similar to: ISC DHCPD Problem and Solution.

A long time, this apeared on the list: > Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 08:17:26 -0700 > From: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> > To: Gal Goldschmidt <gal at cs.haifa.ac.il> > Cc: syslinux at zytor.com > Subject: Re: [syslinux] ISC DHCPD Problem and Solution. > > Gal Goldschmidt wrote: > > > > All the station in that group suddenly did not receive the net

This was sent to the list as HTML (PLEASE, everyone, NO HTML!) This seems like an elegant replacement since "append" is not supported anymore, it seems... (sigh) -hpa -------- Original Message -------- Subject: dhcp-parameter-request-list and append in ISC DHCP 3.x Resent-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 17:04:07 -0800 Resent-From: syslinux-admin at zytor.com Resent-To: syslinux-owner at

I was just trying to setup pxelinux with the ISC DHCP server v 3.0.1pl9 using the instructions on the web site to get pxelinux to use a config file linked to a MAC address rather than an IP address and appear to have run into the same problem that Gal Goldschmidt posted about in this list back in July of 2002. It seems that the append statement is only applicable to the dhclient.conf file, not

Does anyone remember if there is a way to coerce the ISC DHCPD version 2 (2.0pl5) to send options to a PXE client that does not explicitly request them. I can do this in version 3 of DHCPD via the vendor-option-space mechanism, but this is not available in version 2 of the server (the version my network switch uses). I want to be able to specify the PXE filename via option 209 (plus option 208

Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: > > The dhcpd.conf examples in the wiki page were modified from "nn:nn" to > "decimal" format by HPA in 2016 (quoting HPA: "UEFI - clean up > dhcpd.conf examples"). > > Please note that several other sites (e.g. the FOG wiki) also use > simple decimal notation for these types of examples. Whether the > decimal

Has anyone had good luck serving dhcp addresses to Vista clients that work reliably? I have a test system and I can't seem to find out how to properly get dhcpd to always respond with broadcast instead of unicast since Vista won't honor unicast dhcp packets. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!! --------------

> Dear gentlemen, > > here goes the documentation fix I was talking about :-) > > The Wiki page on PXElinux, specifically the chapter on UEFI at the end > of that page: > https://wiki.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php?title=PXELINUX#UEFI > ...contains a few examples of ISC DHCPd configuration. > > The stumbling block for me was the syntax of these "if"

Hello all, I have set up a samba4 server with bind9 and the bind_dlz module. Everything is working as it should but now I need to allow the dhcp server to add entries to the forwarding zone. Has anybody implemented such a configuration ? Can this be done with the kerberos DNS dynamic update configuration. I want to achieve the following: 1) allow non-Windows machines (printers, ILO ...) to be

On 8 Nov 2019 at 0:42, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: > [in response to my = Frank Rysanek's rantings a few hours earlier:] > > if option architecture-type = 00:09 { > > filename "path/to/EFIx64/syslinux.efi"; > > } ... > > if substring (option vendor-class-identifier, 15, 5) = "00007" { > > filename

Dear gentlemen, here goes the documentation fix I was talking about :-) The Wiki page on PXElinux, specifically the chapter on UEFI at the end of that page: https://wiki.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php?title=PXELINUX#UEFI ...contains a few examples of ISC DHCPd configuration. The stumbling block for me was the syntax of these "if" scopes: if option architecture-type = 9 { filename

Hello, I try to set up a AD with bind9 and isc-dhcp-Server for dynamic DNS-updates. I followd the wiki: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_DHCP_to_update_DNS_records_wi th_BIND9 But I have this error: Oct 7 12:17:36 samba467 dhcpd: execute_statement argv[0] = /etc/dhcp/bin/dhcp-dyndns.sh Oct 7 12:17:36 samba467 dhcpd: execute_statement argv[1] = add Oct 7 12:17:36 samba467 dhcpd:

Hello Rolawnd, I followed the wikipage exactly. Bind9 is installed on the Samba DC. The Linux-Client should be a member of the Active Directory-domain? Regards ----- Mensaje original ----- De: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Para: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Enviados: Sábado, 7 de Octubre 2017 13:29:43 Asunto: Re: [Samba] bind9 and isc-dhcp-Server for

On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 22:02:42 +0200 Stefan Kania via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello List, Hello Rowland :-) > again I'm having problems with the DDNS. I did it as shown in the > wiki. I took all teh scripts from the wiki the dhcp-dyndns.sh is > Version: 0.8.9 I configured everything including the failover. When I > start the two DHCP-Server everything is

Hi Rowland, I resolve the problem partially. The problem was due to the fact that I do not have winbind installed because Samba 4, Bind9 and isc-dhcp-server are on the same server. I commented on these lines in the script dhcp-dyndns.sh and it worked (on commit and on release but not on expiry ) #TESTUSER=$(wbinfo -u | grep dhcpduser) #if [ -z "${TESTUSER}" ]; then # echo "No

Anybody have any experience with setting up dhcpd in failover mode between two servers? I set this up on a couple of servers, and it seems to be working, but I don't think it is working "right". It appears both servers are replying to all requests (which for renewals works okay because they both give the same address, but new requests get two different responses). I thought that

On 14 Jan 2017 8:01 pm, "Gregory P. Ennis" <PoMec at pomec.net> wrote: Everyone, I am trying to set up a second internal network (192.168.0.0/24) and have not been able to get dhcp to start when I have the following in my dhcpd.conf file : subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { range 192.168.0.110 192.168.0.130; option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;

VLANs are your friend, otherwise DHCPD is not going to understand how to properly answer your request for different networks on the same interface. ----- On 14 Jan, 2017, at 11:59, Gregory P. Ennis PoMec at PoMec.net wrote: | Everyone, | | I am trying to set up a second internal network (192.168.0.0/24) and | have not been able to get dhcp to start when I have the following in my | dhcpd.conf

On Sat, 7 Oct 2017 17:51:27 -0400 (CDT) Siovel Rodríguez Morales <siovel at softel.cu> wrote: > This is my named.conf > options { > directory "/var/cache/bind"; > notify no; > empty-zones-enable no; > auth-nxdomain yes; > listen-on-v6 { none; }; > forwarders {

Everyone, I am trying to set up a second internal network (192.168.0.0/24) and have not been able to get dhcp to start when I have the following in my dhcpd.conf file : subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { range 192.168.0.110 192.168.0.130; option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0; option broadcast-address 192.168.0.255; option routers 192.168.0.1; option

Sorry about the HTML in the last email - I'm attempting to resend (with fingers crossed that my mailer doesn't throw in a bunch of HTML this time...) ----> I've taken the good suggestions and made some progress getting a bind-dhcp-samba server running on the Pi with Raspbian Buster. Rowland wrote: > The best way would be to find whatever is rewriting /etc/resolv.conf >