similar to: question about string to boor?

Dear R-users, I state that this is for beginners, so you may ignore this in order not to be irritated. By the way, "patience" is another important thing, together with "kindness", we should keep in mind when we teach students and our own children as Jim Lemon pointed out well in the context of the Socratic method. You may know that being kind does not mean giving

Hi! I am doing a permutation test on 7 data randomly selected into two groups, one has 4 and the other 3. The purpose is to list all the 35 possible outcomes and calculate p-value. I googled the function perm.test() and not sure if my usage is correct. So I set a=c(7 data), b=(1,1,1,1,2,2,2) which represents the group. Then I use the function pt=perm.test(a,b...). There's a p-value popped

Dear fellow R users, I would like to draw a "sunflowerplot" because I have data (decade by month) that plots multiple times on the same x-y co-ordinates. Further I would like to colour each of the points/sunflower leaves on the plot according to the group they belong to (i.e. which type of event each represents within that decade and month). I thought that this would be relatively

With a has_one/belongs_to relationship, what''s the best way to guarantee that the belongs_to object gets created and is accessible alongside the has_one object? I *think* the after_create callback is a good choice, but I discovered an oddity while trying it. F''rinstance, if every horse has a carriage: ============ ActiveRecord::Schema.define do create_table(:horses) {|t|

On 06/04/15 12:37, buhorojo wrote: > On 05/04/15 19:41, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 05/04/15 16:11, buhorojo wrote: >>> On 05/04/15 17:03, Reindl Harald wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 05.04.2015 um 16:55 schrieb buhorojo: >>>>> We don't want best anything >>>> >>>> sad enough >>>>

Hi, I am trying to automate the creation of tables for some simply analyses. There are lots and lots of tables, thus the creation of a user-defined function to make and output them to excel. My problem is that some of the analyses have convergence issues, which I want captured and included in the output so the folks looking at them know how to view those estimates. I am successfully able to do

library(plyr) n<-100000 grp1<-sample(1:750, n, replace=T) grp2<-sample(1:750, n, replace=T) d<-data.frame(x=rnorm(n), y=rnorm(n), grp1=grp1, grp2=grp2) system.time({ d$avx1 <- ave(d$x, list(d$grp1, d$grp2)) d$avy1 <- ave(d$y, list(d$grp1, d$grp2)) }) # user system elapsed # 39.300 0.279 40.809 system.time({ d$avx2 <- ave(d$x, interaction(d$grp1, d$grp2, drop =

Hi, I have a data.frame that has a categorical variable, for which I would like to look at the distribution of levels of this variable, based on a grouping of two other variables. As an example: x <- data.frame(obs=sample(c('low', 'high'),100, replace=TRUE), grp1=sample(1:10, 100, replace=TRUE), grp2=runif(100)) cut.grp1 <- cut(x$grp1, 3) cut.grp2 <- cut(x$grp2, 3)

Hi All, I am using Samba 3.2.11 on sles 10. I have create a Unix group 'grp1' and mapped it to a ntgroup "Group One". Unix group 'grp1' has one user i.e 'usr1'. 'net groupmap' command show the mapping with correct SID and gid value. Please, have a look here. # cat /etc/group | grep grp1 grp1:!:12613:usr1,raj1,raj2 # # net groupmap list Group One

Hi, I would like to fit an (interpolating) spline to data where the derivatives at the endpoints of the interval are nonzero, thus the natural spline endpoint-specification does not make sense. Books (de Boor, etc) suggest that in this case I use not-a-knot splines. I know what not-a-knot splines are (so if I were solving for the coefficients directly I knew how to do this), but I don't

I'd like to summarize several variables in a data frame, for multiple groups, and store the results in a data.frame. To do so, I'm using by(). For example: df<-data.frame(a=1:10,b=11:20,c=21:30,grp1=c("x","y"),grp2=c("x","y"),grp3=c("x","y")) dfsum<-by(df[c("a","b","c")],

tryCatch() is good for catching errors but not so good for warnings, as it does not let you resume evaluating the expression that emitted the warning. withCallingHandlers(), with its companion invokeRestart(), lets you collect the warnings while letting the evaluation run to completion. Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2:45 PM, Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at

1. I did not attempt to sort through your voluminous code. But I suspect you are trying to reinvent wheels. 2. I don't understand this: "I've failed to find a solution after much searching of various R related forums." A web search on "error handling in R" **immediately** brought up ?tryCatch, which I think is what you want. If not, you should probably explain why it

Hi folks, has anybody a simple solution for the following request? I have a group alias (all at company.com). (1) Only company.com accounts should be able to send an email to everybody in that company via all at company.com. (2) - rather optional: refine the restrictions, e.g. two groups, grp1 at company.com and grp2 at company.com. Grp1 members should be able to send mails to grp2 but not vice

Dear Helpful R Users, I am graphing some data using the beanplot, but I am having trouble getting the output I desire. I have five tanks (A-E) and 2 groups for each tank grp1 or grp2, except tank C where there is only grp1. (I only changed the grouprep to "C grp1" for the example) When I plot them, I would like A B C(only grp1 - half of the bean plot) then D and E (as full beans).

You can capture warnings by using withCallingHandlers. Here is an example, its help file has more information. dataList <- list( A = data.frame(y=c(TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE), x=1:5), B = data.frame(y=c(TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE), x=1:5), C = data.frame(y=c(FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE), x=1:5)) withWarnings <- function(expr) { .warnings <- NULL # warning handler will

On Wed, 5 Dec 2018, Alexander Dalloz wrote: >> I have a group alias (all at company.com). >> (1) Only company.com accounts should be able to send an email to everybody >> in that company via all at company.com. >> (2) - rather optional: refine the restrictions, e.g. two groups, >> grp1 at company.com and grp2 at company.com. Grp1 members should be able to send

Hi, I have a vector of data, that I group based on two factors via tapply. For each such grouping I would like to plot a pie chart. I can layout these pie charts in a matrix layout, correpsonding to the levels of the two factors. But I am getting stuck on how to label the rows and colums. My current approach looks like this: x <- data.frame(obs=sample(c('low', 'high'),100,

Hello all, I have arranged my data as per Dennis's suggestion in this post http://www.mail-archive.com/r-help at r-project.org/msg107156.html. the posted code works fine but when I try to apply it to my data, i get "> u2 <- ddply(xxm, .(plateid, cytokine), as.data.frame.function(f)) Error in t.test.formula(conc ~ Self_T1D, data = df, na.rm = T) : grouping factor must have

On 06/04/15 13:06, buhorojo wrote: > On 06/04/15 14:00, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 06/04/15 12:37, buhorojo wrote: >>> On 05/04/15 19:41, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>> On 05/04/15 16:11, buhorojo wrote: >>>>> On 05/04/15 17:03, Reindl Harald wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Am 05.04.2015 um 16:55 schrieb