similar to: Square ended segments

Hi there, I'm very new on R and I hope someone can help me to solve the problem in using the ifelse statement with the xtable function(library xtable). I'm trying to get the printing of the elements of two lists in a sorted way. These two list have in common the their names. I will try to give an example: the first list looks like this: $code1 Code code1 Nation

I have a data file in which one of the columns is country code and NA is the code for Namibia. When I read the data file using read.csv, NA for Namibia is being treated as null or "NA" How can I prevent this from happening? I tried the following but it didn't work input <- read.csv("padded.csv",header = TRUE,as.is = c("code2")) thanks, Suresh [[alternative

Hello! I am wondering if it's possible to run - in sequence - code that is stored in several R scripts. For example: Script in the file "code1.r" contains the code: a = 3; b = 5; c = a + b Script in the file "code2.r" contains the code: d = 10; e = d - c Script in the file "code3.r" contains the code: result=e/a I understand that I could write those 3 scripts

Dear all, I have a dataset as below: id code1 code2 p 1 4 8 0.1 1 5 7 0.9 2 1 8 0.4 2 6 2 0.2 2 4 3 0.6 3 5 6 0.7 3 7 5 0.9 I just want to rewrite it as this (vertical to horizontal): id var1 var2 var3

I am writing an interprocedural compiler pass. Because the passneeds information from a FunctionPass, e.g., the post-dominance frontier (PDF), and because a ModulePass is not permitted to require a FunctionPass, I am forced to make my pass a FunctionPass and do majority of its work in the doFinalization() method. When I run "opt -mypass -verify -o code2.bc code1.bc" I get no

I followed what you said and called verifyModule() with the AbortProcessAction option. verifyModule() returns false, but does not abort and does not print out any information about what caused the verification to fail. Chris Lattner wrote: > On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Ryan M. Lefever wrote: >> I am writing an interprocedural compiler pass. Because the passneeds >> information from a

I also tried iterating through the functions of the module and calling verifyFunction(), which also returns false, but does not cause an abort or report anything to stderr about what caused the verification to fail. From the doxygen for verifyFunction() and verifyModule(), it seems like they both should print information to stderr if the verification fails and should abort opt if

On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Ryan M. Lefever wrote: > I am writing an interprocedural compiler pass. Because the passneeds > information from a FunctionPass, e.g., the post-dominance frontier > (PDF), and because a ModulePass is not permitted to require a > FunctionPass, I am forced to make my pass a FunctionPass and do majority > of its work in the doFinalization() method. ok > When

Hi, I have a large data frame and within this there is one column which contains individual codes (eg. 1.1234.2a.2). I am splitting these codes into their 4 components using strsplit (eg. "1", "1234", "2a", "2"). However there are some individual codes which do not have a last component (eg. 2.4356.3b. ), I want to give these codes a "1" as their

Dear R-users, I would like to have some advises about a problem illustrated by the following snippet. Within myf, I need to evaluate a piece of R code that is passed as a character argument and then return the objects that are created by this code. The difficulty comes from the fact that the content of the code is variable and unknown to me (obviously not in this illustration!). With the

Any idea why CHAR(asChar(STRING_ELT( produces NA whereas CHAR(STRING_ELT( gets a pointer to a string? It's generally expected that STRING_ELT should already be a character, but why the coercion does not work? Here is a simple example (consistent over R2.5.1-R2.6 rev 42284, I didn't check earlier versions, but it used to be different in 2.4): install.packages("inline")

I think I misread the doxygen. verifyFunction & verifyModule return false if no errors are detected. However, my question now becomes why does the code produced by my transform pass verification, but it causes an assertion failure in the byte reader when it (the code produced by my transform) is passed to another invocation of opt? Ryan M. Lefever wrote: > I also tried iterating

Dear list, I?m having a little trouble with adding vertical lines to a histogram. I need to draw a matrix of histograms (using facets), and in each histogram add a vertical line indicating the mean value of the data in each facet. According to the last example in the geom_hline help, to display different lines in each facet I need to provide a data frame. I modified this example to make a plot

Greetings. I'm having some trouble constructing a contingency table from raw data (actually read in via RPgSQL). Here's the deal: - What I've got: a data frame in the form: Groupcode code1 code2 code3 code4 code5 .. coden where groupcode is one of {P,C,B,S,U,X} and code{1..n} is TRUE or FALSE. code{1..n} are NOT mutually exclusive, so between 0 and n of them can be TRUE. -

The OpenSSH and ssh.com agents use a completely different set of messages for dealing with DSA keys, so I don't expect the OpenSSH client to be able to get DSA keys from ssh-agent2. However, if I'm running "ssh-agent2 -1", I expect OpenSSH to be able to use RSA keys stored in ssh-agent2's agent1 compatibility box. And it does. However, there's a problem. If I'm

<font size=2 face="sans-serif">Hi Johannes,</font><br><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Thank you for the explanation.</font><br><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I think we need to clarify some details about code generation in Clang today:</font><br><br><font size=2

I've been trying to find an answer on other sites however I could not resolve my problem. spec: os: ubuntu 10.0, OpenSSH_5.5p1 Debian-4ubuntu4, OpenSSL 0.9.8o problem: When trying to restart deamons on remote pcs having the same specs, sometimes deamons are executed succesfully and sometimes not. I am using the following command: ssh -t -vvv "$host" 'sudo

Hi,all: I am a new at writing LLVM PASS, i write a pass like this : using namespace llvm; namespace { class RuntimeEval : public ModulePass { public: static char ID; // Pass identification, replacement for typeid RuntimeEval() : ModulePass(ID) { } virtual bool runOnModule(Module &M) { return false; } }; } char HSASupportedRuntimeEval::ID = 0;

Where we are ------------ Currently, when we generate OpenMP target offloading code for GPUs, we use sufficient syntactic criteria to decide between two execution modes: 1) SPMD -- All target threads (in an OpenMP team) run all the code. 2) "Guarded" -- The master thread (of an OpenMP team) runs the user code. If an OpenMP distribute region is encountered,

I am probably missing something quite obvious, but any help would be appreciated. I am continually getting people misreading the lattice plots because they are expecting the strip (with the factor names in them) to be below the graph. Is there anyway of achieving this. Secondly, from a more personal note I find the grid formed by the axes to be a bit overpowering and would like to make it a