similar to: [Fwd: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 Update 7 Availability Announcement]

Just in case there is one person on this list that isn't aware... and so it begins... Craig -------- Forwarded Message -------- > From: nahant-list at redhat.com > Reply-To: nahant-list at redhat.com > To: nahant-list at redhat.com > Subject: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Update 3 Availability Announcement > Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 19:32:51 -0500 > > Red Hat is pleased to

It's official -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Update 1 Availability Announcement Red Hat is pleased to announce the availability of Update 1 for the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 family of products, including: - Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS (v. 4) for x86, AMD64/EM64T, Itanium, POWER, S/390 and zSeries - Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES (v. 4) for

-- uklinux.net - The ISP of choice for the discerning Linux user. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:44:37 -0400 From: taroon-beta-list at redhat.com To: taroon-beta-list at redhat.com Subject: Announcing Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 (Nahant) Beta 1 Public Availability Red Hat is pleased to announce the availability of the Red Hat Enterprise Linux (version 4)

I've found a problem with CentOS 3 latest kernel (2.4.21-27.0.1.ELsmp) and megaraid2 driver. Hardware: Dell PE1600SC with CERC ATA100 RAID controller The problem is somewhat similar, but not identical as: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123289 After updating new glibc and kernel packages the new kernel don't boot. Boot fails to mount root fs with "Cannot open

Red Hat is pleased to announce the availability of Update 2 for the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 family of products, including: - Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS 4 for x86, AMD64/EM64T, Itanium, POWER, S/390 and zSeries - Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES 4 for x86, AMD64/EM64T, Itanium - Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS 4 for x86, AMD64/EM64T, Itanium - Red Hat Desktop 4 for x86 and AMD64/EM64T Craig

Hi, everyone. I'm new to the list. This question may have come up before, but I couldn't find an answer to it by searching the centos website. Could be I was using bad keywords for my search. I have 3 HP xw9300 workstations (dual AMD Opteron 64-bit processors) that I'm upgrading from RHEL3WS to CentOS 4.4. I've upgraded two already, with one left to go. On the system with

Hi, I am struggling to get rid of a conflict on DELL 2800 : PCI Parity error (EB113 on the display) I am learning linux and asterisk as I go along, there might be obvious things I should know, but bear with me. >From demsg below my 2 digium cards installed are listed (no config or connections done to digium cards yet), the conflict is with the TDM400P card, without that card, in any slot, no

Hi Guys Im trying to complile Asterisk on my new dual Xeon 3.0ghz EM64T machine. Im running Debian 3.1, and have installed the 2.6.8-11-em64t-p4-smp kernel (and headers). The system is working fine and is detecting both CPU's (4 actually, with hyperthreading). But when I try to compile Zaptel, Im getting this error: /lib/modules/2.6.8-11-em64t-p4-smp? /build make -C

Hi all, My Ct's box is RH 3.0 SMP kernel EM64T. They are asking if OCFS for SMP (EM64T) is available or not. In following site, we can not see OCFS for SMP (EM64T). http://oss.oracle.com/projects/ocfs/files/RedHat/RHEL3/x86_64/1.0.14-1/ ---------- ocfs-2.4.21-EL-1.0.14-1.ia32e.rpm OCFS driver for kernel version 2.4.21-27.EL and higher (EM64T) ocfs-2.4.21-EL-1.0.14-1.src.rpm OCFS driver

Dear developeRs, I'm trying to build R (2.7.1, on an x86_64 running Linux, but I believe I have observed this on x86 and with earlier versions of R as well) using external BLAS and LAPACK libraries _and_ generating libR.so, libRblas.so and libRlapack.so. Without --enable-BLAS-shlib, configure is able to find and use the external LAPACK library: ./configure \

http://www.redhat.com/f/pdf/rhel/WHP0006US_Execshield.pdf -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Whitepaper about the new security features in RHEL3 U3 Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:54:15 +0200 From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv at redhat.com> Reply-To: Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon) <taroon-list at redhat.com> To: taroon-list at redhat.com Hi, with the beta of

hi, it seems RH release a few dozens of updates in the last few days: (https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel3as-errata.html). when we can expect these fro centos? thanks in advance. yours. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

I am trying to install ArcServe 11 for Linux [root at linserv1 cdrom]# ./install Much license gibberish removed... ENTER NO (N) TO HALT THE INSTALLATION PROCESS. Please enter your choice:[Y|N] (default: N)Y Do you want to view the installation notes? (y/n):(default: y) N Cannot identify your Linux distribution or it is not yet supported. [root at linserv1 cdrom]# cat /etc/issue Red Hat

I have problems building R 2.11.1 with an external BLAS. I've tried several with several libraries: # ACML: export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/site/VERSIONS/acml-3.6.0/gfortran64_int64/lib BLAS=--with-blas="-L/site/VERSIONS/acml-3.6.0/gfortran64_int64/lib -lacml" LAPACK=--with-lapack # MKL 11: BLAS=--with-blas="-L/site/VERSIONS/intel-11.1/mkl/lib/em64t -lmkl_gf_lp64 -lmkl_sequential

While update 3 was released last week, it looks like there are 40 or so packages updated. I dunno about squid, it is listed on http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel4as-errata.html but the changelog is from October 2005 (unless it is an rhel only bug). audit-1.0.12-1.EL4.i386.rpm audit-libs-1.0.12-1.EL4.i386.rpm audit-libs-devel-1.0.12-1.EL4.i386.rpm bootparamd-0.17-21.RHEL4.i386.rpm

Hi, I'm trying to follow the R-admin instructions for using MKL10 as the external BLAS compiling R-2.6.2 under Linux on a RH EL head node of a cluster. The configure process seems to have problems when it checks for dgemm in the BLAS. I'm using configure as: ./configure CC=icc F77=ifort --with-lapack="$MKL" --with-blas="$MKL" where $MKL is defined as in R-admin

Package: xen-hypervisor-3.0-unstable-1-amd64 Version: 3.0-unstable+hg11292-2 Severity: important My server is a dell 2950 server. Before the dom0 rebooting bug ocurred, xen was well even for hvm domU. By now i have tried xen-hypervisor-3.0-amd64 (3.0.2+hg9697-2) and xen-hypervisor-3.0-unstable-1-amd64 (3.0-unstable+hg11292-2), but both of them are unusable for me. for

I appear to be having a problem with samba using kerberos to authenticate to a win2k pdc. Background: Windows 2kSP4 PDC. WhiteBox Enterprise Linux 3 running 2.4.21-4.ELsmp on x86. samba 3.0.2-6.3E.i386 from the distribution's rpm. krb5-1.3.1 I can successfully use "net ads join" and see the computer appear in Active Directory. I can use kinit to authenticate via kerberos, and

attached is the vmx domain save/restore patch. works well for different guest/host combination W/O breaking domu save/restore according to my test. pls. first apply xiaowei''s qemu dm fix. ===know issue=== * shpage pfn * HV look for shpage pfn in an e820 entry when init. but some guest(win/em64t linux) will reuse this e820 ram, which cause losing shpage pfn when restore. so this

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When