similar to: reporting multiple objects out of a function

I have a large R program that I am constantly running over and over again. At the beginning of this program, I create a hige matrix and a huge dataframe but these are constant. What I mean by constant is that, if I run the program over later, I really should just use the old matrix and dataframe ( if they exist ) that were created in a previous run so that the program doesn't have to spend

Dear WizaRds, I am sorry to bother you with a newbie question, but although I tried to solve my problem using the various .pdf files (Introduction, help pages etc.), I have come to a complete stop. Please be so kind as to guide me a little bit along my way of exploring multivariate analysis in R. I want to test wether the means-vector mu1 of X, consisting of the means per column of that matrix

Dear list, I have developed a forward-time population genetics simulation environment simuPOP, which is a set of C++ (template) classes/functions wrapped by SWIG as Python libraries. R is used extensively as plotting and statistical analysis engine through RPy package. I use Python to wrap simuPOP since most the following can be easily done using SWIG or Python C API. However, since Python is

Hi all, Suppose I want to set the values in a column to the log of the values of another column like so: object$LogDist <- log10(object$Distance) How do I loop through the objects if I have object1, object2, etc to perform this function? object1$LogDist <- log10(object1$Distance) object2$LogDist <- log10(object2$Distance) object3$LogDist <- log10(object3$Distance) I was trying to

Hi everyone, have a small problem trying to converting a dataset in matrix form to an array. Specifically: data include 3D measurement -x,y,z of 59 points in 36 objects. They are stored as a matrix (x) of 2124 rows and 3 columns. What I want to do is to extract each subject's dataset using an array (b). Accordingly, I tried the following command: b<-array(a,c(59,3,36)). The problem is

Dear useRs, I have a function that creates several global objects with assign("obj",obj,.GlobalEnv), and which I need to run iteratively in another function. The code is similar to f <- function(...) { assign("obj",obj,.GlobalEnv) } fct <- function(...) { for (i in 1:1000) { ... f(...) ...obj... rm(obj) #code fails without this line } } I don't understand

Hi, is there a way to reference to a data object without copying it? For example I have a huge matrix called dist and I want two objects obj1 and obj2 to have a memeber dist that points to the matrix, but I don't want, for memory reasons, to copy the matrix twice. As far as I understand the following code will generate three copies of my data: dist <- some_code_that_generates_data

I need the function all.equal which is in Splus but not yet in R. Below is a first cut. Comments would be appreciated. Paul Gilbert _______ all.equal <- function(obj1, obj2, ...) {if(mode(obj1) != mode(obj2) ) return("modes differ.") if(class(obj1) != class(obj2)) return("classes differ.") if(! all(unlist(attributes(obj1)) ==

Hi all, I have a problem while subsetting a dataframe that is while I am using *%in%* condition like *stemp<-subset(temp, obj1 %in% obj2,select=c(temp))* this is working and giving results that what ever is there is both *obj1*and *obj2* ** ** but I want to get values which is there in *obj1* but not in *obj2 * can anyone help me how to get those values. i tried with *%o%* but i am not

I have a generic function test.equal <- function(obj1, obj2, ...) UseMethod("test.equal") however, the only argument that specific methods use is "fuzz" so I would like to change this to test.equal <- function(obj1, obj2, fuzz=???) UseMethod("test.equal") The problem is that some methods use slightly different default values for fuzz than others. How should

Dear All, I came across an error message recently when constructing a reference class, an example is attached below, it looks like only if I call a specific method in advance, otherwise it cannot be found in defined method without using .self, this make it difficulty that sometimes in my initialize method, I need to call other method defined in the same reference class, the workaround for this is

Hello, everyone! I picked up R several months ago and have adopted it as my choice for statistical programming. Coming from a Java background, I can honestly say that R is not only free, it is better tha S-plus: the lexical scope in R makes it very simple to simulate Java's object model. For this, I encourage everyone to read the artcle: Robert Gentleman and Ross Ihaka (2000) "Lexical

Hello, Before I get into troubles I ask here: I make a call to a C function using .C. What I would like to know is if the arguments in the .C call can also be 'temporary' objects. An example will illustrate this: # here we don't have a temporary Obj1 = 5 .C("Func", as.integer(Obj1 ), ...) # certainly works # here we do have a temporary Obj2 = 5 .C("Func",

I am currently running a generalized linear mixed effect model using glmer and I want to estimate how much of the variance is explained by my random factor. summary(glmer(cbind(female,male)~date+(1|dam),family=binomial,data= liz3")) Generalized linear mixed model fit by the Laplace approximation Formula: cbind(female, male) ~ date + (1 | dam) Data: liz3 AIC BIC logLik deviance 241.3

hi, say I have consecutively numbered objects obj1, obj2, ... in my R workspace. I want to acces one of them inside a function, with the number given as an argument. Where can I find help on how to do that? Somebody must have been trying to do this before... Some keywords to start a search are appreciated as well. Here's an example, I hope it clarifies what I'm trying to do: obj1 <-

Hello, I'm trying to use coxph() function to fit a very simple Cox proportional hazards regression model (only one covariate) but the parameter space is restricted to an open set (0, 1). Can I still obtain a valid estimate by using coxph function in this scenario? If yes, how? Any suggestion would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!!! [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, recently R CMD check --as-cran has noticed some more issues with package namespace imports with the recommended remedy to use importFrom() and friends. In my case, there was only a conflict restricted to some few imports, while I would prefer to still import all the non-conflicting objects, methods, and classes of the respective package namespace. So would it be possible to have some new

Hi all! Is it possible somehow to specify *order* of object files to be put to executable file? For example, I want to put obj1.o and obj2.o somewhere at the beginning, so when executable file would be mapped to memory, this code would be accessed quickly.

----Snip-- struct st1{ int a; }; struct st2{ int b; }; struct st { struct st1 obj1; struct st2 obj2; }Obj; int test1(struct st1 * ptr1 , struct st2 * ptr2, struct st2 *ptr3) { ptr1->a = 10; *ptr3 = *ptr2; return ptr1->a; } --Snip--- For the above case GCC is able to store forward the value 10 to the return place. LLVM is not doing this. GCC https://godbolt.org/z/FCjCXy LLVM

Dear list, I am fitting a logistic multi-level regression model and need to test the difference between the ordinary logistic regression from a glm() fit and the mixed effects fit from glmer(), basically I want to do a likelihood ratio test between the two fits. The data are like this: My outcome is a (1,0) for health status, I have several (1,0) dummy variables RURAL, SMOKE, DRINK, EMPLOYED,