similar to: SMART for SATA devices ?

Is the new kernel 2.6.9-34 the one that will come with 4.3 ?

I've upgraded my x86_64 4.2 box to the latest kernel 2.6.9.34 and tried an lvm snapshot. It worked fine and I was able to mount the snapshot etc. Now I cannot seem to remove the snapshot. If I try a 'lvremove' it asks if I want to remove the 'active' snapshot, if I say yes it just hangs and the box goes to 99% wait io, however the disk lights do not come on during this. The

On Feb 3, 2016, at 17:10, Warren Young wrote: > smartctl can see through several different types of RAID controller to the underlying physical disks via its -d option. This is what I have: # smartctl --all /dev/sda smartctl 5.43 2012-06-30 r3573 [i686-linux-2.6.32-573.12.1.el6.i686] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-12 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net Vendor:

Hello, I was wondering what is the smallest install that anyone has managed with 4 (4.2 to be precise) ? I'm looking at a machine running as a VPN in a DMZ, so I'm going to remove/NOT INSTALL things like gcc, X, etc. I'm planning on putting this on a 1gb USB stick and booting from it. That reminds me, was there going to be a 1 CD server install image ? The other thing I noticed is

Hello all, I'm looking at setting up a sort of 'appliance' server and as such its really not going to have a lot packages etc. I thought of installing 4.2 on a 1gb USB stick, however, the stick is not even recongnized by anaconda. It did appear when I did 'modprobe usb-storage.ko' as /dev/sdc (i have already have 2 SATA disks which are sda, sdb). Then the disk partitioner

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=562 kernel at linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kernel at linuxace.com Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

I recently added a Seagate 400Gb SATA drive to my system, and it has been behaving strangely since I put it in. for one thing, the BIOS S.M.A.R.T. came up with a warning the last time I booted with it enabled, saying that I should backup my data and replace the disk (!). I still have not made any irreversible data transfers to this drive, and I have some time yet to take it back, but I'd

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=562 Summary: Rule gets implicitly eliminated ("optimized away") --> But that's not ok --> A Logic Bug Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

On 8/5/2015 1:00 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey at buc.com> wrote: >> How would I go about pointing it at the partition? >> >> What I am currently doing is this: >> device (hd0) /dev/hdg >> root (hd0,0) >> setup (hd0) > > setup (hd1,0) > > It's hd1 if your device map is correct and

Hi, The server is running CentOS 5.8 Linux OS on Dell PowerEdge R710 having raid controller card 03:00.0 RAID bus controller: LSI Logic /Symbios Logic MegaRAID SAS 2108 [Liberator] (rev 05) /usr/sbin/smartctl -a /dev/sda smartctl version 5.38 [x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-8 Bruce Allen Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/ Device: DELL PERC H700 Version: 2.10 DELL

Has anyone gotten this to work ? I can define a raid device but cant put a VG on it. I then tried 'autopartition' and it created an 'LVM' of sorts, when I tried to edit it I wasnt able to as a message appeared saying, LVM editing was not allowed in text mode. Any help ? Cheers, Brian. PS - PIII-500mhz 128mb RAM, 4mb AGP.

John R Pierce wrote: > On 10/21/2016 2:03 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >> >> My ssds are failing? > > SSD's wear out based on writes per block. they distribute those > writes, but once each block has been written X number of times, they are > no longer reliable. > > they appear to still be working perfectly, but they are beyond their > design life. soon

Since repeated power cuts last week I've been a bit worried about the state of my server. Today it spontaneously rebooted - but failed to complete. Now it isn't recognising me as a user, by the look of it, so I've got some questions before I do something that might make things worse. I can boot as root, and it appears that all my files are present. System-config-user sees me as user

Am 26.08.2016 um 18:43 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > What shouldn't have happened was somebody massively changing a > wiki page without changing the header, this way lies confusion. I haven't seen this. I don't have this page on my watchlist. Usually I have a short look what people changed on the pages I have on my watchlist. Regards, Marc

On 4/22/20 8:53 AM, Christopher Wensink wrote: > I had an 8 TB External USB disk plugged into the system, that I had been > using for additional space for backups, I was under the impression that > sda, sdb, sdc, and sdd were the four disks on the raid controller card, Not exactly.? If you have a RAID5 array, then you have one volume spread across the physical disks.? You can then

On Feb 3, 2016, at 16:13, Warren Young wrote: > A dying hard disk can do it. HDDs try to silently paper over I/O errors, but what they can?t hide is the time it takes to do this. If your HDD is constantly correcting errors at the oxide layer, it will be reeeeeallly sllllow. > > You can try running SMART tests on it, though that?s not guaranteed to show the problem. Well, it?s not ?a?

We have a very old Dell desk top machine that has been running CentOS 6 for the past five years.? It received a new, 1 TB disk and additional memory before the OS installation.? It has been the primary Linux machine in our smallest and most remote field office.? It has been updated at least once a week and has all current dates installed. Boot-up this morning lasted about six times as long as

NOTE: this is happening on Centos 6 x86_64, 2.6.32-504.3.3.el6.x86_64 not Centos 5 Dell PowerEdge 2970, Seagate SATA drive, non-raid. I have this server which has been dying randomly, with no logs. I had a tail -f over ssh for a week, when this just happened. Feb 8 00:10:21 thirteen-230 kernel: mptscsih: ioc0: attempting task abort! (sc=ffff880057a0a080) Feb 8 00:10:21 thirteen-230 kernel:

Ok....so after installing "smartmontools" on my CentOS machine...and connectiing this drive externally...i got positive reports from both the short and long tests...so the drive can obviously be "seen"....but when I look for it in the /dev/ directory...it doesn't show up.....I'm about to give the fdisk command line tools anonther shot....it allows me to format the

Hi all, For those of you that have been using the ext4 technology preview on CentOS 5.5, how has it panned out? Does it perform as expected? How do you feel the stability, creation of the FS and the administration of it is? Ideas and comments welcome. Thanks. -- BW, Sorin ----------------------------------------------------------- # Sorin Srbu [Sysadmin, Systems Engineer] # Dept of Medicinal