similar to: Hangs on memdisk too.

I have released SYSLINUX 1.71 after fixing the total "brown-paper-bag" class bug in 1.70. My best guess is that I checked in the wrong verson of some code. -hpa SYSLINUX 1.70 doesn't introduce any new features, but contains a major rewrite of some of the internals. It also includes some bug fixes. SYSLINUX 1.71 is a bug fix to 1.70. Changes in 1.71: * Fix a

An update to the problem I reported earlier - A kind list reader, Michael K Ter Louw, suggested I try syslinux v1.67, and viola!, my problem went away completely. So something between 1.67 and 1.71 got broke with respect to isolinux. Hmm... Another kind list reader, Seth Kurtzberg, was kind enough to make and effort to send an updated initrd; although it didn't solve the problem, it was

Hi, I was looking through isolinux and noticed you had trouble detecting 8086 cpu's. I have some experience with this so I thought you might like some different info. The behavior of the "push sp" instruction changed after the 8086 to pushing sp before updating it. I've included a snippet of one of my bootstraps in case you want to use it (or just want to understand better).

change from v2: no code change, fix typos, update some comments change from v1: a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted skip mahcine type check on ppc, and add config. remove dedicated macro. add one patch to drop overload of rwsem_spin_on_owner and mutex_spin_on_owner. add more comments thanks boqun and Peter's suggestion. This patch set aims to fix lock holder preemption

change from v2: no code change, fix typos, update some comments change from v1: a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted skip mahcine type check on ppc, and add config. remove dedicated macro. add one patch to drop overload of rwsem_spin_on_owner and mutex_spin_on_owner. add more comments thanks boqun and Peter's suggestion. This patch set aims to fix lock holder preemption

Hi all, This is my first official post as RoR developer, so here it is. I''ve got a partial for a Address (Postcode, Address, City, ...). I want to use this partial multiple times on the same form? So I want to fill in multiple addresses and insert them individualy. How do I go about doing this? Kind Regards, Eugene Louw -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Good day Gert Hulselmans, You had reported to me at one point that MEMDISK -> .ISO -> ISOLINUX had failed under certain circumstances. I just noticed with a MEMDISK 3.86 that specifying the "iso" option on the command-line actually resulted in the .ISO getting BIOS drive number 0xFF. I had to specify "iso harddisk=224 pause" to confirm that it resulted in 0xE0 (hd96).

On 07/06/2016 02:52 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:43:07AM -0400, Pan Xinhui wrote: >> change fomr v1: >> a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted >> skip mahcine type check on ppc, and add config. remove dedicated macro. >> add one patch to drop overload of rwsem_spin_on_owner and mutex_spin_on_owner. >> add more comments

On 07/06/2016 02:52 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:43:07AM -0400, Pan Xinhui wrote: >> change fomr v1: >> a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted >> skip mahcine type check on ppc, and add config. remove dedicated macro. >> add one patch to drop overload of rwsem_spin_on_owner and mutex_spin_on_owner. >> add more comments

On 06/07/2016 08:52, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:43:07AM -0400, Pan Xinhui wrote: >> change fomr v1: >> a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted >> skip mahcine type check on ppc, and add config. remove dedicated macro. >> add one patch to drop overload of rwsem_spin_on_owner and mutex_spin_on_owner. >> add more comments

On 06/07/2016 08:52, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:43:07AM -0400, Pan Xinhui wrote: >> change fomr v1: >> a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted >> skip mahcine type check on ppc, and add config. remove dedicated macro. >> add one patch to drop overload of rwsem_spin_on_owner and mutex_spin_on_owner. >> add more comments

Hi David, I love your patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on next-20200909] [cannot apply to mmotm/master hnaz-linux-mm/master xen-tip/linux-next powerpc/next linus/master v5.9-rc4 v5.9-rc3 v5.9-rc2 v5.9-rc4] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in

change fomr v1: a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted skip mahcine type check on ppc, and add config. remove dedicated macro. add one patch to drop overload of rwsem_spin_on_owner and mutex_spin_on_owner. add more comments thanks boqun and Peter's suggestion. This patch set aims to fix lock holder preemption issues. test-case: perf record -a perf bench sched messaging -g

change fomr v1: a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted skip mahcine type check on ppc, and add config. remove dedicated macro. add one patch to drop overload of rwsem_spin_on_owner and mutex_spin_on_owner. add more comments thanks boqun and Peter's suggestion. This patch set aims to fix lock holder preemption issues. test-case: perf record -a perf bench sched messaging -g

On 06/07/2016 14:08, Wanpeng Li wrote: > 2016-07-06 18:44 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com>: >> >> >> On 06/07/2016 08:52, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:43:07AM -0400, Pan Xinhui wrote: >>>> change fomr v1: >>>> a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted >>>> skip mahcine

On 06/07/2016 14:08, Wanpeng Li wrote: > 2016-07-06 18:44 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com>: >> >> >> On 06/07/2016 08:52, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:43:07AM -0400, Pan Xinhui wrote: >>>> change fomr v1: >>>> a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted >>>> skip mahcine

Precis: I?m trying to debug a problem with CentOS7 failing to install from an ISO written to a USB pendrive ? anyone got suggestions? What works ? installing on a modern, ?standard PC?; the pendrive image boots and installs as I expect What does not work ? same pendrive booting in an ATCA blade. What I?ve tried is? 1. Boot the standard CentOS7 minimal image. This seems to start but then

Hello all, I am trying to replace grub with extlinux without any luck. I did remove the grub from my root Partition and boot from a LiveCD. I install syslinux and did those steps Boot Partition: mkdir -pv /mnt/sda1 mke2fs -jv /dev/hda1 mkfs -t ext3 /dev/hda1 mount /dev/hda1 /mnt/sda1 Root Partition export SDB1=/mnt/sdb1 mkdir -pv $SDB1

>I have just checked it, the startup.elf and realmode.elf are fine. Only few changes are required for mainline kernel and one >commit has to be reverted from lld and a few patches have to be applied. > >The only step when I have used BFD is linking vmlinux. I have manually set LD variable in vmlinux_link() function. The vmlinux >produced by lld doesn't work yet. I will compare

Hello, I've recently started working on compiling UML with LLVM: the goal is to produce a bitcode version of vmlinux. With some tweaks to the build process, I can use: make ARCH=um CROSS_COMPILE=llvm- CFLAGS="-emit-llvm" to produce vmlinux bitcode. The question is with respect linker script support. Since llvm-ld does not support linker scripts--please correct me if I'm