aug 10
2
Re: ntdll.dll.so: invalid ELF header
Good day, i've got a problem with antivir, probably someone knows: error (211): program file of AntiVir has been modified". I wonder if prelink is affecting it?
2006 Dec 11
1
Disconnects with proxies / new facts
Hi, I just tried the below with the current version 1.0 RC15 and I still got the Problem: telnet gives me the following output: -----8<-----8<-----8<-----SNIP-----8<-----8<-----8<----- +OK dovecot ready.u-ERR invalid command u s-ERR invalid command s e-ERR invalid command e r-ERR invalid command r -ERR invalid command u-ERR invalid command u s-ERR invalid command s e-ERR
2006 Dec 06
1
Disconnects with proxies
Hi, I know I shouldn't ask stuff like this when using dovecot-0.99.11-4.EL4 (CentOS-4.4), but why I'm asking this is whether it's worth to switch from rpm based upstream dovecot to a self compiled one or not and thus I think you wouldn't kill me presenting you this question. o:-) I've got a problem with dovecot regarding a pop3 proxy issue. When I configure my dovecot server
2006 Dec 05
0
dovecot disconnect(s)
Hi, I've got a problem with dovecot regarding a pop3 proxy issue. When I configure a dovecot server to do just plain pop3 I can telnet from a windows box without any flaw, but as soon as the client uses some pop3 proxy (for example outlook uses avira antivir Mail-AntiVirus Protection), queries to that server fail. A log line looks like this: pop3-login: Dec 05 22:53:24 Info: Disconnected
2011 Sep 06
0
Re: ntdll.dll.so: invalid ELF header
dimesio wrote: > > Blowbrown4 wrote: > > Good day, i've got a problem with antivir, probably someone knows: > > error (211): program file of AntiVir has been modified". > > I wonder if prelink is affecting it? > > What does this have to do with Wine? That is what I don`t get here also [Rolling Eyes]