similar to: Wilcox Test / Mann Whitney U Test

Hi all, We have recently implemented an Asterisk system using Trixbox (asterisk v1.4.4 at the moment, yet to move to 1.4.9) but are getting pressure to switch back to our old key system unless we fix two major issues. So please help me avoid switching back! An overview: We have about 12 Linksys SPA941 SIP phones connected on a private switched network to our asterisk box which is a

Hi all, I am a biostatistician and I have developed my own ranking system for clinical data. I would like to test the efficiency of it w.r.t. to other ranking systems. I would like to simulate the data and after assigning ranks to my observed scores(after neglecting dropouts), observe the type I error. If I want to do a Kruuskal Wallis type of test, what test statistic should I use to test for a

Hey all. This morning I found that my audio playback is randomly sprinkled with sound skips and dropouts. I went to /var/log/yum.log and found this: Feb 09 20:18:22 Updated: lame-3.99.4-2.el6.rf.i686 I'm not saying that caused the problem but it's all I could find that changed. When I ls in /dev there is no dsp entry. That would explain why mplayer Can't open audio device

It seems that each time I get a new checkout of * from CVS my Cisco 7960 works worse than before. I know this stuff's in flux, so I mention this in case it's news. Anyone else having trouble? What I'm seeing (er, hearing) is really choppy audio. The previous version I had installed had fairly frequent audio dropouts (not present when I make the same calls through the same * box

After downloading the latest CVS head and testing it with the Cisco 7960 (SIP v7.2), it appears that it's still necessary to patch rtp.c to avoid audio dropouts. I'm quite sure my gateway provider is running an older version of Asterisk, and I suppose that this may be the root cause. But I mention the issue here because it seems like it would be a mistake to ship Asterisk 1.0 if it

Hello, I am currently pricing out various T1 and PRI options for a client of mine. We need voice and data - we want T's. Whether it be two seperate T's, two superate fractional T's, or one combined fractional T, we need it done. We are getting pricing and one provider is telling us that they have quality issues with the "Integrated Access" product. From what they

Hello, I'm having some issues grouping cases for some Mann-Whitney U tests I'm attempting to run. I'm willing to use wilcox.test if it'll work; I've also tried wilcox_test() from the "coin" package. Here's the deal: for each column (A through H), I would like to run the two-sample independent test, comparing Group 5 (CD8.14 through CD8.17) to Group 6 (CD8.18

Dear Stefan I need to apply a Mann Whitney test to my data, by applying a bootstrap, in R. Loonkig for an answer in internet I found your question to the R mailing list but I have not found the answer to your question. Please, could you help me? thank you very much in advance. Best regards Luciana

Does anyone have a piece of code or know how I can use R to generate a table of critical values for the Mann-Whitney (aka Wilcoxon Rank Sum) test. Ideally, I'd like a table that contains the critical values for any two samples of size 3 through 30. I could use Monte Carlo simulation or the normal approximation when n1 and n2 are greater than, 10, but I figured someone may know how to

An earlier post had posed the question: "Does anybody know what is relation between 'T' value calculated by 'wilcox_test' function (coin package) and more common 'W' value?" I found the question interesting and ran the commands in R and SPSS. The W reported by R did not seem to correspond to either Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon W or the Z which I have more

Hi, I do want to use the Mann-Whitney test which ranks my data and then uses those ranks rather than the actual data. Here is the R code i am using: group1<- c(1.34,1.47,1.48,1.49,1.62,1.67,1.7,1.7,1.7,1.73,1.81,1.84,1.9,1.96,2, 2,2.19,2.29,2.29,2.41,2.41,2.46,2.5,2.6,2.8,2.8,3.07,3.3) > group2<-

Hi, I have a statistical question. To apply the Mann Whitney test to compare a pair of vectors, they must to have the same length ? Thanks, Rodrigo [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I know that I can perform a Mann-Whitney U test with wilcox.test(x,y) But instead of an U-value I get a W-Value. Is it possible to change this?

Hi all, The Kruskal-Wallis test is a generalization of the two-sample Mann-Whitney test to *k* samples. That being the case, the Kruskal-Wallis test with *k*=2 should give an identical p-value to the Mann-Whitney test, should it not? x1<-c(1:5) x2<-c(6,8,9,11) a<-wilcox.test(x1,x2,paired=FALSE) b<-kruskal.test(list(x1,x2),paired=FALSE) a$p.value [1] 0.01587302 b$p.value [1]

Dear r-helpers, I want to test groups of samples for significant differences. Question: Does Group1 differ significantly from group2. This is a question to be answered by mann-whitney-u-test. I know that I can use wilcox.test with 2 samples. My problem: How can r perform the test automatically if there are more than 2 groups in my data frame. Test group1 vs. 2, 1 vs. 3, 1 vs. 4, etc. This is

I have time-series data from a pair of inexpensive self-logging 3-axis accelerometers (http://www.gcdataconcepts.com/xlr8r-1.html). Since I'm not sure of the vibration/shock spectrum I'm measuring, for my initial sensor characterization run the units were mounted together with the sample rate set to the maximum of 640 samples/sec. Unfortunately, at this sample rate there are significant

Hello, I am hoping someone could shed some light into the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test for me? In looking through Stats references, the Mann-Whitney U-test and the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test are statistically equivalent. When using the following dataset: m <- c(2.0863,2.1340,2.1008,1.9565,2.0413,NA,NA) f <- c(1.8938,1.9709,1.8613,2.0836,1.9485,2.0630,1.9143) and the wilcox.test command as

Howdy all... When making SIP calls through my X100P from X-Lite to the PSTN I'm getting 3-5 second dropouts in both directions. I've tried ulaw and GSM, but that doesn't seem to make a difference, and the * box is on my local net. Here's my hardware: Celeron 2.4GHz, 512MB, Slackware 9.1, 2 X100P, 1 T100P. Any ideas what could be happening, or pointers as to how to shoot this

Hello, can someone please help me with coding a function for a bootstrap WMW test (package boot, R under Windows, version 1.6.2)?

Dear Sir, I am comparing two samples using wilcox.test in R. Literature appears to describe mann whitney u test as the most appropriate test to use on my data. is the wilcox.test function equivalent to mann-whitney u? Is there a way to gain the U-value as apposed to the W-value in R? Thank you