similar to: ASUS P4-TE

Hi! Facing a strange problem about not being able to access the floppy drive after booting from a rescue-floppy with 2.2.x kernel on an asus p4te mainboard, i searched the net and found a bug in the bootsector of the 2.2.x kernels. Before control is redirected to the kernel, the floppy drive is shut down in a way, that freezes the FD-Controller on recent mainboards (like the ASUS P4T-E). The

Hi guys, there was a topic crossposted to comp.lang.scheme and comp.lang.lisp (started 18 Dec 2004) about usability of LLVM for Scheme and Lisp. Schemers gave some replies. sorry for long link: http://groups.google.de/groups?start=25&hl=de&lr=&group=comp.lang.scheme&selm=pan.2004.12.18.11.29.33.33249%40consulting.net.nz if link is skewed for you, just use google's group

Hi there, I have a really ugly problem, which, as I know is partially selfmade. But to the problem: I have five servers running samba-2.2.3a-12 (latest Debian Woody release) which are controlled by one master server. All of the five servers act as pdc for an own nt-domain. Now to keep the administrative work as low as possible I have this one master server. Via this server we/our customer

Hello Does anyone know of any possible concerns in moving a "production" CentOS 4 install from one machine to another where the "only" difference is that the processor changes from a 1.8 Intel P4 "without" Hyper-Threading to a 3.0 Intel P4 "with" Hyper-Threading ? I am guessing not, yet I "have to" ask. Regards, - rh

Hi, I installed centos 4 on a P4, configured it (and it booted fine here) then sent it to the DC to be put in a P3 but it won't boot, displays GRUB and halts. The DC guys tried grub-install in rescue mode but still the same. Any clues? Is there some difference between P3 and P4? thanks tom

Dear community, We, a team at IIT Hyderabad are developing an LLVM front end for a networking language called P4 (https://p4.org/). Our work aims to enable LLVM based optimizations for P4. As the P4 language was designed to target many different switch architectures, we feel that P4 can comfortably fit in the LLVM framework where adding targets is more structured. The existing open-source P4

I have three different live-CD distributions that give me different numbers for the cpu count on this box (Dell P4 2.4GHz). -the Knoppix 3.3 (11-19-03) says 1 processor (no error); -the PHLAK 0.2 distribution say 1 processor (and 1 missing) -the Local Area Security distro says two processors (identicle P4s). Might there be somthing new in 2.0.8 that accounts for this difference. Is there a

>but if I disable hyperthreading (noht on the kernel line in lilo/grub) Could the same result could be obtained if hyperthreading is disabled from the BIOS ? Supermicro Motherboards (most Phoneix based) have this option Also, would we see same pops and clicks in a dual CPU box (Zeon) then ? SW Message: 1 Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 14:32:16 -0500 From: Jeremy McNamara <jj@nufone.net> To:

I have just had delivered a new HP Proliant server and it is based on an Intel Xeon 2.8GHz processor. On site already we have an Acer Altos G310 with a P4 2.8GHz processor. The new HP server was destined for another site with about 30 persons to service some simple file and print sharing and to manage their email (postfix + MailScanner). The Acer is hosting our Intranet, file and print sharing

2005/9/21, Cole, Ray <Ray_Cole@bmc.com>: > I saw something similar running Xen 2.0-testing on a machine with a P4. I''d been running on it just fine, but I decided to see how performance would be with and without hyperthreading enabled. So I went into the system setup and disabled hyperthreading. Domain 0 started booting and when it got to the point of starting my guest domains

I'm looking at deploying a new set of servers based around Intel P4 800MHZ FSB processors. Currently I'm looking at the following 2 motherboards and I'm wondering how well supported they are under -STABLE (specificaly the ATA and LAN as well as text mode video) Model Chipset ASUS P4P8X Intel 865P ASUS P4P800 Intel 865PE Also I'm looking for recommendations on Dual Xeon

I'm wondering if anyone has had any good/bad/indifferent experiences with Supermicro P4SGE P4 FCPGA motherboards and Digium cards? I'm looking to use this MB in an E100P E1 card solution, and I haven't had the ability to test with that configuration before I ship a system overseas (since I don't have an E1 to plug into it, it's hard for me to test, and I don't have

Hello, I read an interesting article on 2cpu.com that talks about the performance differences between a P4 processor with Hyperthreading(HT) enabled and disabled. http://www.2cpu.com/articles/ht_explored/index.html The bottom line of the article is that processor intensive applications greatly benefit from HT being enabled, but memory intensive applications can actually see a slight decrease in

Hi All, Please for some advice. I have Linux router that do traffic control with HTB , routing and traffic counting. currently machine is with P4 2.2GHZ 1GB RAM. I plan to migrate to dual core CPU. I know well P4 dual core but is it anybody has experience with AMD64 dual core / or single core / for traffic control . I use Deban Linux for my router. Can I expect problems with HTB and iproute 2

No, just no. You do not use goto to skip a code block. You do not return an obvious variable from a singly-inlined function and give the function a return value. You don't put unexplained comments about kmalloc in code which doesn't do dynamic allocation. And you don't leave stray warnings around for no good reason. Also, when possible, it is better to use block scoped variables

No, just no. You do not use goto to skip a code block. You do not return an obvious variable from a singly-inlined function and give the function a return value. You don't put unexplained comments about kmalloc in code which doesn't do dynamic allocation. And you don't leave stray warnings around for no good reason. Also, when possible, it is better to use block scoped variables

Hi all I am in the process of upgrading my XEN servers from 2.4 to 2.6 kernels as I am having better results on 2.6. However one machine (the big daddy) refuses to boot a 2.6.9 xenolinux kernel. It''s an IBM eSeries xServer x205. I have selected what i think are the appropriate options in menuconfig but it refuses to boot into dom0. By refuse I mean it initialises the hypervisor,

Ok, i tried the suggestion: Instead of: sippuser => resource, database_name, table_name sippeer => resource, database_name, table_name I put in: sippuser => resource, context, table_name sippeer => resource, context, table_name Unfortunately, with the same results. btw i tried both "general" as "default" Besids the commands i tried below, isn't there any

Sorry for being a bit of a newbie here but I find the docs or README for downloading the G.729 codec from Digium are not as detailed as I would like or just don't really break down the different versions to a point that I am clear on which one to grab. The choices for 32bit are: drwxr-xr-x 3 0 0 4096 Dec 05 00:21 athlon-xp drwxr-xr-x 3 0 0 4096 Dec

Hi I my smbd.log, I can find these lines. How to resolv this problem ? [2004/01/08 12:03:11, 5] lib/gencache.c:gencache_init(59) Opening cache file at /var/cache/samba/gencache.tdb [2004/01/08 12:03:11, 5] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(724) tdb(unnamed): tdb_brlock failed (fd=12) at offset 4 rw_type=1 lck_type=13: Ressource temporairement non disponible [2004/01/08 12:03:11, 5]