similar to: NSD reload

We upgraded to NSD 3.2.9 (from 3.2.8) because we encountered the problem "Fix denial of existence response for empty non-terminal that looks like a NSEC3-only domain (but has data below it)." (a nasty problem with DNSSEC). But we now have IXFR issues. On one name server, NSD 3.2.9 works fine, zones are IXFRed and work. On another name server, with much more zones (and big ones), we

Hi, I'm a sys admin and currently working for a french hosting company. We provide DNS services to our customers and at the moment we are using BIND on Debian servers. BIND is a good software but we don't need a recursing DNS for our public DNS, and we needed better security than what BIND provides. So I made the suggestion to replace BIND by another DNS software. NSD appears to be the

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/pipermail/nsd-users/attachments/20230222/50ca00eb/attachment.htm>

Hi all, we have discovered a segfault in nsd-patch when renaming slave zone in nsd config file if some data for this zone still exists in the IXFR diff database. In my case, the zone "black" was renamed to "blackinwhite": > root at ggd115:/cage/nsd/var/nsd/zones#nsd-patch -c > /cage/nsd/etc/nsd-dns-slave.conf > reading database > reading updates to database >

On NetBSD 6.99.28-CURRENT, nsd 3.2.16 works fine, however nsd 4.0.0 is spinning chewing CPU. The logs show: Nov 28 23:07:00 xxx nsd[466]: sendmmsg failed: Resource temporarily unavailable ktruss shows it getting EAGAIN from sendmmsg(2) over and over again. According to the man page: [EAGAIN|EWOULDBLOCK] The socket is marked non-blocking and the requested

Hi Jean Claude, The message is printed when the bind operation failed. Why that happens is hard to say, I'd need more information for that. As the message does not say: address already in use (or similar), I'm guessing the address is not configured? Best regards, Jeroen On Fri, 2023-04-21 at 18:03 +0200, HAKIZIMANA Jean Claude via nsd-users wrote: > Dear nsd Users, > kindly can

On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 17:02:09 +0100 richard lucassen via nsd-users <nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl> wrote: > The problem is (was) that I used "include:" statements in nsd.conf > to load zone information. Apparently nsd does not reread the include > files upon a SIGHUP. I scripted everything into 1 file and a HUP > rereads the zone info now. Wrong, I made a mistake it

Hi, NSD 4.8.0rc1 pre-release is available: https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/nsd-4.8.0rc1.tar.gz sha256 64f1da8f8163340f9d3b352ef8819e3c72c951fdd87cff55dc3b6a6b1ea27942 pgp https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/nsd-4.8.0rc1.tar.gz.asc This release introduces PROXYv2 support and faster statistics gathering, removes the database option and fixes bugs. The proxy protocol support is an implementation

Dear NSD users, Here is the release candidate for NSD 3.2.15. This comes with ILNP support, NSD-RRL and different TSIG initialization (it fails if it can't find no suitable algorithms, instead of can't find 'one of the'). Plus some bugfixes. The NSD-RRL implementation is based on the work by Vixie and Schryver. However, because of the code-diversity argument that is at the basis

People are proposing rate-limiting built into BIND, to defend against some DoS attackes (a proposal <http://fanf.livejournal.com/122111.html> and its implementation <https://github.com/fanf2/bind-9/blob/master/doc/misc/ratelimiting>). What is the current thinking for NSD? (It is a truly open question, do not take it as "this guy requires rate-limiting in NSD".)

Good morning, On Tue Apr 28 2009 at 10:34:24 CEST, Jelte Jansen wrote: > We are looking into it (if only because the question comes up about once a > week now) It's been a little more than a week since the question last turned up :) I'd also like to know if any progress has been made to allow NSD to have zones added/removed on the fly, somewhat along the lines of BIND's

Dear nsd Users, kindly can you help me to trace the cause of this error in nsd " nsd[25372]: warning: xfrd: could not bind source address:port to socket: Cannot assign requested address". I use NSD version 4.0.1 Thank you, -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

This release is an alpha release. We are currently not planning to have a 1.4.0 stable release as we want to prioritize implementing DNSSEC first. The next stable release will then be NSD 2.0.0 with DNSSEC support. This release has some major changes: the database format is much more compact, responses are generated on-the-fly instead of being precompiled in the database, and the new

NSD 2.3.2 is a bugfix release. Please see the README document for configuration and installation instructions. You can download NSD from http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/nsd/ Note: we switched to SHA-1 for tarball digest. 2.3.2 ============= FEATURES: - Bug #101: add support for the SPF record. BUG FIXES: - Bug #100: replaced non-portable use of timegm(3) with portable

Robert Blayzor via nsd-users writes: > > NSD doesn't understand the GENERATE directive. You'll have to create > > your zone files using a script or template engine. > Understood but certainly not helpful with large dynamic IPv6 PTR's... > Not that dynamic hosts NEED PTR's, but would still be nice to have. lex(1) is your friend. For managing our reverse ip6

Dear all, Could I use the tool "nsupdate" from the "dnsutils" package to update my zone/record in NSD ? http://docs.freebsd.org/doc/8.0-RELEASE/usr/share/doc/bind9/arm/man.nsupdate.html Thanks by advance.

Greetings, Unbound 1.4.20 OS X 10.8.4 - Server NSD 3.2.15 I have installed 'unbound' and it works nicely on my client (test purpose) - Client is MacBook Air. I have installed NSD (will be in replacement of BIND) on said client. All is good but when i try to start NSD Error --> nsd can't bind udp socket: address already in use. Everything is configured to bind to 127.0.0.1. #

Hello I have this problem since a week or so: The nsd daemon crashes unexpectedly and the nsd log files shows this: [1200299533] nsd[3736]: info: XSTATS 1200299533 1200298484 RR=0 RNXD=0 RFwdR=0 RDupR=0 RFail=0 RFErr=0 RErr=0 RAXFR=0 RLame=0 ROpts=0 SSysQ=0 SAns=40 SFwdQ=0 SDupQ=0 SErr=0 RQ=37 RIQ=0 RFwdQ=0 RDupQ=0 RTCP=0 SFwdR=0 SFail=30 SFErr=0 SNaAns=0 SNXD=0 RUQ=0 RURQ=0 RUXFR=0 RUUpd=1

On 3/20/23 13:41, Anand Buddhdev via nsd-users wrote: > Hi Robert, > > NSD doesn't understand the GENERATE directive. You'll have to create > your zone files using a script or template engine. Understood but certainly not helpful with large dynamic IPv6 PTR's... Not that dynamic hosts NEED PTR's, but would still be nice to have. -- inoc.net!rblayzor XMPP:

Hi NSD developers, I have been experimenting with the "store-ixfr" feature in NSD. I have a configuration with: server: zonefiles-write: 0 pattern: store-ixfr: yes With this configuration, NSD transfers zones from a primary, and keeps them in RAM. When the zones are updated, it receives and stores the IXFR in RAM too. I can query NSD with the IXFR qtype, and it replies with