similar to: a few more notes

hi, after i test nsd i find the following. if i use this in a zone file: $ORIGIN example.com. CNAME www www CNAME x x A 1.2.3.4 then it's excepted by nsd what's more give the proper result. if the slave is nsd than there is no problem, while if the slave is bind i've got the following error:

We upgraded to NSD 3.2.9 (from 3.2.8) because we encountered the problem "Fix denial of existence response for empty non-terminal that looks like a NSEC3-only domain (but has data below it)." (a nasty problem with DNSSEC). But we now have IXFR issues. On one name server, NSD 3.2.9 works fine, zones are IXFRed and work. On another name server, with much more zones (and big ones), we

Dear authors of NSD, currently, the manpages that come with NSD are written in the traditional man(7) markup language. I am proposing to rewrite them into the semantic markup of the mdoc(7) language. I am willing to do the work. See a version of nsd-checkzone.8 below as an example. Both the man(7) and mdoc(7) languages have been around for decades, and are supported by the prevalent formatters:

Hi, I'm a sys admin and currently working for a french hosting company. We provide DNS services to our customers and at the moment we are using BIND on Debian servers. BIND is a good software but we don't need a recursing DNS for our public DNS, and we needed better security than what BIND provides. So I made the suggestion to replace BIND by another DNS software. NSD appears to be the

NSD 2.3.2 is a bugfix release. Please see the README document for configuration and installation instructions. You can download NSD from http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/nsd/ Note: we switched to SHA-1 for tarball digest. 2.3.2 ============= FEATURES: - Bug #101: add support for the SPF record. BUG FIXES: - Bug #100: replaced non-portable use of timegm(3) with portable

Hi, I have a query regarding running a manual update of nsd via: # nsdc update My NSD server is accepting notifications from two servers. From my nsd.conf: # master 1 allow-notify: X.X.X.X NOKEY request-xfr: AXFR X.X.X.X NOKEY # master 2 allow-notify: Y.Y.Y.Y NOKEY request-xfr: AXFR Y.Y.Y.Y NOKEY Are both servers sequentially queried each time

On 04/12/2023 13:47, Jean-Christophe Boggio via nsd-users wrote: Hi Jean-Christophe, > When syncing between master and slaves, am I supposed to see new files > appear in the slave's "zonesdir" directory? Because, as you might > expect, I see nothing here. Is this behavior normal? From what I > understand, the slave "caches" the data in /var/lib/nsd/nsd.db

Hi NSD developers, I have been experimenting with the "store-ixfr" feature in NSD. I have a configuration with: server: zonefiles-write: 0 pattern: store-ixfr: yes With this configuration, NSD transfers zones from a primary, and keeps them in RAM. When the zones are updated, it receives and stores the IXFR in RAM too. I can query NSD with the IXFR qtype, and it replies with

On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 17:02:09 +0100 richard lucassen via nsd-users <nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl> wrote: > The problem is (was) that I used "include:" statements in nsd.conf > to load zone information. Apparently nsd does not reread the include > files upon a SIGHUP. I scripted everything into 1 file and a HUP > rereads the zone info now. Wrong, I made a mistake it

Hi there! I remember reading that you cannot reload new zone files on the fly and require a full restart of the nsd daemon? We are evaluating multiple DNS servers that have better performance comparing to bind, but will require quite heavy zone reload (new and existing) every 10 minutes or so. Downtime (even 1-3 secs) is not the option. Thanks!

Hello, I am switching from djbdns and have a (probably dumb) question before going live with nsd: When syncing between master and slaves, am I supposed to see new files appear in the slave's "zonesdir" directory? Because, as you might expect, I see nothing here. Is this behavior normal? From what I understand, the slave "caches" the data in /var/lib/nsd/nsd.db

Hello, NSD 4.8.0 running on FreeBSD 13.2-RELEASE-p9 and serving both plain and DNSSEC signed zones. I noticed Permission denied errors in the logs for all domains listed in nsd.conf: [2024-01-12 12:20:05.710] nsd[8655]: info: writing zone domain-plain.org to file domain-plain.org [2024-01-12 12:20:05.710] nsd[8655]: error: cannot write zone domain-plain.org file domain-plain.org~: Permission

Hello! I use NSD 4.7.0 self compiled: Configure line: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr --includedir=${prefix}/include --mandir=${prefix}/share/man --infodir=${prefix}/share/info --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var --disable-option-checking --disable-silent-rules --libdir=${prefix}/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu --runstatedir=/run --disable-maintainer-mode --disable-dependency-tracking

Hi, I found a reproducible seg fault with a DNSSEC signed zone and overlapping config. I'm running NSD 4.10.1. Here's how to reproduce. 2 zones in nsd.conf: zone: name: "foo.com." zonefile: "/zones/foo.com.zone.signed" zone: name: "bar.foo.com." zonefile: "/zones/bar.foo.com.zone" Zone files:

Hi Chris, I'm having trouble trying to reproduce the issue locally. Like you I configure two zones. zone: name: example.com. zonefile: example.com.zone.signed zone: name: bar.example.com. zonefile: bar.example.com.zone The file bar.example.com.zone does not exist. After touching and reloading the signed zone, no segfault occurs. I've tried with and without the

Hi Jeroen, Attached is the zone I used. Did you add the record for a.bar ? Ex: a.bar 300 IN NS ns.somewhere.net. Chris ________________________________ From: Jeroen Koekkoek <jeroen at nlnetlabs.nl> Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2024 5:33 AM To: Chris LaVallee <clavallee at edg.io>; nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl <nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl> Subject: Re:

Hi Chris, I can reproduce with your zone. Thanks! Best, Jeroen On Tue, 2024-10-08 at 14:07 +0000, Chris LaVallee wrote: > > Hi Jeroen, > > > Attached is the zone I used. Did you add the record for a.bar ? > > > Ex: > > > a.bar ? 300 ? ? IN ?NS ? ? ?ns.somewhere.net. > > > Chris > > > > > > > > > > >

Hi Chris, I've properly started looking into this yesterday. NSD definitely shouldn't crash, still working on that. However, the provided zone is invalid too(?) I'm not the foremost expert on NSEC3 (or even DNSSEC), but is seems an NSEC3 is missing for bar.foo.com. Empty non-terminals should still have an NSEC3 RR. (Of course, the delegation point should be at bar.foo.com. too and

Hi list, We are observing strange behavior of nsd v3.2.9 acting as slave DNS server. The environment is set up as follows: 0. We are using 172.16.0.0/16 subnet; 1. Primary Master server at 172.16.100.114; 2. Slave server at 172.16.100.115. The config file is in /etc/nsd-dns-slave.conf; 3. There may be also other Master servers im the given subnet. Now I want to permit DNS NOTIFY messages to

Greetings, Unbound 1.4.20 OS X 10.8.4 - Server NSD 3.2.15 I have installed 'unbound' and it works nicely on my client (test purpose) - Client is MacBook Air. I have installed NSD (will be in replacement of BIND) on said client. All is good but when i try to start NSD Error --> nsd can't bind udp socket: address already in use. Everything is configured to bind to 127.0.0.1. #