similar to: Constructing the transition pair using loop function and paste()

Hi, I would like to construct a transition matrix from a data frame with annual transitions of marked plants. plant<-c(1:6) class<-c("seed","seed", "seed", "veg", "rep", "rep") fate<-c("dead", "veg","veg","rep", "rep", "veg") trans<-data.frame(plant, class, fate)

Hi, I''ve got a rather confusing problem. My linux router box has several internet uplinks of various kinds (pppoe, ippp, ethernet). These uplinks are used by a tunnel to another location. It kinda looks like this: eth0 - internet uplink eth1 - LAN tun0 - tunnel device ppp0 - another internet uplink ... Routing is setup with iproute2 in a way that pakets with a source IP from the LAN

I really like the new mime type handler however I was trying to convert some code and couldn''t figure out how. My rails action was handle 2 formats, html and xml respond_to do |format| format.html # show.html.erb format.xml do if @account.active? && @account.valid_referer?(session[:referer]) render :xml => @account.to_xml(:except

I was guessing if its possible to make transitions effects for the code that are included inside @content_for_layout(ex: new, list, edit) like a fade out and fade in, right now im using the accordion effect of moo.fx but the content its to much inside and sometimes takes a while to load and show the effect properly. Any example or advice its more than welcome, ill keep searching about this.

Dear helpers, is there any possible that transition (in depmixS4) is in scale of two variable, e.g transition=~scale(x1,x2)? If it can be, how transition of two variable (covariate time) can be worked in depmixS4-hidden markov model for time series. Many thanks, nglthu -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/depmixS4-transition-tp4572726p4572726.html Sent from the R help

hi all - thoughts or pointes to the procedure for above... rich

While using acts_as_state_machine, I noticed it doesn''t error when invalid state transition is used. No false return, no exception. By invalid state transition, I mean utilizing an event that does not define the current state as a ''from'' state. Does anyone find this lacking? I would like to be able to catch invalid state transition (such as attempting to fulfill a

On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 13:41:42 +0200 Alexandre Colucci <timac at timac.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently studying the possibility to make the transition from > gcc 4.2 to llvm-gcc 4.2 for the projects I am working on. Since you are switching compilers, why not switch to clang instead of llvm-gcc? Best regards, --Edwin

On Jul 24, 2010, at 10:15 AM, Alexandre Colucci wrote: > > There are several reasons why I am currently not considering the transition to Clang (although I would love to switch to it): > > - Clang (LLVM compiler 2.x) is only integrated by default in Xcode 4 which has not been released yet. I guess it might be possible to use Clang in Xcode 3.2 and Xcode 3.1. Right. > - Clang

On 24 juil. 2010, at 20:29, Chris Lattner wrote: >> - I am not sure if clang can generate code that runs on 10.5. > > It can, but it does not support powerpc (llvm-gcc does). Really? I couldn't find any Apple documentation that mentions this. Also we have built powerpc code with the clang "LLVM compiler 1.5" and it does run on powerpc. Should we use the llvm-gcc

On 24.07.2010, at 21:27, Thomas Clement wrote: > On 24 juil. 2010, at 20:29, Chris Lattner wrote: > >>> - I am not sure if clang can generate code that runs on 10.5. >> >> It can, but it does not support powerpc (llvm-gcc does). > > Really? I couldn't find any Apple documentation that mentions this. > Also we have built powerpc code with the clang

I updated my from LLVM 2.7 to 2.8/trunk tonight and was mystified as to why my GC plugin silently stopped working. The problem was that the signature of the virtual function GCMetadataPrinter::finishAssembly (and beginAssembly) changed. This change would probably be an excellent candidate for the "gotchas" section of the 2.8 release notes. Thanks! -- Ben -------------- next part

Hi Ben, > I updated my from LLVM 2.7 to 2.8/trunk tonight and was mystified as to why my > GC plugin silently stopped working. > > The problem was that the signature of the virtual function > GCMetadataPrinter::finishAssembly (and beginAssembly) changed. > > This change would probably be an excellent candidate for the "gotchas" section > of the 2.8 release notes.

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 5:17 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Ben, > > > I updated my from LLVM 2.7 to 2.8/trunk tonight and was mystified as to > why my > > GC plugin silently stopped working. > > > > The problem was that the signature of the virtual function > > GCMetadataPrinter::finishAssembly (and beginAssembly) changed. >

Hi Alexander, while I can reproduce the problem with your example, inspection of the assembler shows that the frame pointer is being correctly set up in each function. So I don't think the problem is due to frame pointer elimination. Ciao, Duncan.

Hi Alexander, I took a look at how backtrace works and it doesn't use the frame pointer at all, instead it uses dwarf unwind tables. So to make it work using llc you need to do as follows: $ llc -unwind-tables bt.ll -o bt.S $ gcc -o bt-llc bt.S $ ./bt-llc 4 backtrace() returned 4 addresses ./bt-llc() [0x4007aa] ./bt-llc() [0x400856] ./bt-llc() [0x40087c] ./bt-llc() [0x400875] Ciao, Duncan.

I'm new to LLVM and I want to add support of emitting ELF to an existing port by transitioning it from using AsmPrinter to the MC streamer. After perusing the existing documents, it seems to me that the information available about the MC streamer is not as rich as about other parts of the compiler. Is there any document, paper or presentation out there that provides more information

Hmm, I'm not having much success in replicating the build environment for this - however, I did notice two patches in the ubuntu xen-api package that look relevant. The build failure appears to be related to xenguest, and there is a patch 'xenguest-4.2.patch' which looks worth a test. Also, I noticed another patch 'fix-xen-4.2-paths.patch' that might be relevant. Thomas,

On 10/09/13 14:09, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 09/10/2013 03:17 PM, St?phane Glondu wrote: >> Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a ?crit : >>> I wrote it many time to many people. Please don't just read 1.6 as "new >>> upstream release" for XCP. That's unfortunately not the way it works. >>> Upstream version for Debian and the one they do for

Le 24/09/2013 15:48, St?phane Glondu a ?crit : > If I remove all binary packages of xen-api from testing, the following > new packages are broken: xcp-guest-templates, nova-xcp-plugins, > nova-compute-xen. > > xcp-guest-templates is built by guest-templates which seems to be a leaf > package and could be removed from testing. > > On the other hand, both nova-* packages