similar to: ISOLINUX d'ont boot when to many file are put on cd

Yes, you are missing these options in the DHCP server: 66 'Boot Server Host Name' (the tftp server IP) 67 'Bootfile Name' (pxelinux.0) -----Original Message----- From: Pierre VIALLET [mailto:pvt at auvitran.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:18 AM To: syslinux at zytor.com Subject: [syslinux] PXE boot from Windows XP Hi, I want to boot a VIA EPIA Motherboard from a

Hi, we are the developers of an alternative to mkisofs: program xorriso from libburnia-project.org . The current development cycle is about support for creating bootable CDs, DVDs, BDs. So we look for testers and for advise about ISOLINUX specifics. The example from the ISOLINUX wiki is supposed to work if you replace "mkisofs" by "xorriso -as mkisofs". I.e: xorriso -as

Hi, > makehybrid \ > -o isos/muaaa.iso temp/ \ > -eltorito-boot temp/isolinux/isolinux.bin \ > -no-emul-boot \ > -iso -joliet -boot-load-size 4 \ > -default-volume-name "Custom Installer" \ > -eltorito-platform temp/isolinux/boot.cat > ... > [at boot time:] > Image checksum error, sorry I guess it is the Boot Information Table feature

Hi all, I am at the end of my wits, after a day and a half of mucking around with this :) My intention was to take a multi-boot DVD - of the style you get with an MSDN subscription - and burn an individual installer to disc. How to do this? My theory was to take the files for the installation CD, add isolinux, add a bootsector, and away I go. Unfortunately it doesn't seem this easy. So I

Hi, Didier Spaier wrote: > http://slint.fr/testing/slint64-14.1_syslinux.6.03/slint64-14.1_syslinux.6.03.img This looks like the content of an EFI system partition. Exactly what i need for experiments. Thanks a lot. (slint64-current-goofiboot.iso and slint64-current-efi-stub.iso were already in my collection.) It boots to "Slint installer for Slackware64-14.1" by:

H, Ady wrote: > A_ The default checksum included in the tested isolinux.bin (offset 20, > 4-bytes-long) is the "correct" one (as oppose to the current situation, > since version 4.00). That's good news. > F_ In the tested isolinux.bin file, there are two additional bytes that > I found to be changed/affected by some ISO-building tools (e.g. > mkisofs), at

Hello Thomas, Thomas Schmitt via Syslinux said on Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 04:35:57PM +0100: >I assume you can boot Fedora Live CD on the same (virtual) hardware. Not sure for Fedora, but the system is installed with either RHEL6, RHEL7 or Ubuntu 14.04 depending on the Lab I'm making on it without issue. >Just to make sure that the firmware works so far. Globally they do ;-) >

Hi, Pascal wrote: > mkisofs -o core.iso -b boot/core.img -c boot/boot.cat -hard-disk-boot core/ > my iso image is ok with qemu on bios and uefi, Astounding. As CD-ROM this is not supposed to work with UEFI unless the firmware emulates BIOS. What particular UEFI firmware did you use ? > and with qemu as hard disk on uefi but not on bios. That's even more astounding. The UEFI

Le mercredi 21 d?cembre 2016, Ady Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> a ?crit : > > > Hi, > > > > Pascal wrote: > > > mkisofs -o core.iso -b boot/core.img -c boot/boot.cat -hard-disk-boot > core/ > > > my iso image is ok with qemu on bios and uefi, > > > > Astounding. As CD-ROM this is not supposed to work with UEFI unless the >

> Hi, > > Pascal wrote: > > mkisofs -o core.iso -b boot/core.img -c boot/boot.cat -hard-disk-boot core/ > > my iso image is ok with qemu on bios and uefi, > > Astounding. As CD-ROM this is not supposed to work with UEFI unless the > firmware emulates BIOS. What particular UEFI firmware did you use ? > > > and with qemu as hard disk on uefi but not on

Hi, i am experiencing strange boot failures after repacking the ISO image archlinux-2013.11.01-dual.iso without isohybrid and EFI: # mount -o loop archlinux-2013.11.01-dual.iso /mnt $ xorriso -as mkisofs \ -o arch_repacked.iso \ -c isolinux/boot.cat \ -b isolinux/isolinux.bin \ -no-emul-boot -boot-load-size 4 -boot-info-table \ -V "ARCH_201311" \

> Hi, > > > I don't understand why you say "*But* the El Torito...". I don't see > > a difference with what the mkisofs manual says. > > The manual announces "Mac" for Apple Mac. > The program obviously writes Platform Id 1 in this case. > The El Torito specs say "Platform ID 0 = 80x86 1=Power PC 2=Mac". > In the sum this

Hi, > Unfortunately I get the error message: > isohybrid: slint64-14.1.iso: unable to find mac efi image This is probably due to El Torito Platform id "Mac" in -eltorito-alt-boot -no-emul-boot -eltorito-platform Mac \ -eltorito-boot isolinux/macboot.img \ This caused in the image http://slint.fr/misc/MacBoot/slint64-14.1.iso platform id 1 with the third image. (I would

Hello! El Torito & isolinux test with qemu - 3.06 boots, BUT windows boot files can't be loaded. ISOLINUX 3.06 2005-01-10 isolinux: Image checksum error, sorry... Boot failed: Press a key to retry... - 3.07 boots and starts windows boot files in the second run. The first one gives: isolinux: Disk error 0C, AX = 4204, drive E0 - 3.08 boots und starts windows boot files in

> Hi, > > i think i found a suspect in lzo/prepcore.c and it would indeed be a > wrong range of checksumming (speculative congratulations to Ady). Thank you Thomas for your replies and for looking into this issue. My part on the initial investigation that triggered this email thread is relatively small. Others deserve much more credit. I was/am providing not just my own report,

> Hi, > > > Unfortunately I get the error message: > > isohybrid: slint64-14.1.iso: unable to find mac efi image > > This is probably due to El Torito Platform id "Mac" in > > -eltorito-alt-boot -no-emul-boot -eltorito-platform Mac \ > -eltorito-boot isolinux/macboot.img \ > > This caused in the image >

Hi, i think i found a suspect in lzo/prepcore.c and it would indeed be a wrong range of checksumming (speculative congratulations to Ady). Looking at http://repo.or.cz/syslinux.git/blob/0d82b71304d596d80f3c4520f9dcf90048ca50b7:/lzo/prepcore.c it seems that this change in line 374 could yield correct checksums: unsigned int ptr; - for (ptr = 64; ptr < offset; ptr += 4) +

Hi, > I don't understand why you say "*But* the El Torito...". I don't see > a difference with what the mkisofs manual says. The manual announces "Mac" for Apple Mac. The program obviously writes Platform Id 1 in this case. The El Torito specs say "Platform ID 0 = 80x86 1=Power PC 2=Mac". In the sum this does not match. A bug in mkisofs would be the

2016-12-23 9:20 GMT+01:00 Thomas Schmitt via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com>: > Hi, > > Ady wrote: > > the UEFI specs do state that the ESP is supposed > > to be set/used as no-emulation mode > > ... > > the UEFI specs should tolerate / accept this situation, rather than > < restricting the ESP to no-emulation mode. > > My criticism towards this

> Hi, > > Ady wrote: > > cdrtools.sourceforge.net/private/man/cdrtools-3.01axx/mkisofs.8.html > > Mac Boot entries for the Apple Mac platform. > > Interesting feature. But the El Torito specs of Phoenix and > IBM of 1994 state that "Mac" would be Platform Id 2. > http://download.intel.com/support/motherboards/desktop/sb/specscdrom.pdf > Page