similar to: Missing Dependencies

I want to install TinyCA2 on my Centos5 setup. I had a real learning experience the last time around (last year, July) and in the end, I got the repo down from Dag's site and was cool. Now I am on Centos 5 and no TinyCA2. Can I just download the EL4 rpm from: http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el4/en/i386/dag/repodata/repoview/tinyca2-0-0.7.5-2.el4.rf.html and do a yum localinstall ? Or do I have

I am told by yum localinstall that I need this for TinyCA2. When I search for it, it seems like it SHOULD be part of basic perl package, but it is hard to argue with yum on dependencies.....

http://tinyca.sm-zone.net/ has the following: "RPM for SuSE Linux 9.3 : <http://tinyca.sm-zone.net/tinyca2-0.7.2-0.noarch.rpm>tinyca2-0.7.2-0.noarch.rpm (Should work with the most current distributions) " Will this RPM work on Centos 4.2? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I need perl-Gtk2 for TinyCA2. I find it on centos.karan.org After many misteps, I add bout kbsingh-Centos-Extras.repro and kbsingh-Centos-Misc.repro to /etc/yum.repro.d I do a yum install perl-Glib and it finally goes, adding perl-ExtUtils and warning me about user mockbuild does not exist. Then I try install perl-Gtk2 and it fails: yum install perl-Gtk2 Setting up Install Process Setting

I want to just see what will happen (ie success, or some dependencies still cannot be met) with: yum localinstall whatever.rpm I ASSuME (I have googled for this, but it is not clear) that localinstall will take the rpm, install it, and go to the yum repro to meet any outstanding dependencies. I just want to test this right now, not actually do it. I want to know what yum would install from

I could use some assistance getting CPAN functional again. CPAN stopped working on Centos 4.2 x64, and I can no longer install modules. I did a install Bundle::CPAN and upgraded to 1.8.2, and perl was updated afterwards via yum update. The error seems related to GPG, does anyone know if 1.8.2 added new restrictions on signatures? $ sudo perl -MCPAN -e shell cpan shell -- CPAN exploration

Hi all. I'm using a CentOS 6.8 VM to do volunteer builds for an open source project. I want to build Pale Moon with a gtk2 library older than 2.24, to allow people with older linuxes to run it. Short summary, if built against version gtk2-2.24 and/or higher, the binary will use a function that does not exist in gtk2-2.23 and lower. Net result is that the program dies with an

New version of chromium (34.0.1847.132) chromium-34.0.1847.132-1.el6.i686.rpm <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9RlkKQB1POSR0pRLXU1Q1JQTmc/edit?usp=sharing> Source: chromium-34.0.1847.132-1.el6.src.rpm <https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9RlkKQB1POSd1NWWDM2bHRpU1k/edit> I was *OBLIGED* to patch gtk2-2.20.1 in order to build it: gtk2-2.20.1-5.el6.i686.rpm

On 01/09/2017 07:54 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Jan 9, 2017, at 4:08 AM, Walter Dnes <waltdnes at waltdnes.org> wrote: >> Hi all. I'm using a CentOS 6.8 VM to do volunteer builds for an open >> source project. I want to build Pale Moon with a gtk2 library older >> than 2.24, to allow people with older linuxes to run it. Short summary, >> if built

This alias should be a great default addition to the bashrc... as it helps install packages to a CentOS system from the mounted install CD before you get networking up and running... alias localyum='yum --disablerepo=* localinstall' Does Red Hat care about Requests for Enhancement? or is filing a bug pointless? FC

hi all, i'm trying to understand an issue i'm having with a yum repo (it's a mirror of the c74 repo). there's an rpm in the repo (ibutils-libs in this case); but the client using this repo says it cannot find this rpm (i did yum info ibutils-libs --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=c74 to exclude all other repos). other rpms are ok to use, so nothing structural going wrong (i think)

Has anyone tested installing the newer kernels from elrepo (or somewhere else) in order to keep google-chrome updated beyond version 27? Actually, i assumed a newer kernel would come with a newer glibc but i do not see a newer glibc via elrepo, just newer kernels. hmmm. # yum --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=elrepo* info glibc | grep -i repo only lists my already installed glibc packages from

What is there available for Centos? Now that Audacity is no longer available to us... I do have Audacity on an XP system, so I do have the option to shuffle files between systems....

If I can squeeze a message between the discussions on security (:-)) I have been trying to compile a kernel on an x86_64 box under CentOS4.1 and now 4.2. The problem is that neither make xconfig or make gconfig work: make gconfig * * Unable to find the GTK+ installation. Please make sure that * the GTK+ 2.0 development package is correctly installed... * You need gtk+-2.0, glib-2.0 and

I get interesting results on this one. If I run rpm -q -a | grep i386 as root, I get this: nspluginwrapper-i386-0.9.91.1-1 If I run as my local non-root user, I get this: libgcc-3.4.6-3.i386 libselinux-1.19.1-7.2.i386 libstdc++-3.4.6-3.i386 krb5-libs-1.3.4-33.i386 dbus-glib-0.22-12.EL.7.i386 flash-plugin-9.0.31.0-release.i386 libart_lgpl-2.3.16-3.i386

On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:40:52 +0000 Richard wrote: > The mate-gtk2/3 issue effects windows/menus/scrollbars and the like, > not the login screen. See: > > <https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2017-August/165955.html> > > for that issue. I switched to the Adwaita theme, as suggested there. Clearlooks-phenix also works fine with the latest C7/Mate and looks more like

Ran into this rather frustrating bug when working with VBOX on a Windows 10 host. It should come as no surprise that I would hit this bug when installing CentOS, and also with RHEL 7 Server with GUI (since you get the same kernel). Based on information from your bug list, I was fortunately able to workaround the trouble with: wget

What does this error mean? Updating : gtk2 35/178 g_module_open() failed for /usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-png.so: /usr/local/lib/libpng12.so.0: undefined symbol: inflateReset /usr/bin/gtk-query-immodules-2.0-64: /usr/local/lib/libpng12.so.0: no version information available (required by /usr/lib64/libcairo.so.2)

If I have a local rpm file, what is the difference between running "rpm -i" and "yum localinstall"? When I do "rpm -i", I can still see the info via "yum info", so is there a difference? -- Bowie

As in subject, am attempting to install latest LibreOffice on C7. unpack all the rpm files, type "yum install *.rpm", or "yum localinstall *.rpm" and yum spews the list of filenames (with the word "examining" in front of each file) then says "nothing to do". what the hey? I tried "yum clean all" but it didn't help. I also verified the