similar to: dedup source code

Deduplication was committed last night by Mr. Bonwick: > Log message: > PSARC 2009/571 ZFS Deduplication Properties > 6677093 zfs should have dedup capability http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/onnv-notify/2009-November/010683.html Via c0t0d0s0.org.

I just went through a BFU update to snv_127 on a V880 : neptune console login: root Password: Nov 3 08:19:12 neptune login: ROOT LOGIN /dev/console Last login: Mon Nov 2 16:40:36 on console Sun Microsystems Inc. SunOS 5.11 snv_127 Nov. 02, 2009 SunOS Internal Development: root 2009-Nov-02 [onnv_127-tonic] bfu''ed from /build/archives-nightly-osol/sparc on 2009-11-03 I have [

Hi. I thought I''d take a stab at the first steps of porting ZFS to Darwin. I realize there are rumors that Apple is already doing this, but my contact at Apple has yet to get back to me to verify this. In the meantime, I wanted to see how hard it would be. I started with libzfs, and promptly ran into issues with libnvpair. It wants sys/nvpair.h, but I can''t find that in the

Hi: I am very interested in the ZFS deduplication, where can I get the the source code? Or would anybody send me an actual source code achive which contains the ZFS deduplication? I am looking forward your kind help. Thanks very much. Best Rgards -- Yujuan Tan, PhD Candidate Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Wuhan, China Key Lab of Information Storage, Ministry of Education,

(i use the term loosely because i know that zfs likes whole volumes better) when installing ubuntu, i got in the habit of using a separate partition for my home directory so that my data and gnome settings would all remain intact when i reinstalled or upgraded. i''m running osol 2008.11 on an ultra 20, which has only two drives. i''ve got all my data located in my home directory,

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=866 --- Comment #17 from Olav Morken <olavmrk at gmail.com> 2009-03-09 06:21:16 --- Created an attachment (id=1610) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=1610) Patch which allows OpenSSH to ignore unknown options. This is a patch which implements alternative 1 from Josh Triplett. This patch makes ssh ignore all unknown

Does opensolaris iSCSI target support SCSI-3 PGR reservation ? My goal is to use the iSCSI LUN created by [1] or [2] as a quorum device for a 3-node suncluster. [1] zfs set shareiscsi=on <storage-pool/zfs volume name> [2] iscsitadm create target ..... Thanks, -- leon This message posted from opensolaris.org

Hello zfs-code, http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/uts/common/fs/zfs/vdev_cache.c 72 * All i/os smaller than zfs_vdev_cache_max will be turned into 73 * 1<<zfs_vdev_cache_bshift byte reads by the vdev_cache (aka software 74 * track buffer). At most zfs_vdev_cache_size bytes will be kept in each 75 * vdev''s vdev_cache. While it

In another thread recursive snapshot creation was found atomic so that it is done quickly, and more important, all at once or nothing at all. Do you know if recursive destroying and renaming of snapshots are atomic too? Regards Henrik Heino

Hi all, Is there some documentation or some example on how to interpret the arg0 .. arg<n> for the aioread, aiowrite, aiowait syscalls? The system call name for all three seems to be "kaio". Michael === Michael Mueller ================== Tel. + 49 8171 63600 Fax. + 49 8171 63615 Web: http://www.michael-mueller-it.de ======================================

I look after an x4500 for a client and wee keep getting drives marked as degraded with just over 20 checksum errors. Most of these errors appear to be driver or hardware related and thier frequency increases during a resilver, which can lead to a death spiral. The increase in errors within a vdev during a resilver (I recently had three drives in an 8 drive raidz vdev "degraded")

Hello. I have a Solaris 11/11 x86 box (which I migrated from SolEx 11/10 a couple of weeks ago). Without no obvious reason (at least for me), after an uptime of 1 to 2 days (observed 3 times now) Solaris sets arc_no_grow to 1 and then never sets it back to 0. ARC is being shrunk to less than 1 GB -- needless to say that performance is terrible. There is not much load on this system. Memory

I''m working on a case where customer has a 3rd party streams driver/module, called uplink, which sits over Sun''s ce driver. This 3rd party module is used by the telco to perform telco grade NIC failover. The customer was given an IDR ce driver, to avoid a panic they were given. The IDR driver was successful in avoiding the panic, but now the customer is getting many

Hi All ; What is the status of ZFS on linux and what are the kernel''s supported? Regards Mertol <http://www.sun.com/> http://www.sun.com/emrkt/sigs/6g_top.gif Mertol Ozyoney Storage Practice - Sales Manager Sun Microsystems, TR Istanbul TR Phone +902123352200 Mobile +905339310752 Fax +902123352222 Email <mailto:Ayca.Yalcin at Sun.COM> mertol.ozyoney at

I have found that pid provider can not create memcpy:return probe for 64bit process on snv_110. For example, the pid is 10603, I will have following output for dtrace command: #dtrace -n pid10603:libc.so.1:memcpy:return dtrace: invalid probe specifier pid10603:libc.so.1:memcpy:return: probe description pid10603:libc.so.1:memcpy:return does not match any probes This just

I have an Ultra 10 client running Sol10 U3 that has a zfs pool set up on the extra space of the internal ide disk. There''s just the one fs and it is shared with the sharenfs property. When this system reboots nfs/server ends up getting disabled and this is the error from the SMF logs: [ Apr 16 08:41:22 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/nfs-server start") ] [ Apr 16

Hi list, while preparing for the changed ACL/mode_t mapping semantics coming with onnv-147 [1], I discovered that in onnv-134 on my system ACLs are not inherited when aclmode is set to passthrough for the filesystem. This very much puzzles me. Example: $ uname -a SunOS os 5.11 snv_134 i86pc i386 i86pc $ pwd /Volumes/ACLs/dir1 $ zfs list | grep /Volumes rpool/Volumes 7,00G 39,7G 6,84G

I''m a fan of ZFS since I''ve read about it last year. Now I''m on the way to build a home fileserver and I''m thinking to go with Opensolaris and eventually ZFS!! Apart from the other components, the main problem is to choose the motherboard. The offer is incredibly high and I''m lost. Minimum requisites should be: - working well with Open Solaris ;-) -

Solaris and/or ZFS are badly confused about drive IDs. The "c5t0d0" names are very far removed from the real world, and possibly they''ve gotten screwed up somehow. Is devfsadm supposed to fix those, or does it only delete excess? Reason I believe it''s confused: zpool status shows mirror-0 on c9t3d0, c9t2d0, and c9t5d0. But format shows the one remaining Seagate

Hi, In Solairs Dtrace User Guide, page 193, it lists the arguments of ERROR probe. One of these arguments is arg3, it is explained as "The DIF offset into that action or -1 if not applicable". Then what does the abbr. DIF mean? Regards TJ