similar to: few question

On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Luke Ledgerd <luke.ledgerd at niteco.se> wrote: > Gene, > > As it happened I started working on this again just as you mailed me. I saw it in IRC. > It appears that PXE-E99 may also be related to MTFTP part of the PXE spec. IBM also says it has something to do with jumbo frames. I tried setting PXE.mtcp-ip to 0.0.0.0 to disable it but still no

Gene, As it happened I started working on this again just as you mailed me. It appears that PXE-E99 may also be related to MTFTP part of the PXE spec. IBM also says it has something to do with jumbo frames. I tried setting PXE.mtcp-ip to 0.0.0.0 to disable it but still no joy. The bootfile size shows up as zero because that relates to "option boot-size" in dhcp and doesn't seem to

Hi, my client pc hangs on pxelinux before starting to fetch the linux kernel. It hangs after printing the ip information row. No traffic is observed at this point on the network. The pxelinux is transferred to the client through a tftp server and with no problems. What options do I have to proceed from this point and try to find out where the problem is? Thanks, Firas. -- Firas Swidan, PhD

Ady: You seem to be taking (copy$paste) parts and pieces from different resources. Luke: Nope. The configuration works fine with PXE 2.01 clients, it's the UEFI PXE 3.2 that is having issues with the dhcp requests. The gospel is the Intel PXE 3 spec I'm RTFMing now. No copy and paste, I just started with someone elses configuration file that claims to support UEFI - or at least hopes to

<snip > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text, especially the archives of mailing lists. Q: Why is Top-posting such a bad thing? I apologize in advance for the potentially-dumb comments/questions. _ Do you really need the Vendor Class Identifier option included in the "if option arch" conditions? _ Do you really need the Vendor Class Identifier

Hi, I was wondering if anyone had a good dhcpd.conf and /tftpboot files for a EPIA-M motherboard with RedHat 9.0.... Or maybe just a configuration that works with the EPIA-M (doesn't matter which type of linux). I'm trying to boot the system from the network and it seems to be getting to downloading pxelinux.0 but then nothing happens after that.... I'm using ISC dhcpd V3.0pl2,

> <snip > > > > Nope, I got desperate troubleshooting and searching the web for other > solutions. > Others were using just "PXEClient" which may have worked with legacy > boot but not EFI. > > > _ If you use Vendor Class Identifier, can you (or, are you allowed > > to) simultaneously choose a (boot)filename for each Client System > >

Gene, I found a document from IBM that explains why it didn't like Vendor-Class-Identifier option I was using "PXEClient" was causing EFI boot rooms to dummy spit, that's very useful, that combined with RTFMing the PXE specs 3.0-3.2 might solve my problem if I keep at it. http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21247032 Even the PXELinux docs suggest encapsulating

On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz at cmu.edu> wrote: > On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 05:49 -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: >> 1) Thinking about the responses again, I'm absolutely surprised that >> you can even boot PXELINUX. I would have expected the response from >> the Altiris server to override your attempts to block it. > > Nope. The PXE spec

Hello. In my case I can successfully boot up my Thinkpad X32, but the same configuration doesn't work for my desktop computer with Intel network card, with Intel Boot Agent 2.2 DHCP server is 10.0.0.1, tftpd (used tftp-hpa) runs on 10.0.0.32. netstat told me the daemon listen to 69 UDP port just fine. running tftp in commandline also shows it works (retrieve pxelinux.0 less then 1 second).

Sorry for top-posting but my webmail forces me to. I added -W to the APPEND line as suggested but I'm still getting the same result: Booting... Altiris, inc. X86PC PreBoot, PXE-2.x Enhanced Build ID=402 PXEPreZero: Invalid PXE Server list format. and the client PC freezes right there. Here's the full content of my dhcp.conf: max-lease-time 86400; ddns-update-style interim;

On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Vieri <rentorbuy at yahoo.com> wrote: > So I take it it's more of a DHCP hack in which: > 1- client boots and gets DHCP response from 10.215.144.7 with PXE syslinux info > 2- client loads pxelinux.0 menu and selects menu that chains to Altiris PXE menu except, instead of calling pxechain.com or pxechn.c32 with the Altiris server's IP address,

On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 13:18 -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: > Second, I notice the Altiris server specifies _3_ options of code 43, > including one of length 253. The pack/unpack _should_ handle this but > may split it differently. That's legal, and treated as if the values had been concatenated. See RFC2131, section 4.1, and particularly the second paragraph on page 24. Unfortunately, a

Hi, I have a Linux server at ip address 10.215.144.7 running DHCP, TFTP and syslinux. DHCP config contains the following: next-server 10.215.144.7; filename "/pxe/syslinux/pxelinux.0"; and the 'default' pxelinux.cfg contains: LABEL altiris ??? MENU LABEL ^7. Altiris ??? COM32 pxechn.c32 ??? APPEND 10.215.144.60::/BStrap/x86pc/BStrap.0 When a PXE client boots in my network

This is what I'm seeing on my DHCP server: # tcpdump -i eth0 -vvv -s 1500 '(port 67 or port 68)' tcpdump: listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 1500 bytes 13:24:05.679950 IP (tos 0x0, ttl? 20, id 0, offset 0, flags [none], proto: UDP (17), length: 576) 0.0.0.0.bootpc > 255.255.255.255.bootps: [udp sum ok] BOOTP/DHCP, Request from 00:24:54:d9:d4:2f (oui

Hello, i've found a strange bug, here is my situation: - all of our computers makes a pxeboot request by default dhcp server is configured: option option-128 code 128 = string; option option-129 code 129 = text; option space PXE; option PXE.mtftp-ip code 1 = ip-address; option PXE.mtftp-cport code 2 = unsigned integer 16; option PXE.mtftp-sport code 3 = unsigned

Hi there, ----- Original Message ----- From: koxudaxi at gmail.com To: syslinux at zytor.com Date: 01.04.2013 10:00:27 Subject: Re: [syslinux] Problem with pxelinux 5.0 and memtest > On 04/01/2013 09:28 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> On 03/31/2013 05:26 PM, Koudai Aono wrote: >>> I ran the test on a x86 emulator is called Oracle VirtualBox. >>> I think it might not be

Hi, I'm planning to get my Asterisk box out of the LAN, get rid of my router and make the box acts as a Router, Firewall, DHCP Server (with Shorewall). I'll do that to be able to use some SIP clients remotely. Does anyone doing the same with the Asterisk box, is it a good idea, is there any other solution for the SIP emote Clients. Regards. __________________________________

On 2014/3/7 ?? 05:23, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Bryan Romine <bromine1027 at gmail.com> wrote: >> Sorry for the confusion, I am actually using 6.02. It turns out that I was >> trying to use the 32-bit efi binary to load 64-bit kernels. I switched to >> using "syslinux64.efi" but it hangs during boot, just before loading the >>

Hi, I have refered to ur documents for creating a Diskless node in linux ,but could not get through the installation . The exact problem that i am facing is mention below , also, there r few queries, which i would be greatfull if u can answer First let me explain u what i have done . I am trying the configuration with one server machine and one client. server configuration 256mb ram AMD Athlon