similar to: server vendor

We're going to replace an older Solaris7/Netbackup/TapeRobot server with a new Centos box using backup-to-disk-to-tape (probably using Arkeia). The specs are up in the air, but generally: - CentOS/RHEL friendly (3Ware SATA? SCSI?) - 2U/3U/4U-ish form factor - hotswap RAID5 - dual PS, hotswap a plus - USB2.0 port(s) (*) To give you an idea of where I'm starting to look, take a gander at

Howdy. I've been having trouble finding a fairly modern server that meets the following requirements: - Molex power connectors (don't want to use the Digium FXS power supply) - 4 PCI slots, one full-length (TDM2400P, 2xT100P, additional NIC) - dual power supplies - preferably dual CPUs >= 1GHz - preferably rack-mountable (3-4RU) - CentOS-friendly We'd also like to stay away from

Hi all, I have a client who is currently using an UPSonic IRT1000 UPS (http://www.upsonic.com.au/industrial-rt.php), and is running NUT 2.2.1-2.1ubuntu7.2 on Ubuntu Hardy, which I've not been able to get to work using either USB or RS232. I *believe* the UPS is supposed to use the Megatec driver, but am not 100% sure. I can see three possible resolutions to my problem, which leads me to

I've priced some 1 and 2U Dell servers. Now, I'd like to perform a price comparison of COTS hardware for 1 and 2U servers. What VAR companies do people recommend I check out for putting machines together? I'm perfectly capable of installing and swapping hardware components when/where needed, so on-sight support is not needed. Thanks much. Scott

Hi all, As per the instructions here <http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#obtaining-commit-access>, I contacted Chris Lattner to obtain commit access but haven't received a response (either positive or negative). What's the expected turnaround time for this (I contacted him five days ago)? In case he's currently unavailable, is there someone else I could contact? Thanks,

I'm looking for anyone who has some vendors for rackmount PC hardware in a fairly decent configuration for Asterisk/Digium T1 termination. I am looking for well-built hardware from an integrator that understands correct component choice. Preferably, I'd like SCSI but I might be able to do Ultra-IDE platforms. I need at least two PCI slots in the chassis (so 2u/3u size factor is OK.)

Thank you for reading this, sorry to waste bandwidth otherwise. I am part of a US company looking for someone to setup a demo IVR system for us. I seem unable with my current knowledge to pull this off myself. The demo is the regular enter your id and validate/repeat/continue methodoligy you put up with in everyday life. I would like to have the validation and other parts done via database

Signed-off-by: Nikos Skalkotos <skalkoto@grnet.gr> --- src/inspect-fs-unix.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/inspect-fs-unix.c b/src/inspect-fs-unix.c index 01a59f1..f55e53b 100644 --- a/src/inspect-fs-unix.c +++ b/src/inspect-fs-unix.c @@ -58,8 +58,8 @@ COMPILE_REGEXP (re_scientific_linux, "Scientific Linux.*release

These 3 patches implement support for APIs which must accept a mountable, but don't update apis which must return mountables. Matt

This type is initially identical to Device. --- generator/bindtests.ml | 2 +- generator/c.ml | 7 +++++-- generator/csharp.ml | 6 ++++-- generator/daemon.ml | 4 ++-- generator/erlang.ml | 6 +++--- generator/fish.ml | 8 ++++---- generator/gobject.ml | 11 ++++++----- generator/haskell.ml | 11 +++++++---- generator/java.ml | 10 +++++-----

Hi there, Latest and greatest version including all new remarks from both Pino and Rich. Cédric Bosdonnat (3): configure: handle older version of ncurses api: add mountable_device and mountable_subvolume fish: fix btrfs subvolumes display in error case fish/options.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++- generator/actions.ml | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ m4/guestfs_libraries.m4

Hey there! Here are a few patches to fix unrelated things: one fixes the configure for older ncurses releases having no pkg-config files. The other two are fixing what Richard mentioned about guestfs subvolumes display Cédric Bosdonnat (3): configure: handle older version of ncurses api: add mountable_device and mountable_subvolume fish: fix btrfs subvolumes display in error case

This test uses btrfs, so skip it if the "btrfs" feature is not available. --- tests/mountable/test-internal-parse-mountable.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/tests/mountable/test-internal-parse-mountable.c b/tests/mountable/test-internal-parse-mountable.c index ed3264e..bf03743 100644 --- a/tests/mountable/test-internal-parse-mountable.c +++

Hi all, Here is version 2 of the patch series, including the changes for Pino's remarks. Cédric Bosdonnat (3): configure: handle older version of ncurses api: add mountable_device and mountable_subvolume fish: fix btrfs subvolumes display in error case fish/options.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++- generator/actions.ml | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++

[PATCH 1/7] mount: Add mount_vfs_nochroot This is significantly reworked from before. umount is gone as discussed, and variable motion is minimised. [PATCH 2/7] btrfs: Update btrfs_subvolume_list to take Already provisionally ACKed. Previous comment was that cleanup could be tidier. I looked into creating a new cleanup function for fs_buf, but it isn't possible (or simple, anyway) in this

Hello, I've been trying to run the tests from master, before applying my patches and it's not not working. I always get this: # make -C tests/mountable check make: Entering directory `/root/src/libguestfs/tests/mountable' make test-internal-parse-mountable make[1]: Entering directory `/root/src/libguestfs/tests/mountable' make[1]: `test-internal-parse-mountable' is up to

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek < kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 4/17/2013 12:15 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > >> >> Give a compelling argument and I might :) >> > > The cost is the extra time spent verifying that the binaries are fresh. > In my experience it has never happened that I ran "make check" on a wrong >

This test uses btrfs, so skip it if either the "btrfs" feature or the btrfs filesystem is not available. --- tests/mountable/test-internal-parse-mountable.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) diff --git a/tests/mountable/test-internal-parse-mountable.c b/tests/mountable/test-internal-parse-mountable.c index ed3264e..0638fc0 100644 ---

Hello I do have problem using Linux with an external HP tape drive. The server platform is also an HP Server; the server is an HP ML350 G4, and the Tape drive is a HP Storage Works Ultrium 448 - 1U Rack-mountable. HP Ultrium documentation says two drivers should be automatically up, sym53c8xx for LSI SCSI interface "st" for tape and /proc/scsi/scsi should contain information about

No actual behaviour, other than getting rid of a bash warning. --- tests/mountable/test-mountable-inspect.sh | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tests/mountable/test-mountable-inspect.sh b/tests/mountable/test-mountable-inspect.sh index 906263b..10d1e9f 100755 --- a/tests/mountable/test-mountable-inspect.sh +++ b/tests/mountable/test-mountable-inspect.sh @@ -66,7