similar to: Having problems with PXELINUX parsing contents of pxelinux.cfg/AC134D6D

Hello, Does PXELINUX support tftp BLOCK-SIZE option? If so, what would be the maximum BLOCK-SIZE that can be used for the transfer? The RFC says that the range can be [8 - 65536]. Thanks, Sowmya

Hi Peter, (at least I hope it is you, who gets this mail) I have a problem while booting over the netwoork using PXELINUX. When I use a initrd smaller or equal 16 MB, everything works fine, but when I increase the size, the system doesn't boot. In case of a 32 MB initrd (same content, just bigger), I get the error-message, that the system couldn't mount root. From 64 MB on, the system

Hi, I am relatively new to xen and have the following question: Can a domain be live migrated to a different domain on the same system? Eg: if i have a domain VM1 and i want to migrate it and run it as VM2. Thanks, Sowmya _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi, 1) From the code it appears that there is no common entry/exit point for the hypervisor calls. Wanted to confirm if this is right? 2) Also is there a per-domain flag to indicate that the hypervisor call is in progress in a particular domain? Thanks, Sowmya _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com

Hello, I was getting the following error in syslog: libvirtd: 21:19:12.116: 10955: error : qemudDispatchServer:1355 : Too many active clients (20), dropping connection from 127.0.0.1;0 I investigated a bit and tried the following in a python console: import libvirt ~~~~ conn=libvirt.openReadOnly("qemu+ssh://HOST_IP/system<http://10.16.71.1/system> ") //now check the no. of

I have been trying to successfully join a Windows 2008 AD server using net ads join createcomputer="<OUname>" -U <usename>%password? for days and have been unsuccessful.? smb.conf and krb5.conf files are below.? It fails with a message "Cannot contact any KDC for requested realm".? I have checked all the service records via dig +short _ldap._tcp.mydomain.com

Hi, the docs for InstVisitor say that if RetType != void, one has to override visitInstruction. What is the reason for that? It's valid to define visitInstruction like that: RetTy visitInstruction(Instruction &I) { return RetTy(); } so assuming RetTy has a sensible default constructor, user won't need to override visitInstruction. Note that the above will work when RetTy ==

Hello Pedro, As others have said we're assuming that you're using Clang as the frontend, the MSP430TargetInfo class inside lib/Basic/Targets.cpp (clang codebase) set ints to be 16 bits wide, so you should get 16bit mults straight away without promotion. But anyways for 8bit multiplicantions you can do the following to bypass argument promotion: 1) go to the lib/CodeGen/TargetInfo.cpp

Hi, Inserting a call instruction is a bit of a pain. The only way I know how to do it is to write a bunch of code like the following: std::vector<const Type*> formalArgs; formalArgs.push_back(arg1->getType()); formalArgs.push_back(arg2->getType()); ... formalArgs.push_back(argn->getType()); std::vector<Value*> args; args.push_back(arg1);

Hi LLVM-ers, I am trying to get a return type of a function(from bitcode file) with LLVM-C API, but there seems no appropriate API to do that. I've tried to do that with following code, ---- LLVMModuleRef M; LLVMMemoryBufferRef MemBuf; LLVMValueRef F; // Function LLVMTypeRef RetTy; char *ErrStr; // // -- Load shader module //

Hi, I am writing an R package with two functions in C++. So far everything works. Now, i would like to write a third function which would use a pointer (it is a pointer to a class object) created by first function. I tried placing this pointer outside of the function definitions (i.e to make it global) but when called in the 3rd function i get > *** caught bus error *** address 0x0,

Hi, I am writing an R package with two functions in C++. So far everything works. Now, i would like to write a third function which would use a pointer (it is a pointer to a class object) created by first function. I tried placing this pointer outside of the function definitions (i.e to make it global) but when called in the 3rd function i get > *** caught bus error *** address 0x0,

I'm now writing a pass and I wanna ask a question about how to duplicate the function and add duplicated arguments in llvm, for example: func(int a, char *b) -> func(int a, char *b, int a1, char *b1) I'm now stuck at using "getOrInsertFunction" and how to handle "getArgumentList", please share your opinion, thanks a lot! James

Dear All I'm making an instrumentation pass. The pass is supposed to modify the given IR in a specefic way. One of the required modifications is to insert a call to a function at a specific location. This is the signature of the called function: void myclass::foo(Function *f, BasicBlock* b) This function's prototype is in an foofile.h file in include/llvm And the function

Hi all, Sorry for the inconvenient about the previous post. The files were not attached. So I put them here again. I am a newbie in LLVM and I am trying to replace the function like: old function || new function ============================== ========= int haha(int a) { int haha(int a, char* ID) { ===> }

I'm getting some problems because it seems that the compiler is treating "floor" differently from other math library functions like "sin". The Args and RetVal have the parameter and return types marked as void. For mips16, it's important that I be able to know the original signature for floating point functions. In some cases, need to create calls to helper

The patch is against revision 42247. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: tailcall-src.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 62639 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20070923/4770302f/attachment.obj>

On 24 Sep 2007, at 09:18, Evan Cheng wrote: > +; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=x86 -mattr=+sse2 -stats -info- > output-file - | grep asm-printer | grep 9 > +; change preceeding line form ... | grep 8 to ..| grep 9 since > +; with new fastcc has std call semantics causing a stack adjustment > +; after the function call > > Not sure if I understand this. Can you illustrate

All, The attached patch adds two extra arguments to TargetLowering::LowerCall: RetTy and Args. These arguments are used in TargetLowering::LowerCallTo() to construct the Ins and OutVals parameters, but are not available to the target via LowerCall(). Some targets require this additional information, and the LowerCallTo() method is not virtual in TargetLowering. Instead of making that method

Hi Arnold, This is a very good first step! Thanks! Comments below. Evan Index: test/CodeGen/X86/constant-pool-remat-0.ll =================================================================== --- test/CodeGen/X86/constant-pool-remat-0.ll (revision 42247) +++ test/CodeGen/X86/constant-pool-remat-0.ll (working copy) @@ -1,8 +1,10 @@ ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=x86-64 | grep LCPI | count 3 ;